Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Using 2 extruder with a single stepper

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    5
    7
    331
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • audryhomeundefined
      audryhome
      last edited by

      Hi there,

      I am trying to figure out how to drive an hypothetic double extruder whose stepper would be mechanically switched from a single driver, who could be mapper to, for instance E0 and E1 with a separate macro that would drive some clutch through, say , a servo.

      Could not try this for the moment, my printer has only one extruder.

      Many thanks for help

      theruttmeisterundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fcwiltundefined
        fcwilt
        last edited by

        It could be done.

        You might have to issue the extruder stepper configuration commands when switching from one to the other.

        The multiple tool handling features of the firmware would be used for this.

        Frederick

        Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • theruttmeisterundefined
          theruttmeister @audryhome
          last edited by

          @audryhome
          https://patents.google.com/patent/US7604470B2/en

          Isolate, substitute, verify.

          audryhomeundefined BatLordundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • audryhomeundefined
            audryhome @theruttmeister
            last edited by

            @theruttmeister Thanks for the info, that's more or less the same idea, using Orbiters extruders, which use lightweight steppers with an epicycloidal gearbox.

            theruttmeisterundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BatLordundefined
              BatLord @theruttmeister
              last edited by BatLord

              @theruttmeister A really great guide!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • theruttmeisterundefined
                theruttmeister @audryhome
                last edited by

                @audryhome said in Using 2 extruder with a single stepper:

                @theruttmeister Thanks for the info, that's more or less the same idea, using Orbiters extruders, which use lightweight steppers with an epicycloidal gearbox.

                Ahem... its an ordinary planetary gearbox

                The Stratasys design probably uses a brushless servo with integral multi-stage planetary gearbox... they aren't too worried about costs.
                The advantage of a common motor might be cost, but its more likely size. That head is significantly more compact, plus if done correctly, registration between nozzles should be really good.
                Its a very elegant way to move the unused nozzle out of the way.
                That aspect is probably out of patent (as the whole 'moving the nozzle up and down' concept is in an earlier one that I think has passed) but using a single motor for two extruders is still covered for a few years.

                Their earlier designs used a strange single/double nozzle. Slightly better than two separate nozzles that don't move, but still not great.

                The real challenge for using a single motor with two extruders is coming up with something that isn't just as heavy, complicated or expensive as using two motors.

                Isolate, substitute, verify.

                zaptaundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • zaptaundefined
                  zapta @theruttmeister
                  last edited by

                  @theruttmeister said in Using 2 extruder with a single stepper:

                  ... using a single motor for two extruders is still covered

                  Looking at the claims of this patent, it also require that each of the two will work on a reversed motor direction, so if you find a different way, it will be a valid workaround. (not that it matter for makers and hobbyists).

                  Anybody knows if this design actually works and used in a product? Sometimes companies file patents just to be on the safe side.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA