Your Duet rejected the HTTP request: page not found
-
it actually triggered -1.38 but that was too close to the bed so i raised it until the paper had a little friction going under. i loaded a test gcode and it seems the auto level is way off. it is probibing 11 points across the x axis and i lost count on the y axis. it is also only going about 60% of the way on the x axis when running the auto level.It started around the center of the bed instead of the front corner of the bed. (Side question how do i increase the movement speed for homing)
-
It sounds to me that your Z=0 level was off when you started. before you measured the trigger height, did you lower the nozzle until it was just touching the bed and then send G92 Z0, as described at https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Test_and_calibrate_the_Z_probe#Section_Calibrate_the_Z_probe_trigger_height ?
-
no i misunderstood the directions. I raised the z axis 10 each time before running G31
-
M557 X15:215 Y15:239 S20 I was curioius if the S20 in this code from the Zprobe area in the config.g file was the number of probing points? Also how do i increase my homing speed?
-
I am trying to run the test and calibrate again as your recommended. But I am running into an issue. I centered the nozzle over the bed using the jog controls, i lowered the z until the nozzle gripped a piece of paper, then sent command G92 Z0. Then tried G30 S-1 and i would receive error message insufficient axises homed. What am I doing wrong?
-
I think my steps are wrong. When i am homed on the x it is 230 but when i move the x with the jog 100 or so it zeros out the x and im only at the center of the bed, its the same for the y
-
// default settings
#define DEFAULT_AXIS_STEPS_PER_UNIT {80,80,800,723.38} // default steps per unit for RoBo 3D R1
I used the above when creating the config in the reprap website. I believe i chose 32steps
; Drives
M569 P0 S0 ; Drive 0 goes forwards
M569 P1 S1 ; Drive 1 goes forwards
M569 P2 S0 ; Drive 2 goes forwards
M569 P3 S0 ; Drive 3 goes forwards
M350 X32 Y32 Z32 I0 ; Configure microstepping without interpolation
M350 E16 I1 ; Configure microstepping with interpolation
M92 X80 Y80 Z800 E723.38 ; Set steps per mm
M566 X900 Y900 Z12 E120 ; Set maximum instantaneous speed changes (mm/min)
M203 X30000 Y30000 Z300 E1500 ; Set maximum speeds (mm/min)
M201 X500 Y250 Z250 E250 ; Set accelerations (mm/s^2)
M906 X1000 Y1000 Z1000 E800 I30 ; Set motor currents (mA) and motor idle factor in per cent
M84 S30 ; Set idle timeout -
ok i doubled my e steps and now it looks appropriate. I will go ahead and run the test and calibration again now
-
when i try to configure and claibrate the z probe. I center the x and y after homing them.then lower the z until it grips paper and send the g92 z0 command. zeros out the z.
then i raise the nozzle by 5 and run g30 s-1 and the nozzle is too close to the bed. the values are still negative.
What am I doing wrong here. I cant seem to get it to probe and leave the nozzle at the correct height for it to grip the paper -
tried a test print
and got Error: Z probe already triggered at start of probing move
Error: G29: No valid grid defined for bed probing -
G28 ; home all axes
G29 ; probe the bed
G1 Z5 F5000 ; lift nozzle
M109 S[extruder0_temperature] ; set the extruder temp and wait
G1 X0 Y0 ; move to begin wipe
G1 X20 Z0 F4800 ; wipe here is my beiginingg script for S3D -
do i need to change g29 to m557 in my simplify 3d scripts for auto leveling? or rather to define the mesh grid?
-
The M557 command to define your grid area may have unreachable areas. This gets complicated because you technically don't have a z probe. So you cant really probe the bed. I would just use g28 to home the printer until you get an actual probe.
-
thanks for the advise. after reading this forum i was under the impression I could keep using the original auto level style of the machine. https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/4737/zprobe-robo3d-r1
-
Yes it could auto level the x axis, but that's not the same as probing the bed.
-
@phaedrux hmmm i am confused would you mind clarifying the difference for me. Sorry and thank you
-
A probe is normally attached to the print head and is movable to all areas of the bed so it can find the height of the bed across its whole surface. This can be used to get an idea of how the bed lays in relation to the print head.
What you have is two end stops in line with the x axis. This lets you adjust the tilt of the x axis to match the bed. But this is just a straight line between the two z motors. This lets you keep the z axis level on both sides, but that's about it.
Does that make sense?
-
@sleepless said in Your Duet rejected the HTTP request: page not found:
M557 X15:215 Y15:239 S20 I was curioius if the S20 in this code from the Zprobe area in the config.g file was the number of probing points? Also how do i increase my homing speed?
S20 is the spacing (in mm) between probing points.
Homing speeds are set by the F parameter in the G1 S1 commands in the homing files; except that if you home Z using a Z probe, then you will use a G30 command to home Z and the speed is the same as for all Z probing moves, as defined by the F parameter in the M558 command.
Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com -
But they both take multiple points from the bed to adjust for any misalignment so I guess I can see the difference in the way the do their calibrating based off those points, but in the end both styles (probe or microswitch) should go through the autolevel procedure. It seems you are saying the robo cant do this with the microswitch?
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFywzPM9lfA here is a link to the robo3d autolevel for reference
