Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. pnokel
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 3
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    pnokel

    @pnokel

    0
    Reputation
    1
    Profile views
    3
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    pnokel Unfollow Follow

    Latest posts made by pnokel

    • RE: M290 problems

      I am just using babystepping as a workaround until I figure out my probe offsets. I understand that this is not what baby stepping is for.
      The behaviour of the M290 command was just different from what I expected. I think there should be a hint in the documentation what the command can do. It confused me quite a bit that I can add even .01mm with relative babysteps, but only full mm with absolute steps.

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      pnokelundefined
      pnokel
    • RE: M290 problems

      Forgot to mention: I am on version 1.21

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      pnokelundefined
      pnokel
    • M290 problems

      Hi,

      I am trying to set Z baby steps in my config.g:
      M290 R0 Z1.23 (for example)
      That results in an offset of 1mm (as displayed in DWC and in the gcode console).

      M290 R0 Z0 does reset the offset to 0mm.
      A manual M290 R0 Z1.23 results in the same offset: 1mm
      https://www.dropbox.com/s/0a6txpzsxvjgik2/Screenshot 2018-04-24 11.21.55.png?dl=0

      What does work is setting the offset step by step:
      https://www.dropbox.com/s/os20xd2rge3pzd7/Screenshot 2018-04-24 11.23.21.png?dl=0
      M290 Z1.6 (offset is now 1mm)
      M290 Z0.23 (offset is now 1.23mm)

      There is no difference in using Z or S as parameter for M290.
      The up and down buttons in DWC are working as expected.

      Am I missing something here?

      Best regards,
      Paul

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      pnokelundefined
      pnokel