Duet Pi Regression - How?
-
@bearer said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
and purging duetsd will clear out the whole /opt/dsf/sd folder configs, macros, gcode, everything.
Agreed. I'm now on the warpath to avoid 'apt purge'.
'apt remove' only removes things in the package manifest, and deletes empty directories. If non empty, it will leave them. I believe the one time I regressed (by a manual method) that everything stayed intact, EXCEPT config.g had been overlaid with the empty-ish distribution copy. All other files, like tfree and tpost and so forth, and macros, they were all intact.
-
@bearer said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
Why is that 95%? Or what is the 5% edge case?
oh, and there is something weird with the reprapfirmeware n.n.n.n-1 and n.n.n.n-999 dependenices for otherwise identical versions. so i ignore the 999 in the rexeg
Me too.
-
With regard to "how to recurse" without depending on the exact structure of the package, this seems to work, then parse the "depends" line:
apt show duetsoftwareframework=1.2.3.0 Package: duetsoftwareframework Version: 1.2.3.0 Priority: standard Section: electronics Maintainer: Duet3D Packaging Authority <pkg@duet3d.com> Installed-Size: unknown Depends: duetcontrolserver (= 1.2.3.0), duetsd (= 1.0.5), duettools (= 1.2.3.0), duetwebserver (= 1.2.1.0), duetwebcontrol (= 2.0.4-1), reprapfirmware (>= 1.2.3.0-1), reprapfirmware (<= 1.2.3.0-999) Homepage: https://pkg.duet3d.com Vcs-Git: https://github.com/chrishamm/DuetSoftwareFramework.git Download-Size: 1,710 B APT-Manual-Installed: yes APT-Sources: https://pkg.duet3d.com unstable/armv7 armhf Packages Description: Meta package for the full Duet software framework -
@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
this seems to work,
missing duetruntime which is why i turne to recusion that ultimately failed if left run to to all the leaf nodes.
-
Hmmm... I wonder how it gets installed? With no dependency?
-
@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
I wonder how it gets installed? With no dependency?
duetcontrolserver has it as a dependency iirc (thus the recursion)
-
Ah, light bulb just came on. Thank you.
-
And, by the way, autopurge (which I am NOT going to use) actually does not purge the recursive stuff after a
sudo apt install duetsoftwareframework=1.2.3.0 duetcontrolserver=1.2.3.0 duetruntime=1.2.3.0 duetsd=1.0.5 duettools=1.2.3.0 duetwebserver=1.2.1.0 duetwebcontrol=2.0.4-1 reprapfirmware=1.2.3.0-1
style install, and an apt remove duetsoftwareframework.
So.... it would not have worked anyway.
-
Just switch to RPM
-
@gtj0 said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
Just switch to RPM
+2
was wondering if aptitude* would be better suited, but decided to brush up on regex instead
*) not better than RPM..
-
@gtj0 said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
Just switch to RPM
How about
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=SMPE? It handled prereqs, coreqs, and even postreqs flawlessly. Why, I've heard you could build and entire OS with it! -
@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
and an apt remove duetsoftwareframework.
apt remove duet* reprapfirmwareis about the same length and oddly more specific. would work with remove and purge for that matter. -
@bearer said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
and an apt remove duetsoftwareframework.
apt remove duet* reprapfirmwareis about the same length and oddly more specific. would work with remove and purge for that matter.Yah, I thought about the nicely structured names. As you said though, if the package changes...
-
@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
As you said though, if the package changes...
then it has a greater chance of catching it as duetruntime still doesn't depend on duetsoftwareframework.
and if
apt remove duetcontrolserver duetruntime duetsd duetsoftwareframework duettools duetwebcontrol duetwebserver reprapfirmwareis the alternative then it needs to be updated anyways.to be honest I have more faith in a
*than apt and dependencies defined for the packages should autoremove fail. -
OK, here is a "first draft" that works. Comments welcome:
./DuetRegress.sh 2.1.0 Currently Installed duetsoftwareframework= Command line argument is requesting duetsoftwareframework=2.1.0 Which has associated reprapfirmware of 2.1.0-1 also known as 3.01-RC9 *********************************************************************************** * Note: The next step will run for a while; the script is (probably) not hung. * *********************************************************************************** To regress to DSF version 2.1.0 which is RRF version 3.01-RC9: 1) Backup your files via: mkdir ~/duetback cp -r /opt/dsf/sd/* ~/duetback or similar. Verify that the backup worked: 'ls ~/duetback' should show directories: 'filaments firmware gcodes macros sys' or similar. 2) Run this command: (it is long, be sure you get it all on one line) sudo apt -y --allow-downgrades install duetsoftwareframework=2.1.0 duetcontrolserver=2.1.0 duetruntime=2.1.0 duetsd=1.0.6 duettools=2.1.0 duetwebcontrol=2.1.4 duetwebserver=2.1.0 reprapfirmware=2.1.0-1 3) Verify system is running properly, web interface opens, etc 4) If Pi runs, but won't connect to Duet Board, bossa the board with the file found at /opt/dsf/sd/sys/Duet3Firmware_MB6HC.bin Instructions here: https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Getting_Started_With_Duet_3#Section_Updating_Duet_3_main_board_firmware 5) Check files like config.g, macros, etc, and restore as required.There are no name or other recursion dependencies in the script. Also, I took out the "apt remove" command, I don't believe it is required, apt will just overlay things.
-
i opted for splitting the lines so it can be easy to read and copy, or if piped/backticked its not.
i'd also reconsider the
-ybit gives apt a chance to complain if it feels the need.pi@raspberrypi:~ $ bash rrfdep.sh 3.01-RC9 sudo apt install \ duetcontrolserver=2.1.0 \ duetsd=1.0.6 \ duettools=2.1.0 \ duetwebserver=2.1.0 \ duetwebcontrol=2.1.4 \ reprapfirmware=2.1.0-1 \ duetsoftwareframework=2.1.0 pi@raspberrypi:~ $don't think i'll put up the version that resolves it from the reprap firmware version, smells like lots of unnecessary load on servers just to save people looking up a table
-
Excellent idea on the lines! I will do that. In fact, I was a bit concerned about line length... not only that, but I'm flattening a 'list' now, all I have to do is not do that.
I go back and forth on the -y. Given that this is intended to be used by people who literally can't even answer the initial "Do you want me to do what you asked? [Y/n]" prompt... well... I'm inclined to leave it in.
re: servers, yeah, this one is entirely local. In fact, it ought to insist on a recent (whatever that means) sudo apt update.
-
This post is deleted! -
@Danal said in Duet Pi Regression - How?:
I go back and forth on the -y. Given that this is intended to be used by people who literally can't even answer the initial "Do you want me to do what you asked? [Y/n]" prompt... well... I'm inclined to leave it in.
you don't get any questions if you have all the packages specified;
the one you're missing is (likely) libunwind8 (if there are questions)no idea how that snuck into anything, but the rest holds true..ref the bottom code block; no -Y and no question (also before libunwind8) https://forum.duet3d.com/post/150402
-
Direct copy from your code block; don't know why it is different on your machine and mine.
P.S. Given the name "lib un-wind ate" I was trying to figure out if you were making a bad pun or someting...
sudo apt install \ > duetcontrolserver=1.2.3.0 \ > duetruntime=1.2.3.0 \ > duetsd=1.0.5 \ > duettools=1.2.3.0 \ > duetwebserver=1.2.1.0 \ > duetwebcontrol=2.0.4-1 \ > reprapfirmware=1.2.3.0-1 \ > duetsoftwareframework=1.2.3.0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be DOWNGRADED: duetcontrolserver duetruntime duetsd duetsoftwareframework duettools duetwebcontrol duetwebserver reprapfirmware 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 8 downgraded, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 32.2 MB/32.2 MB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.2.3.0' of 'duetsoftwareframework:armhf'. W: Sources disagree on hashes for supposely identical version '1.0.5' of 'duetsd:armhf'. Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
