Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    1.18 Z height offset question

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Tuning and tweaking
    3
    13
    1.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mhackneyundefined
      mhackney
      last edited by

      David and all, I upgraded to 1.18 release this morning from 1.17 on one of my deltas. This printer has FSR/JohnSL probing and calibrates to a deviation of 0.01 and I always got a perfect first layer. I saw in the release notes the comment about Z offset:

      You may find that your Z probe trigger height is slightly higher than before, so you should re-measure it

      With the new baby stepping feature I thought it made sense to proceed and print a single layer object that I use to tune settings and use baby stepping to adjust Z. I did this and had to lower Z by 0.20mm. This seems like a a pretty big difference, what are folks experience with Z probe trigger height in 1.18?

      Now the odd thing and question. I subtracted the extra offset from my G31 Z to get "G31 Z-0.35" in config.g. I deleted config-override.g and restarted and then ran delta auto calibration and committed with M500 (again with a 0.01 deviation). I then attempted to print the single layer object and was surprised to find I needed to baby step down 0.20mm again! I verified that my G31 Z-.35 is in config.g and now in config-override,g. Any idea what's going on?

      cheers,
      Michael

      My 3D Printing blog: http://www.sublimelayers.com
      Coming this summer: "3D Printing Strategies - the art of perfecting your designs and prints"

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by

        Was your G31 Z offset previously -0.15 or -0.55 ?

        0.2mm is a larger change than I would expect.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • mhackneyundefined
          mhackney
          last edited by

          It was previously -.15 mm

          My 3D Printing blog: http://www.sublimelayers.com
          Coming this summer: "3D Printing Strategies - the art of perfecting your designs and prints"

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators
            last edited by

            I think that reduction in trigger height was spurious, nothing to do with the firmware upgrade. If anything, the trigger height should be higher using 1.18, not lower.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • mhackneyundefined
              mhackney
              last edited by

              I've gone through the printer mechanics and configs and it is still behaving as described. Multiple deletes of config-override and resets. It's almost as if G31 Z offset is not being applied.

              My 3D Printing blog: http://www.sublimelayers.com
              Coming this summer: "3D Printing Strategies - the art of perfecting your designs and prints"

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • mhackneyundefined
                mhackney
                last edited by

                David, I downgraded to 1.17 and my original Z offset is working perfectly. I'll re-convert to 1.18 when I get time early this week and try again.

                My 3D Printing blog: http://www.sublimelayers.com
                Coming this summer: "3D Printing Strategies - the art of perfecting your designs and prints"

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dc42undefined
                  dc42 administrators
                  last edited by

                  Michael, have you tried printing using 1.18 and your old height offset?

                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators
                    last edited by

                    @mhackney:

                    I've gone through the printer mechanics and configs and it is still behaving as described. Multiple deletes of config-override and resets. It's almost as if G31 Z offset is not being applied.

                    That can happen if you put the G31 command earlier in config.g than the M558 command. This is because RRF stores different G31 parameters for different types of Z probe, to allow you to use more than one probe.

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • mhackneyundefined
                      mhackney
                      last edited by

                      @dc42:

                      Michael, have you tried printing using 1.18 and your old height offset?

                      David, yes that is actually what I was trying to articulate above. With the same height offset I had to baby step down an additional 0.20mm. If I then change my height offset to -.35mm I STILL have to baby step down .20mm. That's what's strange. I see your second post about order so let me verify that, although once committed to config-override.g the correct order is captured, correct?

                      My 3D Printing blog: http://www.sublimelayers.com
                      Coming this summer: "3D Printing Strategies - the art of perfecting your designs and prints"

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • mhackneyundefined
                        mhackney
                        last edited by

                        @dc42:

                        @mhackney:

                        I've gone through the printer mechanics and configs and it is still behaving as described. Multiple deletes of config-override and resets. It's almost as if G31 Z offset is not being applied.

                        That can happen if you put the G31 command earlier in config.g than the M558 command. This is because RRF stores different G31 parameters for different types of Z probe, to allow you to use more than one probe.

                        Understood and I do have them in the correct order. I actually take advantage of the ability to support different probes on one of my test machines that has the IR probe, FSRs and an accelerometer probe on it so I can do comparisons. On this machine I have:

                        [[language]]
                        ; Z probe and compensation definition
                        M558 P4 X0 Y0 Z0 F250 H3 I1 T3500
                        
                        ; grid compensation
                        M557 R110 S15
                        
                        G31 T4 X0 Y0 Z-.20			; Set the z probe offset and threshold
                        
                        

                        My 3D Printing blog: http://www.sublimelayers.com
                        Coming this summer: "3D Printing Strategies - the art of perfecting your designs and prints"

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators
                          last edited by

                          As long as you had the correct probe type selected when you sent the G31 command, then M500 will save it correctly in config-override.g. The G31 commands in that file use the T parameter to say what probe type they refer to. As far as I know, that parameter works correctly. If you suspect it doesn't, run G31 Tn where n is your probe type (as in M558 P parameter) and it will tell you the trigger height that it is using.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • mhackneyundefined
                            mhackney
                            last edited by

                            Today I built a new CF card from a backup set of config files I had. I turned off the printer, installed the new card and restarted. Verified that there was no config-override.g, checked my offsets, Z height and other calibration settings. All looked good. Calibrated, looked good (0.01 deviation) then I verified height and it seemed spot on. Started a print and the first layer looks fine. I'm waiting for it (1 layer) to complete so I can verify thickness.

                            But it does seem like I must have displeased the 3D Printing Deities this weekend and now I'm back in good standing.

                            My 3D Printing blog: http://www.sublimelayers.com
                            Coming this summer: "3D Printing Strategies - the art of perfecting your designs and prints"

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • sLpFhaWKundefined
                              sLpFhaWK
                              last edited by

                              hopefully my red head sacrifice takes hold and the gods will be pleased with me. we'll find out tomorrow, I don't wish to pursue any 3d printing tonight.

                              -sLpFhaWK
                              Ultibots K250v
                              Rostock Max v2 Soon to be Full MetalMax
                              Mini Kossel

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA