Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Giant Delta printer Slow Homing issue.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    My Duet controlled machine
    8
    84
    3.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dc42undefined
      dc42 administrators
      last edited by dc42

      Please post the exact M569 command you used with P5, P6, P7 and P8.

      The "horrible noise" you mentioned might be caused by the motors recognising the commands but trying to move too fast, because of an error in the steps/mm setting, or the microstepping setting you are using on the external driver.

      What switch settings are you using on those drivers?

      Have you tested the motors individually as described at https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/ConfiguringRepRapFirmwareDeltaPrinter#Section_Testing_the_motors_and_endstops_individually ?

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      sozkanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • sozkanundefined
        sozkan @dc42
        last edited by sozkan

        @dc42
        These are the present settings working smoothly after home.

        ; Drives
        M569 P5 S0 R0 T3:3:5:0                                       ; Extruder drive 0 goes Forward
        M569 P2 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6  ; X:A drive 1 goes Forward
        M569 P3 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6  ; Y:B drive 2 goes Forward
        M569 P4 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6  ; Z:C physical drive 3 goes Forward
        
        M584 X6 Y7 Z8 E5                                  			 ; set drive mapping
        M350 X0 Y0 Z0 E0 I0                                ; configure microstepping without interpolation
        
        M92 X114.29 Y114.29 Z114.29 E274.00                   ; set steps per mm (400/140) * 40 = 114.2857 ;; 400 step per rev ;; 140 mm one rev pulley ;;1:40 ratio gearbox 
        
        

        I have tested individual axis as well both with these settings and another (Correct) one as well.
        However, I will do another youtube video to show you how it behaves.

        Steps / mm value is no different than earlier. Because I have added a locked 1:40 gearbox to keep axis from freefall.

        Switch settings on driver 400 pulse/revolution.

        sozkanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • sozkanundefined
          sozkan @sozkan
          last edited by

          @sozkan
          Hello,
          I have made a video on youtube to compare drive mapping the working accidental settings and recommended settings P values.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJFbPPyj9F0

          By the way, I keep the Extruder value( P5) as recommended. However, the extruder doesn't sound like cracking, but not calibrated moves in both settings. Since I don't know if the manufacturer (Dyze) gives the right settings, I don`t worry about the extruder now.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • sozkanundefined
            sozkan
            last edited by

            Here the individual axis trial video on Youtube,

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fNw1B7A73g

            Accidental or Illegal parameters on P values trial:

            ; Drives
            M569 P5 S0 R0 T3:3:5:0; Extruder drive 0 goes Forward
            M569 P1 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; X: A drive 1 goes Forward
            M569 P2 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; Y: B drive 2 goes Forward
            M569 P3 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; Z: C physical drive 3 goes Forward
            M584 X6 Y7 Z8 E5    
            M350 X0 Y0 Z0 E0 I0; configure microstepping without interpolation
            

            As Summary:
            These setting working smooth, but before home, G1 command working smoothly on all axis like;

            
            G91                         ; relative positioning
            G1 H2 X-100 Y-100 Z-100 F1000; go down a few mm
            
            

            But when individual command sent, It does not work correctly, like these command;

            
            G91; relative positioning
            G1 H2 X-100 F1000; go down a few mm
            
            

            Recommended Parameters on P values trial :

            ; Drives
            M569 P5 S0 R0 T3:3:5:0    ; Extruder drive 0 goes Forward
            M569 P6 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6  ; X:A drive 1 goes Forward
            M569 P7 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6  ; Y:B drive 2 goes Forward
            M569 P8 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6  ; Z:C physical drive 3 goes Forward
            M584 X6 Y7 Z8 E5    
            M350 X0 Y0 Z0 E0 I0; configure microstepping without interpolation
            

            All the move commands work the same with the only problem, the horrible sound(sign for incorrect steps), and incorrect calibration distance. It is basically running a shorter distance than the previous parameter.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jay_s_ukundefined
              jay_s_uk
              last edited by

              can you also post a picture of the switch settings on the drivers please

              Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

              sozkanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jay_s_ukundefined
                jay_s_uk
                last edited by

                and using 0 in M350 is invalid.
                A value of at least 1 should be used for all axis. e.g.

                M350 X1 Y1 Z1 E1 I0
                

                https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M350_Set_microstepping_mode

                Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                sozkanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • sozkanundefined
                  sozkan @jay_s_uk
                  last edited by

                  @jay_s_uk said in Giant Delta printer Slow Homing issue.:

                  can you also post a picture of the switch settings on the drivers please

                  Default means 400 steps/Rev

                  WhatsApp Image 2020-11-12 at 11.42.47.jpeg WhatsApp Image 2020-11-12 at 11.42.47 (1).jpeg

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • sozkanundefined
                    sozkan @jay_s_uk
                    last edited by

                    @jay_s_uk said in Giant Delta printer Slow Homing issue.:

                    M350 X1 Y1 Z1 E1 I0
                    It did not make difference. incorrect steps remain in this mode.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jay_s_ukundefined
                      jay_s_uk
                      last edited by

                      you've got the drivers set to 400 steps per mm, and i believe originally, you were looking at using 3200 steps per mm.
                      have you tried switching back to that?
                      That should reduce the amount of noise you are hearing

                      Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                      sozkanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • sozkanundefined
                        sozkan @jay_s_uk
                        last edited by

                        @jay_s_uk said in Giant Delta printer Slow Homing issue.:

                        you've got the drivers set to 400 steps per mm, and i believe originally, you were looking at using 3200 steps per mm.
                        have you tried switching back to that?
                        That should reduce the amount of noise you are hearing

                        It was actually the previous setup. The sound and problem with the same setting remained at 3200 settings.

                        The reason 400 setting is on, I have added a 1:40 Gearbox. Therefore, 400 was an appropriate setting.

                        The new setup;

                        M92 X114.29 Y114.29 Z114.29 E274.00                   ; set steps per mm (400/140) * 40 = 114.2857 ; 400 step per rev ;; 140 mm one rev pulley ;1:40 ratio gearbox 
                        

                        However, It could be higher steps/mm with smoother settings variation, I would try. But Due to the high gearbox, it needs high-speed rotation to need on the motor. So, the lower step is lesser the signal density.

                        But the actual issue is not noise. Hearing noise is just a sign.
                        The actual issue is within the recommended P values noise into the signal output of the breakout board. I can connect an oscilloscope to prove it. Some missing steps cause less travel than the actual distance.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • sozkanundefined
                          sozkan
                          last edited by

                          The Motor Control Problem resolved! ( interns of calibration and successful machine move ) ( But I still need your valuable help on bed calibration Should I open a new thread?)

                          Thank you very much for all your contribution.

                          Solution: I have just upgraded to the latest beta Firmware and DWC.

                          Conclusion:
                          But the configuration remains as (P 2-3-4) I was using. The recommended P 5-6-7-8 values causing problems. If it is not an issue with "Duet 2 Wifi r.104" It is something with the firmware I believe.

                          The Problem with recommended configuration P-values causing missing steps and noisy move. Each axis even the same amount moves command, they move different distances.

                          By the accidentally found settings and new Firmware update problem is over!

                          So this is the code that is working so far:

                          ; Drives
                          M569 P5 S0 R0 T3:3:5:0; Extruder drive 0 goes Forward
                          M569 P2 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; X: A drive 1 goes Forward
                          M569 P3 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; Y: B drive 2 goes Forward
                          M569 P4 S1 R0 T2.5:2.5:6:6; Z: C physical drive 3 goes Forward
                          
                          M584 X6 Y7 Z8 E5; set drive mapping
                          M350 X1 Y1 Z1 E1 I1; configure microstepping without interpolation
                          
                          M92 X114.29 Y114.29 Z114.29 E274.00                   ; set steps per mm (400/140) * 40 = 114.2857 ;; 400 step per rev ;; 140 mm one rev pulley ;;1:40 ratio gearbox 
                          
                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • sozkanundefined sozkan referenced this topic
                          • sozkanundefined sozkan referenced this topic
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA