Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Any plans 'IP detect'

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Beta Firmware
    8
    31
    1.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • arhiundefined
      arhi @Garfield
      last edited by

      @Garfield said in Any plans 'IP detect':

      Cool, I'll dig some more, I'm going to try Cura and was just setting it all up. I like Prusa Slicer but they've messed up filament profiles for non prusa printers in the latest build, I'm through using Simplify.

      I'm moving from them too and so far tried to move to craftware (best gcode preview), ideamaker, slic3r, prusa slicer and cura ... ideamaker is so far closest to what I can work with, I suggest you try it out 🙂

      @chrishamm any special configuration required or printer name is all that's needed ?

      A Former User? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Former User?
        A Former User @arhi
        last edited by

        @arhi said in Any plans 'IP detect':

        printer name

        printer name or pi's hostname if using DSF (probably subject to change and discussion at length)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Garfieldundefined
          Garfield
          last edited by

          Thanks for the tips - I've downloaded Ideamaker and will try it. To be honest Prusa Slicer if it weren't for the filament profiles ticks a lot of boxes now (I also have a Mk3s), I have yet to find a slicer that really nails bridging and overhangs well but there are so many pitfalls with those anyway it is hard to blame the slicer sometimes.

          arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • zaptaundefined
            zapta @Garfield
            last edited by

            @Garfield said in Any plans 'IP detect':

            ... a small victory at least.

            Considering that printer configuration and IP are static but gcode code is not, it may even qualify as a medium victory. 😉

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Garfieldundefined
              Garfield
              last edited by

              The way this week has gone so far you're not wrong ...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • arhiundefined
                arhi @Garfield
                last edited by arhi

                @Garfield took me a while to try it out, I was looking at everything else but for some reason ignored IM .. The first use is weird, it's kinda different than what I was used to so maybe that .. but after second print I really started to dig it 🙂 .. anyhow really unrelated to this topic so.. ping if you need help with it 😄 I'm far from master (still turn back to s3d from time to time as it's faster - I know where everything is) but I can help with first steps 😄 (only thing that's fscked up with it is gcode preview if your origin is at center of bed)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Danalundefined
                  Danal
                  last edited by

                  @arhi said in Any plans 'IP detect':

                  if your origin is at center of bed

                  DRAT!

                  Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                  arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Garfieldundefined
                    Garfield
                    last edited by

                    I will reach 👍

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • arhiundefined
                      arhi @Danal
                      last edited by

                      @Danal mind it still works great, you position your parts on the bed it apply the offsets and everything is good on print, just when you preview the gcode it "forgets" that origin is in center of the bed so all your gcode is rendered around lower left corner 😄 ... there is no offset for preview 😞

                      Danalundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Danalundefined
                        Danal @arhi
                        last edited by

                        @arhi said in Any plans 'IP detect':

                        @Danal mind it still works great, you position your parts on the bed it apply the offsets and everything is good on print, just when you preview the gcode it "forgets" that origin is in center of the bed so all your gcode is rendered around lower left corner 😄 ... there is no offset for preview 😞

                        Yeah, I can live with that. I will check it out. Although, I am liking SlicerPE more and more.

                        Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Former User?
                          A Former User @arhi
                          last edited by

                          @arhi said in Any plans 'IP detect':

                          craftware (best gcode preview), ideamaker, slic3r, prusa slicer and cura

                          what, no UP! Studio on the list????

                          arhiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • arhiundefined
                            arhi @A Former User
                            last edited by arhi

                            @bearer said in Any plans 'IP detect':

                            @arhi said in Any plans 'IP detect':

                            craftware (best gcode preview), ideamaker, slic3r, prusa slicer and cura

                            what, no UP! Studio on the list????

                            😄 😄 😄 😄 🤣

                            You know I have three TT printers, I kept one till recently with original electronics so I could use UP! Studio to print some of the spare parts if I need to but the thing is so unusable that I converted the last one too... It's similar to S3D used to be better then others but became obsolite and more they pushed changes more they dig themselves deeper 😞 ..

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Garfieldundefined
                              Garfield
                              last edited by

                              What's that then ...

                              What I want is a slicer with half a brain that can handle bridging well, doesn't try to put the top on a round hole using circles (just plain dumb and guaranteed to fail - just bridge the darn thing. Infill that pays attention to part orientation not the orientation to the bed X,Y

                              Slicers could become a whole new thread 😉

                              arhiundefined A Former User? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • arhiundefined
                                arhi @Garfield
                                last edited by

                                @Garfield said in Any plans 'IP detect':

                                doesn't try to put the top on a round hole using circles

                                ah .. I'm yet to find that one 😞

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Former User?
                                  A Former User @Garfield
                                  last edited by

                                  @Garfield said in Any plans 'IP detect':

                                  Slicers could become a whole new thread

                                  pardon the OT; it was but a cheap joke - both the slicer and the post.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Garfieldundefined
                                    Garfield
                                    last edited by

                                    No problem with OT, or jokes ... I can print the same part with 3 different slicers and the impact this has on the print quality / finish on the SAME printer is revealing. Slic3r and the Prusa offspring for instance put rubbish little dabs in places where a solid infil would make much more sense - added perimeters to overcome some of this nonsense. Simplify bridging is appalling, CURA lacks some finesse and is proving tricky to set up even using the same numbers from a successful profile in Slic3r ...

                                    Could waffle all evening ... can already see a defect on the surface of a part that's printing - totally temperature related but if you get that bit correct the rest of the print suffers ....

                                    Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • Phaedruxundefined
                                      Phaedrux Moderator @Garfield
                                      last edited by

                                      @Garfield If you're going to give Cura a try I would recommend this build maintained by one of the Cura contributors. He's implemented a lot of features and fixes that the stock Cura lacked. (Many are now part of Cura actually)

                                      https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s43vqzmi4d2bqe2/AAADdYdSu9iwcKa0Knqgurm4a?dl=0&lst=

                                      Cura is worth the effort if you're willing to go down the rabbit hole to explore and understand the many many options it has to tweak.

                                      Also, for Prusa Slicer, the filaments thing can be worked around I think. The filaments tab is still all there for me. Maybe I'm grandfathered in.

                                      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Garfieldundefined
                                        Garfield
                                        last edited by

                                        The Prusa thing happened recently, I have a mk3s so I've been onboard for a couple of years.

                                        When I use the prusa the filaments appear fine, up until the last release I was using the corexy with no issues, when I try to define the corexy part of the wizard asks for bed and filament temps - which are totally irrelevant in a printer definition.

                                        The only thing appearing in the filament drop down has the same name as the printer profile, reported it, it has had no response.

                                        Guess I've been a bit lazy when it comes to figuring out why it is doing what it is ....

                                        zaptaundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Phaedruxundefined
                                          Phaedrux Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          Perhaps look at the Dependencies page under the filaments tab. "Compatible printers" is set to All for me. And in preferences I have "show incompatible print and filament settings" checked.

                                          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • Garfieldundefined
                                            Garfield
                                            last edited by Garfield

                                            Well I'll be .... think of an adjective

                                            This place is full of genius ... works ...

                                            It's official - going senile ....

                                            Still going to try the CURA and the 'modded' version, and ideamaker ....

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA