Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    pt100 vs pt1000

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    4
    6
    3.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • denkeundefined
      denke
      last edited by

      So, I'd like to ask for a piece of your experience ... Why do everyone go for a pt100 sensor despite the additional cabling, daughterboard, etc. instead of a pt1000 which is 2wire and natively supported?

      I looked at comparisons and cewed threw multiple related topics around the net, but I could not find the reason. What am I missing?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by

        • PT1000 sensors in 3mm cartridges used to be hard to find, but they are now readily available.
        • PT100 sensors give better resolution, but the resolution of PT1000 sensors is adequate for 3D printing.
        • PT100 sensors used with a 4-wire connection give better absolute accuracy than PT1000. But PT1000 should be accurate enough.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • denkeundefined
          denke
          last edited by

          Thanks @dc42 !

          But I surmise they are still way better then thermistors, right?

          Vetiundefined deckingmanundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Vetiundefined
            Veti @denke
            last edited by

            @denke said in pt100 vs pt1000:

            But I surmise they are still way better then thermistors, right?

            it depends on your application. for most 3d printing a good thermistor like a semitec 104-gt2 thermistor is good enough.
            see
            https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Temperature_sensors

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • deckingmanundefined
              deckingman @denke
              last edited by

              @denke To add to what @Veti has said, thermistors are more than adequate for 3D printing because we tend to print at whatever temperature gives the best results for a particular filament. So it really does not matter if the displayed value is a couple of degrees or so different from the real value as measured by some other means. And as a general rule, 5 degrees or so either side of the optimum value makes very little difference if any.

              As an aside, I found that PT100s were more susceptible to noise on one printer configuration, which tends to play havoc with the PID algorithm and so the "controlled" temperature always ran 3 or 4 degrees higher than the set temperature. Changing the PT100 to a simple thermistor cured the problem (but so would screened cable in all likely hood).

              Ian
              https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
              https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

              denkeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • denkeundefined
                denke @deckingman
                last edited by

                @deckingman
                Thanks for your reply!

                Since I changed my old aluminum block to a wew cartridge type copper one, I need to buy a reliable cartridge. I wanted to bear down on the quality side, I just could not imagine why do people buy the pt100 when it has many problems (like the one You experienced) and it needs extra cabling and hardware, whereas they could just go for the pt1000.
                Since a quality cartridge thermistor (with known values...) is comparable in price with a pt1000, I decided on the later one, and just wanted some comfirmation. Thanks everyone for the valuable info!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA