Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Polar Printer Steps/Degree?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    5
    49
    2.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dc42undefined
      dc42 administrators @Phospherus
      last edited by dc42

      @phospherus said in Polar Printer Steps/Degree?:

      @cncmodeller

      So 2.5 is what my M92 Y setting would be then?

      Multiply 2.5 by whatever microstep setting you use, typically 16.

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      Phospherusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Phospherusundefined
        Phospherus @dc42
        last edited by Phospherus

        @dc42

        Thank you. After setting that and getting my hot end perfectly centered on the bed I have achieved a perfect 60x60 square test print.
        I do have one question though. I am running a genuine Duet ethernet and have used it on other printers with out issue. On the polar printer it appears as though I get some small hesitations at the end of like shell lines that I have never seen before on a more traditional printer. Is this normal behavior?

        CNCModellerundefined shadiundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • CNCModellerundefined
          CNCModeller @Phospherus
          last edited by

          @phospherus

          I had some jitter on RRF 2 with my Duet ethernet, moving to RRF 3 seems to have cured it. But I've been rebuilding the printer since I upgraded the firmware so haven't done anything apart from test prints so far.

          Polar Duet3 Mini + 1HCL
          https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWjZVEdMv1BY82izahK45qKh-hp3NFkix
          Wanhao D4S: Duet2
          https://forum.duet3d.com/post/296755
          K40 Laser, Duet2
          https://forum.duet3d.com/post/312082
          Wanhao D5S
          https://www.youtube.com/CNCModellerUK

          Phospherusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Phospherusundefined
            Phospherus @CNCModeller
            last edited by Phospherus

            @cncmodeller
            I am on 3.2.2 I tried using the latest beta also but polar seems broken in it. Would not really call it a jitter. Will check jerk settings.

            dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators @Phospherus
              last edited by

              @phospherus said in Polar Printer Steps/Degree?:

              @cncmodeller
              I am on 3.2.2 I tried using the latest beta also but polar seems broken in it. Would not really call it a jitter. Will check jerk settings.

              In what way is 3.2.2 not working in polar mode?

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              Phospherusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Phospherusundefined
                Phospherus @dc42
                last edited by Phospherus

                @dc42

                3.2.2 is working fine. I have a test print that is a 10mm width square that is almost the diameter of the bed. On 3.2.2 it prints fine. I tried upgrading to 3.3 beta 2 and it prints as a circle. Go back to 3.2.2 and works fine again.

                dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dc42undefined
                  dc42 administrators @Phospherus
                  last edited by

                  @phospherus, please post your config.g file and your test print file, then I will try to reproduce the problem with 3.3beta.

                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                  Phospherusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Phospherusundefined
                    Phospherus @dc42
                    last edited by

                    @dc42

                    Here are the files you requested.

                    config.g

                    Test_Print.gcode

                    dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dc42undefined
                      dc42 administrators @Phospherus
                      last edited by

                      @phospherus, you have this in your config.g:

                      ; Axis Limits
                      M208 X0 Y0 Z0 S1                              ; set axis minima
                      M208 X120 Y210 Z150 S0                        ; set axis maxima
                      

                      but your GCode file contains this:

                      G1 X71.748 Y74.220 E9.6802
                      G1 X-71.748 Y74.220 E19.1301
                      G1 X-74.220 Y71.748 E19.3603
                      

                      so you need to change your M208 S1 command to allow negative X and Y coordinates. M208 is always specified in Cartesian coordinates.

                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                      Phospherusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Phospherusundefined
                        Phospherus @dc42
                        last edited by Phospherus

                        @dc42

                        Ok I understand what your saying. Question is though why did it work like that in 3.2.2 but not in the Beta firmware? And why would X ever go - value when 0 is center of bed? Perhaps I sliced it wrong after I updated to 3.3Beta2.

                        Another question more on setup of polar is my Y axis is setup for continuous rotation, No homing switch on Y. Does the Polar kinematics then ignore the 208 values? And if not what should it be?

                        dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators @Phospherus
                          last edited by

                          @phospherus said in Polar Printer Steps/Degree?:

                          @dc42

                          Ok I understand what your saying. Question is though why did it work like that in 3.2.2 but not in the Beta firmware?

                          Perhaps the M208 limits were not to polar kinematics applied prior to 3.3beta.

                          And why would X ever go - value when 0 is center of bed? Perhaps I sliced it wrong after I updated to 3.3Beta2.

                          Please provide a test file that you have tested with 3.2.2beta.

                          Another question more on setup of polar is my Y axis is setup for continuous rotation, No homing switch on Y. Does the Polar kinematics then ignore the 208 values? And if not what should it be?

                          The M208 values are the Cartesian coordinate limits that you want to place on movement, not limits on the movement of the individual motors.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          Phospherusundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Phospherusundefined
                            Phospherus @dc42
                            last edited by

                            @dc42

                            Ok I went back to 3.3 beta2 for a sanity check. I will include my test print file that I just tried on 3.2.2 with the same config.

                            config.g

                            Test file is above limit for upload. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TDfrflJFM2K79y0WpiGgJVcTUF-hkG9W/view?usp=sharing

                            First picture is behavior with 3.3 Beta2

                            20210417_053052.jpg

                            Second is the same file printed on 3.2.2

                            20210417_053229.jpg

                            As you you can see first picture it prints the circles then on infill does an arch is the same spot and just builds up until I stop it.

                            Second looks normal ofcourse. Not a complete print as I stopped it to do the 3.3 Beta test.

                            o_lampeundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • o_lampeundefined
                              o_lampe @Phospherus
                              last edited by

                              @phospherus
                              Do you use ArcWelder as post-processing script?

                              Phospherusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Phospherusundefined
                                Phospherus @o_lampe
                                last edited by

                                @o_lampe
                                No just sliced using Supersclicer.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Phospherusundefined
                                  Phospherus @dc42
                                  last edited by

                                  @dc42

                                  Did the above provide any insight?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • shadiundefined
                                    shadi @Phospherus
                                    last edited by shadi

                                    @phospherus Hi can you please help me it seems i have the same issue my design is that y turntable plate and x is R should that work if i put Y value 2.5 is this what has been discussed in your subject ? and what about X value then ? M92 X?? Y2.5 is this how m92 should look like but i just would like to mention if that can work with SKR1.4 that has repaprfirmware on it ? I slice using Cura the output file from cura is linear coordinate and I assume the firmware should convert it to polar

                                    Phospherusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Phospherusundefined
                                      Phospherus @shadi
                                      last edited by Phospherus

                                      @shadi
                                      If you are using reprap on skr as far as I know the values should be the same but can not swear to that as I use OEM boards.

                                      Your X axis is non rotational I assume so it would be figured by pulley teeth and step angle

                                      So 200 steps = 1 revolution (360degress / 1.8 degrees per step). multiplied by micro stepping factor of 16 will = 3200

                                      Pitch of the belt for GT2 is 2mm. Multiplied by the number of teeth on motor pulley. We will use 20. So 2 x 20 = 40

                                      Then 3200/40 = 80 steps per mm for a 1.8 degree motor with GT2 belt and a 20 tooth pinion.

                                      For the rotational bed we need to know what gear reduction you are using if any. The step angle of your stepper and the following should tell you what your value would be. If your not running 20:90 gear reduction then my value will not work for you.

                                      The formula CNCModeller provided is.

                                      1.8 Deg/step at the motor x 20 / 90 = 0.4 deg/step at the bed.

                                      1/0.4 = 2.5 steps/Deg at the bed.

                                      1.8 degree is the step angle of the stepper motor multiplied by my gear ratio.

                                      20/90 is my gear ratio. Pinion or drive gear divided by my driven gear which is 90 which comes to 0.4

                                      0.4 is the fraction of a degree at the bed through the gear reduction.

                                      So we want to know how many steps to make a degree with the reduction. So you divide 1 degree by the steps at the bed which is the 2.5 steps to get 1 degree at the bed.

                                      Then you must take the last value and multiply it by your step multiplier mine is 2.5 X 16 = 40. That is what is enter for your Y in the config.

                                      I hope this helps.

                                      And thank you CNCModeller for the original formula.

                                      shadiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • shadiundefined
                                        shadi @Phospherus
                                        last edited by shadi

                                        This post is deleted!
                                        Phospherusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Phospherusundefined
                                          Phospherus @shadi
                                          last edited by

                                          @shadi

                                          Just tell me how many teeth are on the gear on the stepper motor and how many teeth are on the big gear driven by the stepper motor.

                                          shadiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • dc42undefined
                                            dc42 administrators @Phospherus
                                            last edited by dc42

                                            @phospherus, I don't have a polar printer, but I did some firmware tests in polar mode before I released 3.3beta3 and the motor movements appeared correct to me. Please can you re-test that print using the 3.3beta3 release.

                                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                            shadiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA