Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Need to lower the nozzle

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    6
    72
    4.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Kolbiundefined
      Kolbi @fcwilt
      last edited by Kolbi

      @fcwilt said in Need to lower the nozzle:

      Why are you multiplying by -1 rather than just subtracting?

      😂 Yeah... as we were talking the mechanics of it at work, that was the outcome... lmao

      But... it's all the same.

      ; 0:/macros/Save-Z
      ; This macro adds the current babystep offset to the Z trigger height and saves it to config-overide.g
      ; ! M501 needs to be in config.g to automatically be recalled on reset. If using multiple filament settings,
      ; and this is for a specific filament type, recommend placing this yielded information in the filament's config.g.
       
      if move.axes[2].babystep !=0                                ; If no babysteps are currently adjusted - exit routine
         echo {"OLD: " ^ sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight ^ " NEW: " ^ sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight - move.axes[2].babystep}
         G31 Z{sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight - move.axes[2].babystep}
         echo {"Place either M501 -or- G31 Z" ^ sensors.probes[0].triggerHeight - move.axes[2].babystep) ^ " in your config.g."}
         M500 P10:31                                              ; save settings to config-overide.g - G31 P31 saves trigger height, 
      	                                                    ; trigger value, and X and Y offsets for each possible Z probe type. 
      							    ; P10 parameter saves the G10 tool offsets.
       
      else
         echo "Baby stepping is not currently employed, exiting."
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jens55undefined
        jens55
        last edited by jens55

        Why are you writing to config-overide.g rather than directly to config.g? Is it simply because there is no mechanism to write to another file name?
        Also, my config.g specifies an offset of +3.75. When I test run the macro with a babystep value of -0.05 I end up with a total offset of +3.80 which seems odd (I was expecting +3.70) ... but then this could be because of my general confusion about adding or subtracting babysteps.

        Kolbiundefined fcwiltundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Elvis0zundefined
          Elvis0z
          last edited by

          I writing to config.g

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Kolbiundefined
            Kolbi @jens55
            last edited by Kolbi

            @jens55 I'm not sure that you could directly edit the 0:/sys/config.g with the information. In the script about it uses M500 P10:31 to save the particulars to the override file, will be pulled into the config.g processing so long as M501 is present within it.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Elvis0zundefined
              Elvis0z
              last edited by Elvis0z

              Do you have to to M501 at the end of the config.g. Ahhh just read the code in your macro

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jens55undefined
                jens55
                last edited by

                Thanks. I am not up to speed with the newfangled programming stuff so I was not sure.

                Kolbiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Kolbiundefined
                  Kolbi @jens55
                  last edited by

                  @jens55 No worries, I'm still getting up to speed too.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • fcwiltundefined
                    fcwilt @jens55
                    last edited by fcwilt

                    @jens55 said in Need to lower the nozzle:

                    Also, my config.g specifies an offset of +3.75. When I test run the macro with a babystep value of -0.05 I end up with a total offset of +3.80 which seems odd (I was expecting +3.70) ... but then this could be because of my general confusion about adding or subtracting babysteps.

                    A larger Z trigger height moves the nozzle closer to the bed.

                    A negative baby step offset value moves the nozzle closer to the bed.

                    The Z trigger height tells the firmware what the Z position is when the Z probe
                    triggers.

                    As to adding/subtracting:

                    If the trigger height is 5mm then to move to Z=0 the firmware has to move the nozzle 5mm closer to the bed.

                    If the trigger height is 10mm then to move to Z=0 the firmware has to move the nozzle 10mm closer to the bed.

                    So for a given trigger height if the nozzle at Z=0 is too far away from the bed the trigger height needs to be made larger to have the nozzle move closer to the bed.

                    Frederick

                    Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jens55undefined
                      jens55
                      last edited by

                      ROFL .... do you realize that you just short-circuited my brain?
                      Give me a few minutes to re-boot and I will be operational again.
                      I knew I shouldn't have asked .....

                      I am not in front of the printer but I will try things 'live' tomorrow to see if I can understand it 😞

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • fcwiltundefined
                        fcwilt
                        last edited by

                        Hi,

                        OK how about this.

                        If the Z trigger height is set to 5mm but the Z position when the probe triggers is actually 6mm (because the trigger height value is wrong) when the firmware moves the 5mm to what it thinks is Z=0 the actual position will be Z=1.

                        Frederick

                        Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jens55undefined
                          jens55
                          last edited by

                          Thanks for trying but the only way this will sink in is if I do it myself directly on the printer!

                          Kolbiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Kolbiundefined
                            Kolbi @jens55
                            last edited by Kolbi

                            @jens55 How about this: What the probe trigger height is doing, is telling the system how far away from the bed it detects contact. So if I'm blind folded and have a stick that is 1 meter long, and touch the wall infront of me with it - I know I can move an additional meter towards the wall and not smash my face, but just have my nose touch it.
                            But if someone TOLD me my stick is 1.5 meter long, but in reality it is still a 1 meter long stick - I'd smash my face because I'd walk towards the wall an addition 1.5 meters from sensing the contact @ 1 meter.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jens55undefined
                              jens55
                              last edited by

                              The penny dropped, the light went on and things make sense.
                              Thank you kindly for all the help to get things through my thick scull!

                              Kolbiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Kolbiundefined
                                Kolbi @jens55
                                last edited by Kolbi

                                @jens55 Yeah - it made my brain mushy and I had to get a drink. It always seems backwards to me also, natural to think smaller number will be smaller distance between the two I guess. Both of us got schooled by @fcwilt 👨‍🏫

                                fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Elvis0zundefined
                                  Elvis0z
                                  last edited by

                                  Well that clears that up. lol thanks for the info and the macro.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • fcwiltundefined
                                    fcwilt @Kolbi
                                    last edited by

                                    @Kolbi said in Need to lower the nozzle:

                                    it made my brain mushy and I had to get a drink.

                                    Perhaps that is why you are walking into walls?

                                    😉

                                    Frederick

                                    Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • OwenDundefined
                                      OwenD
                                      last edited by

                                      The math (or logic) in my original posted macro was incorrect.
                                      The baby-stepping value should be subtracted from the trigger height, not added.
                                      Macro shown above is correct.
                                      I should have stated that I had not tested it as I personally see no value in working this way.
                                      It was hastily done just to show the OP that it could be done.
                                      I have corrected the original post.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • jens55undefined
                                        jens55
                                        last edited by

                                        I am really glad to know that confusion about these measurements is not a rare phenomenon 🙂

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Baenwortundefined
                                          Baenwort
                                          last edited by

                                          I found the blog post at https://www.sublimelayers.com/2017/05/fdffsd.html?m=1 helpful when I was learning what trigger height means and how it changes.

                                          He posts still in some of the Delta communities and the visuals really help one understand. With the FSR and Smart Effector style probes the understanding is key and confusing with all the negative values.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • jens55undefined
                                            jens55
                                            last edited by

                                            BIG issue with the macro.
                                            Not sure what happened but somehow or other my z offset got set to z 395.xx with the obvious " Let's see if we can run the nozzle to China".
                                            Thankfully nothing broke.
                                            I haven't figured out as everything seems to run just fine if you run the macro just once. I did run into another issue though:
                                            If you run the macro multiple times without changing the babysteps, it will merely add onto the previous saved value of the z offset. The macro needs to reset the babysteps to zero before it exits.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA