Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    "tiny" 3d printer of high quality?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    6
    13
    1.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • tenajaundefined
      tenaja
      last edited by

      Hi. I'm new here. I am evaluating the Duet for a few projects.

      In the meantime, do any of you have a recommendation for a very small but high quality 3d printer?
      I am looking for one with maybe 4x6x4" tall capacity, of high enough quality that a non-techy person can use it easily. This would be for making the same 4-5 parts over and over. Aside from being low maintenance after properly setup, small physical size is important. I am hoping for one that is not much larger than a standard sheet of paper, and under 1' tall. Speed is not critical, but good looking prints are.

      I have seen the Cetus and Fabrikator mini–has anybody upgraded one?

      Thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Qdeathstarundefined
        Qdeathstar
        last edited by

        If you want something that small with very high quality, look into getting a DLP resin printer printer…

        https://www.3dprintersonlinestore.com/wanhao-d7-resin-3d-printer?gclid=Cj0KCQiAnOzSBRDGARIsAL-mUB3e0HdJiB1Rv_k955hyU-eT7f8_FE73ZjW18RsPSbVG1LuqQ5PCH98aAq2kEALw_wcB

        https://www.aniwaa.com/product/3d-printers/formlabs-form-2/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • tenajaundefined
          tenaja
          last edited by

          Thanks, but I already have a Form1+, and the resin strength does not seem to be there.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • tenajaundefined
            tenaja
            last edited by

            To clarify my definition of quality, a "quality" FDM machine will not be sloppy, will not wear out fast (500 to 1k very small prints) and require lots of tuning. It should be repeatable, reliable, and predictable. The home positions will be the same place every time, and once the gcode is dialed in, it might only need slight tweaking if there are large variations between spools.

            My end goal is to set up a selector switch so the operator can turn it to the desired part (3-4 options), and hit start. I already have a "finicky" machine, and that is fine for one-offs, but this one is for low volume production of small parts so I don't have to spend time fiddling.

            Thanks.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • kraegarundefined
              kraegar
              last edited by

              Dice is a small FDM that can produce very high quality prints. http://www.instructables.com/id/DICE-a-Tiny-Rigid-and-Superfast-3D-printer/

              The build volume is smaller than you specified, though.

              You could scale down a railcore II perhaps: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

              Though I've not looked too hard into going smaller - most people want it to be scaled up.

              Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
              https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators
                last edited by

                I suggest a miniature delta using Nema 14 motors and magnetic/Delrin rods, although I don't know of an existing design for one that small. You could control it with a PanelDue modified so that it only allows the operator to run the predefined macros.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • kraegarundefined
                  kraegar
                  last edited by

                  The SeeMeCNC Eris is pretty small, too, but was discontinued. Might be able to find one used very cheap. With a duet added, the quality might be good enough.

                  Co-Creator of the RailcoreII CoreXY printer
                  https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2407174

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DjDemonDundefined
                    DjDemonD
                    last edited by

                    its just an idea but there is a microdelta design, magnetic rods would probably help, but at this size accuracy is easier to achieve so it works quite well with traxxas joints.

                    https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1874766

                    Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
                    www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
                    PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dc42undefined
                      dc42 administrators
                      last edited by

                      One other thought: with a larger printer, you could print several of the same parts simultaneously. For example, if you print 4 at a time, then only 1/4 as much operator intervention is needed to remove the completed prints and start a new set.

                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephencundefined
                        stephenc
                        last edited by

                        I've built something small and good looking 🙂 though I wouldn't say my machine is operator friendly…

                        Stephen
                        https://github.com/stephenci/ZideX

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • tenajaundefined
                          tenaja
                          last edited by

                          @dc42:

                          One other thought: with a larger printer, you could print several of the same parts simultaneously. For example, if you print 4 at a time, then only 1/4 as much operator intervention is needed to remove the completed prints and start a new set.

                          That size I quoted IS big enough to print 4 at a time… 🙂 Probably big enough for 8 at a time with 2 print heads. They are small parts.

                          Actually, the qty is low enough that 2 print heads is not necessary, but it is what I am doing now. I just want a simple solution to make a few parts a week without tying up my big machine. It seems I always need to make parts when I want to use it for something else.

                          As for the kits and DIY machines, I am just too busy to tackle another project. I don't mind spending a little time to tune it and make it semi-automatic, but I don't have time for a build.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DjDemonDundefined
                            DjDemonD
                            last edited by

                            How about this system?

                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzYMd95iSsg&feature=youtu.be

                            It uses the 86duino printer, PLA only I suspect but can print quite a few items with the option build plate cassette.

                            Simon. Precision Piezo Z-Probe Technology
                            www.precisionpiezo.co.uk
                            PT1000 cartridge sensors NOW IN, just attach to your Duet board directly!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • tenajaundefined
                              tenaja
                              last edited by

                              I love that automation; unfortunately, these parts are too low volume for it to be practical. I would set something like that up if I was lacking in projects.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA