Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Homing vs. Printing height difference

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    3
    25
    855
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fcwiltundefined
      fcwilt @1d1
      last edited by

      @1d1

      If you home the printer and then move to Z=0 where does the nozzle end up, height wise?

      Frederick

      Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • 1d1undefined
        1d1
        last edited by

        4.53mm above the bed

        jay_s_ukundefined fcwiltundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jay_s_ukundefined
          jay_s_uk @1d1
          last edited by

          @1d1 have you read this?https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Calibrating_a_delta_printer#Section_Measuring_the_trigger_height

          Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

          1d1undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fcwiltundefined
            fcwilt @1d1
            last edited by fcwilt

            @1d1 said in Homing vs. Printing height difference:

            4.53mm above the bed

            Do you have a line like this in your config-override.g file?

            M665 R106.35 L215 B180.8 H224.5 ;Set delta radius, diagonal rod length, printable radius and homed height

            If you do change the H parameter to H229.4

            If not change that line in your config.g file.

            Then re-boot, home and move to Z=0 and see what happens.

            Frederick

            Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

            1d1undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • 1d1undefined
              1d1 @jay_s_uk
              last edited by

              @jay_s_uk Many times.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1d1undefined
                1d1 @fcwilt
                last edited by

                @fcwilt I'll try that. Though I have already in the past, maybe we're closer to the solution...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jay_s_ukundefined
                  jay_s_uk
                  last edited by

                  Well you're doing to z probe offset the wrong way.

                  Heat the bed
                  Heat the nozzle
                  Take the nozzle down until it's touching the bed (using paper to determine when they're touching)
                  G92 Z0
                  G1 Z30 (to move the nozzle away from the bed)
                  Fit the probe
                  G30 S-1

                  And the offset will be spat out

                  Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                  fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • fcwiltundefined
                    fcwilt @jay_s_uk
                    last edited by

                    @jay_s_uk

                    That is certainly one way but it is not the only way.

                    Frederick

                    Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                    jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • 1d1undefined
                      1d1
                      last edited by

                      OK. Adding 5mm to my overall homing height didn't alter results, but I left it that way and did the G92 Z0 process again and we have ignition. A number was spat, changes were splatted and results regurgitated. PETG flows properly once again. Thank you both (all?) for your help.

                      fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • fcwiltundefined
                        fcwilt @1d1
                        last edited by

                        @1d1 said in Homing vs. Printing height difference:

                        OK. Adding 5mm to my overall homing height didn't alter results, but I left it that way and did the G92 Z0 process again and we have ignition. A number was spat, changes were splatted and results regurgitated. PETG flows properly once again. Thank you both (all?) for your help.

                        Adding the 5, reboot, home and still Z=0 came out at 4.9? Very odd.

                        Well, anyway, don't leave us in suspense - what number was "spat"?

                        Frederick

                        Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jay_s_ukundefined
                          jay_s_uk @fcwilt
                          last edited by

                          @fcwilt thats what it says to do on the wiki

                          Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                          fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • fcwiltundefined
                            fcwilt @jay_s_uk
                            last edited by

                            @jay_s_uk said in Homing vs. Printing height difference:

                            @fcwilt thats what it says to do on the wiki

                            I understand and it is a perfectly fine solution.

                            Frederick

                            Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1d1undefined
                              1d1
                              last edited by

                              Sorry - had to step away. The homing height in M558 is locked at 229.4 and the number spat is 19.43. Still needs a teensy bit of fine tuning, but the grand picture includes printing again.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA