Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Homing vs. Printing height difference

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    3
    25
    856
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fcwiltundefined
      fcwilt
      last edited by

      Hi,

      On line 35 you have M208 Z215.4 S0 - according to the docs deltas don't use that form of the command.

      On line 39 you have the trigger height as Z15.3 - is that accurate?

      If it is try changing the H parameter in line 38 to H20 just as a test.

      Frederick

      Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • 1d1undefined
        1d1
        last edited by

        OK. Corrected those issues. I tried them with those commands to see if it would help. I now get a "Z probe not triggered during " a G32 command. I'll check my wiring I guess though it was working before I installed the Duet. Hmmmm

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • 1d1undefined
          1d1
          last edited by

          Wiring triggers properly at the board. Maybe increase the trigger height even more? I'll try that...

          fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fcwiltundefined
            fcwilt @1d1
            last edited by

            @1d1 said in Homing vs. Printing height difference:

            Wiring triggers properly at the board. Maybe increase the trigger height even more? I'll try that...

            Is that 15.3 value correct?

            That value is supposed to be the Z position when the probe triggers.

            Frederick

            Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

            jay_s_ukundefined 1d1undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jay_s_ukundefined
              jay_s_uk @fcwilt
              last edited by

              @fcwilt I'm guessing it's a delta (probably an anycubic one) in which case that z probe offset is about right

              Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1d1undefined
                1d1 @fcwilt
                last edited by

                @fcwilt That is what the indicated Z height is when the probe triggers. When I then check the distance to the bed, it requires an additional -4.9mm for the nozzle to reach printing height. Yeah, the distance the printer attempts to print is likely 4.9mm above the bed. This where I'm confused, exactly.

                fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 1d1undefined
                  1d1
                  last edited by

                  That is, -4.9 from Z0

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • fcwiltundefined
                    fcwilt @1d1
                    last edited by

                    @1d1 said in Homing vs. Printing height difference:

                    @fcwilt That is what the indicated Z height is when the probe triggers. When I then check the distance to the bed, it requires an additional -4.9mm for the nozzle to reach printing height. Yeah, the distance the printer attempts to print is likely 4.9mm above the bed. This where I'm confused, exactly.

                    The indicated height is simply the value you entered into the G31 command. It is "telling" the firmware that the nozzle is 15.3 mm above the bed when the probe triggers.

                    If it is actually 15.3 + 4.9 use that value instead.

                    Frederick

                    Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • 1d1undefined
                      1d1
                      last edited by

                      When I do that (for the 10th time) I get a probe not triggered response when running a G32. I know the probe triggers when pushed because the LED on the board goes off. If I increase that trigger value, it still doesn't work because the probe remains too high. If I decrease the trigger height value to 15.22 I get a calibrated mean deviation response after G32. All Good. I then enter an M500 to save it. And when I go to print, The extruder prints in midair about 4.9mm above the bed.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jay_s_ukundefined
                        jay_s_uk
                        last edited by

                        How did you measure the trigger height?

                        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1d1undefined
                          1d1
                          last edited by

                          I take the indicated difference from the point at which the probe triggers, remove the probe, and then lower the extruder until the nozzle touches the bed. The total distance is appx. 20mm (15.3 + 4.9). When using that value, the probe doesn't trigger when G32 is used. If I lower the trigger height value to 15.4, the probe triggers. Then I get a mean deviation report, hit M500, and go to print... 4.9 mm above the bed... again. Pretty frustrated here.

                          fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • fcwiltundefined
                            fcwilt @1d1
                            last edited by

                            @1d1

                            If you home the printer and then move to Z=0 where does the nozzle end up, height wise?

                            Frederick

                            Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1d1undefined
                              1d1
                              last edited by

                              4.53mm above the bed

                              jay_s_ukundefined fcwiltundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jay_s_ukundefined
                                jay_s_uk @1d1
                                last edited by

                                @1d1 have you read this?https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Calibrating_a_delta_printer#Section_Measuring_the_trigger_height

                                Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                                1d1undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • fcwiltundefined
                                  fcwilt @1d1
                                  last edited by fcwilt

                                  @1d1 said in Homing vs. Printing height difference:

                                  4.53mm above the bed

                                  Do you have a line like this in your config-override.g file?

                                  M665 R106.35 L215 B180.8 H224.5 ;Set delta radius, diagonal rod length, printable radius and homed height

                                  If you do change the H parameter to H229.4

                                  If not change that line in your config.g file.

                                  Then re-boot, home and move to Z=0 and see what happens.

                                  Frederick

                                  Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                                  1d1undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • 1d1undefined
                                    1d1 @jay_s_uk
                                    last edited by

                                    @jay_s_uk Many times.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 1d1undefined
                                      1d1 @fcwilt
                                      last edited by

                                      @fcwilt I'll try that. Though I have already in the past, maybe we're closer to the solution...

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • jay_s_ukundefined
                                        jay_s_uk
                                        last edited by

                                        Well you're doing to z probe offset the wrong way.

                                        Heat the bed
                                        Heat the nozzle
                                        Take the nozzle down until it's touching the bed (using paper to determine when they're touching)
                                        G92 Z0
                                        G1 Z30 (to move the nozzle away from the bed)
                                        Fit the probe
                                        G30 S-1

                                        And the offset will be spat out

                                        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                                        fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • fcwiltundefined
                                          fcwilt @jay_s_uk
                                          last edited by

                                          @jay_s_uk

                                          That is certainly one way but it is not the only way.

                                          Frederick

                                          Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                                          jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1d1undefined
                                            1d1
                                            last edited by

                                            OK. Adding 5mm to my overall homing height didn't alter results, but I left it that way and did the G92 Z0 process again and we have ignition. A number was spat, changes were splatted and results regurgitated. PETG flows properly once again. Thank you both (all?) for your help.

                                            fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA