Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. scheffer
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 2
    • Posts 14
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    scheffer

    @scheffer

    0
    Reputation
    1
    Profile views
    14
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    scheffer Unfollow Follow

    Latest posts made by scheffer

    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      Did another two rounds of measuring the H offsets and found some different values. Probably needed some experience in paper gripping to get the right feel to do it consistently for every point.

      first new round:
      -0.14
      -0.13
      0.09
      0.16
      -0.1
      -0.2
      0.01
      0.09
      0.07

      second new round:
      -0.18
      -0.16
      0.08
      0.17
      -0.08
      -0.18
      0.02
      0.09
      0.1

      New H offset values in the bed.g file:
      ; Probe the bed and do 6- or 7-factor auto calibration
      G30 P0 X-73.6 Y-42.5 Z-99999 H-0.16 ; X tower
      G30 P1 X0 Y-85 Z-99999 H-0.14 ; between X and Y towers
      G30 P2 X73.6 Y-42.5 Z-99999 H0.08 ; Y tower
      G30 P3 X73.6 Y20 Z-99999 H0.17 ; between Y and Z towers
      G30 P4 X0 Y67 Z-99999 H-0.09 ; Z tower
      G30 P5 X-73.6 Y20 Z-99999 H-0.19 ; between Z and X towers
      G30 P6 X-36.8 Y-21.25 Z-99999 H0.01 ; half way to X tower
      G30 P7 X36.8 Y-21.25 Z-99999 H0.09 ; half way to Y tower
      G30 P8 X0 Y42.5 Z-99999 H0.08 ; half way to Z tower
      G30 P9 X0 Y0 Z-99999 S6 ; centre, and auto-calibrate 6 factors

      Finally managed to get good leveling now.
      Thanks for all the help everybody!!

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      Yes correct. Macro executed after gripping a piece of paper.
      Results are not good as the first layer is still not level. My manually inserted three values still perform better. Close to the X tower the nozzle is too close to the bed and close to the Z tower it looks good or maybe slightly too high.

      I was quite surprised to see that there is a 0.3mm difference (lowest and highest measurement) due to effector tilt. Is this quite common or do I have a bad build? And are my H offsets correct? I will do another round of measuring tomorrow to make sure I did not make a mistake.

      After switching the printer on I homed it and used the commands M561 and G31 X0 Y0 before starting the paper gripping. Not sure if they are necessary?

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      Thanks.
      Followed the procedure.
      Made three macros. One to go up with 0.02 mm (my printer is 100 steps/mm), one to go down with 0.02mm and one to do the measurement 3 times:

      [c]
      G92 Z0
      G1 Z5
      G30 S-1
      G1 Z5
      G30 S-1
      G1 Z5
      G30 S-1
      [/c]

      My measure 10 points:
      P0 1.77
      P1 1.67
      P2 1.85
      P3 1.95
      P4 1.73
      P5 1.7
      P6 1.74
      P7 1.82
      P8 1.86
      P9 1.78

      P9 is the center coordinate so I used these H adjustments:
      [c]
      ; Probe the bed and do 6- or 7-factor auto calibration
      G30 P0 X-73.6 Y-42.5 Z-99999 H-0.01 ; X tower
      G30 P1 X0 Y-85 Z-99999 H-0.11 ; between X and Y towers
      G30 P2 X73.6 Y-42.5 Z-99999 H0.07 ; Y tower
      G30 P3 X73.6 Y20 Z-99999 H0.17 ; between Y and Z towers
      G30 P4 X0 Y67 Z-99999 H-0.05 ; Z tower
      G30 P5 X-73.6 Y20 Z-99999 H-0.08 ; between Z and X towers
      G30 P6 X-36.8 Y-21.25 Z-99999 H-0.04 ; half way to X tower
      G30 P7 X36.8 Y-21.25 Z-99999 H0.04 ; half way to Y tower
      G30 P8 X0 Y42.5 Z-99999 H0.08 ; half way to Z tower
      G30 P9 X0 Y0 Z-99999 S6 ; centre, and auto-calibrate 6 factors
      [/c]

      Result still not good…

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      Thanks Doug!!

      Did a couple of auto delta calibration measurements and here are the results:

      G32: Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, deviation before 0.200 after 0.048
      M666: Endstop adjustments X-0.15 Y0.32 Z-0.17, tilt X0.00% Y0.00%
      G32: Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, deviation before 0.059 after 0.058
      M666: Endstop adjustments X-0.20 Y0.36 Z-0.17, tilt X0.00% Y0.00%
      G32: Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, deviation before 0.054 after 0.053
      M666: Endstop adjustments X-0.18 Y0.34 Z-0.16, tilt X0.00% Y0.00%
      G32: Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, deviation before 0.056 after 0.055
      M666: Endstop adjustments X-0.17 Y0.34 Z-0.17, tilt X0.00% Y0.00%

      I then heated the bed to 60 degrees celcius.
      G32: Calibrated 6 factors using 10 points, deviation before 0.079 after 0.050
      M666: Endstop adjustments X-0.18 Y0.35 Z-0.18, tilt X0.00% Y0.00%

      My manually found corrections from the config.g file are:
      M666 X-0.21 Y0.31 Z-0.09

      The results seem pretty consistent although the first two were slightly off.

      So effector tilt might very well be the problem. How do I measure the H offsets of each of my probe points?

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      Thanks Jackal for helping out. My printer is working for a couple of hours more so I will check the values a bit later in the day.

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      I don't see a G3 line in my bed.g file. Here it is:

      [c]
      ; Auto calibration routine for delta printers
      ; Before running this, you should have set up your zprobe Z offset to suit your build, in the G31 command in config.g.

      M561 ; clear any bed transform, otherwise homing may be at the wrong height
      G31 X0 Y0 ; don't want any probe offset for this
      G28 ; home the printer

      ;*** Remove the following line if your Z probe does not need to be deployed
      ;M98 Pdeployprobe.g ; deploy the mechanical Z probe

      ; The first time the mechanical probe is used after deployment, it gives slightly different results.
      ; So do an extra dummy probe here. The value stored gets overwritten later. You can remove this if you use an IR probe.
      ;G30 P0 X0 Y0 Z-99999

      ; Probe the bed and do 6- or 7-factor auto calibration
      G30 P0 X-73.6 Y-42.5 Z-99999 ; X tower
      G30 P1 X0 Y-85 Z-99999 ; between X and Y towers
      G30 P2 X73.6 Y-42.5 Z-99999 ; Y tower
      G30 P3 X73.6 Y20 Z-99999 ; between Y and Z towers
      G30 P4 X0 Y67 Z-99999 ; Z tower
      G30 P5 X-73.6 Y20 Z-99999 ; between Z and X towers
      G30 P6 X-36.8 Y-21.25 Z-99999 ; half way to X tower
      G30 P7 X36.8 Y-21.25 Z-99999 ; half way to Y tower
      G30 P8 X0 Y42.5 Z-99999 ; half way to Z tower
      G30 P9 X0 Y0 Z-99999 S6 ; centre, and auto-calibrate 6 factors

      ;*** Remove the following line if your Z probe does not need to be retracted
      ;M98 Pretractprobe.g ; retract the mechanical Z probe

      G1 X0 Y0 Z150 F10000 ; get the head out of the way of the bed
      ;G28
      [/c]

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      10 factors, 6 for outer circle, 3 for inner circle and one in the middel

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      Adjusting the M666 manually does give me good and consistent results. So I think the PRINTinZ should be flat enough.

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • RE: Auto leveling problems

      [c]
      ; Configuration file for Mini Kossel kit from Think3DPrint3D for testing Duet WiFi

      ; Communication and general
      M111 S0 ; Debug off
      M550 PMiniKosselWiFiTest ; Machine name and Netbios name (can be anything you like)
      M551 Preprap ; Machine password (used for FTP)
      ;*** If you have more than one Duet on your network, they must all have different MAC addresses, so change the last digits
      M540 P0xBE:0xEF:0xDE:0xAD:0xFE:0xED ; MAC Address
      ;*** Wifi Networking
      M552 S1 ; Enable WiFi

      M555 P2 ; Set output to look like Marlin
      M575 P1 B57600 S1 ; Comms parameters for PanelDue

      G21 ; Work in millimetres
      G90 ; Send absolute coordinates…
      M83 ; ...but relative extruder moves

      ; Axis and motor configuration
      M569 P0 S0 ; Drive 0 goes forwards
      M569 P1 S0 ; Drive 1 goes forwards
      M569 P2 S0 ; Drive 2 goes forwards
      M569 P3 S1 ; Drive 3 goes forwards
      M569 P4 S1 ; Drive 4 goes forwards
      M574 X2 Y2 Z2 S0 ; set endstop configuration (all endstops at high end, active low)
      ;*** The homed height is deliberately set too high in the following - you will adjust it during calibration
      M665 R167.79 L316.0 B140 H483.25 X-0.07 Y0.06 Z0 ; set delta radius, diagonal rod length, printable radius and homed height
      M666 X-0.21 Y0.31 Z-0.09 ; put your endstop adjustments here, or let auto calibration find them
      M350 X16 Y16 E16 I1 ; Set 16x microstepping with interpolation
      M92 X100 Y100 Z100 ; Set axis steps/mm
      M906 X1500 Y1500 Z1500 E700 I60 ; Set motor currents (mA) and increase idle current to 60%
      M201 X1000 Y1000 Z1000 E1000 ; Accelerations (mm/s^2)
      M203 X20000 Y20000 Z20000 E3600 ; Maximum speeds (mm/min)
      M566 X1200 Y1200 Z1200 E1200 ; Maximum instant speed changes mm/minute

      ; Thermistors
      M305 P0 T100000 B3950 R4700 H30 L0 ; Put your own H and/or L values here to set the bed thermistor ADC correction
      M305 P1 T100000 B3974 R4700 H30 L0 ; Put your own H and/or L values here to set the first nozzle thermistor ADC correction
      M305 P2 T100000 B3974 R4700 H30 L0 ; Put your own H and/or L values here to set the second nozzle thermistor ADC correction
      M570 S180 ; Hot end may be a little slow to heat up so allow it 180 seconds

      ; Fans
      M106 P1 H-1 ; disable thermostatic mode for fan 1

      ; Tool definitions
      M563 P0 D0 H1 ; Define tool 0
      G10 P0 S0 R0 ; Set tool 0 operating and standby temperatures
      ;*** If you have a single-nozzle build, comment the next 2 lines
      M563 P1 D1 H2 ; Define tool 1
      G10 P1 S0 R0 ; Set tool 1 operating and standby temperatures
      M92 E400:400 ; Set extruder steps per mm

      ; Z probe and compensation definition
      ;*** If you have a switch instead of an IR probe, change P1 to P4 in the following M558 command
      M558 P1 X0 Y0 Z0 ; Z probe is an IR probe and is not used for homing any axes
      G31 X0 Y0 Z2.0 P500 ; Set the zprobe height and threshold (put your own values here)

      ;*** If you are using axis compensation, put the figures in the following command
      M556 S78 X0 Y0 Z0 ; Axis compensation here

      M208 S1 Z-1.0 ; set minimum Z
      ;
      T0 ; select first hot end
      [/c]

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer
    • Auto leveling problems

      I built a delta printer and am using the mini IR probe. I bought the PRINTinZ skin (attached it to really flat glass) and although it seems to be able to measure things well I keep getting inconsistent results. After auto leveling results are never the same. Most of the first layer sticks but other areas will not stick. If I auto level again, other areas stick and some areas might then be too close so no plastic extruding and that often causes nozzle blockage. Bed temperature is 60 degrees, nozzle is at 210 and I'm printing with PLA. I'm thinking of leaving the auto leveling path. Just edit the config file until it seems more or less right for my bed. Would be a pity as I would like to rely on the auto leveling as my build plate is removed once in a while and then I will need to play around with the config settings to get it right again every time.

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      schefferundefined
      scheffer