• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Height map makes my bed look warped…Why???

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Tuning and tweaking
5
28
4.3k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    Aflac01
    last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 20:05

    Calibrated 7 factors using 17 points, deviation before 1.540 after 1.047

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Aflac01
      last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 20:06

      so in the ball park of not good

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 20:09

        I guess it's a delta then. What M557 command do you use to define the grid? In the bed.g file that you use for auto calibration, are you using trigger height corrections on the G30 command?

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          number40fan
          last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 20:21

          dc42, do you have your config, override and bed file posted anywhere? I have always wanted to take a look at them.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            Aflac01
            last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 20:39

            yes, its a Delta, that probably would have been good info to include in my original post, built using trick laser max metal frame.

            M557 R125 S20

            At one point when i was using fsr under beds i tried height corrections. Just looking at it i found that somehow i must have fat finged something in because one point had a 0.2 and one point had a 6 correction in it, all the rest where zero. fixed them all to zero and it changed it to this.

            Calibrated 7 factors using 17 points, deviation before 0.686 after 0.224

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              Aflac01
              last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 20:54

              ok, cleared out my config override file and tried againl

              things look better, but that height map still looks odd to me? am i getting into normal now or do i have something else going on?

              Calibrated 6 factors using 17 points, deviation before 0.126 after 0.125

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                number40fan
                last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 21:01

                Want to give 9 factors a shot?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  Aflac01
                  last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 21:10

                  i thought it only went to 7

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    number40fan
                    last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 21:13

                    Nope, all the way to 9.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      Forgvn77
                      last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 21:22

                      I ran into more issues when I calibrated over 6 factors. Six ended up working great for me. More wasn't better in this case when I set up my delta. The trigger height corrections are what you'll need to establish and plug in. Once you get those nailed, you'll be off and running.

                      Velleman K8200, Geeetech G2S Pro (x2), Geeetech Rostock 301 retrofitted with Duet
                      Make A Difference!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        Aflac01
                        last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 21:31

                        9 factors is looking better for me

                        im using a piezo in the print head so i have no variation in trigger height

                        Calibrated 9 factors using 17 points, deviation before 0.159 after 0.034

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          number40fan
                          last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 21:33

                          That's a lot better. What are your M665 and M666 changes?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            Aflac01
                            last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 21:36

                            config has
                            M665 R135.59 L330.77 B135.59 H235.444
                            M666 X0 Y0 Z0

                            after calibration i got
                            M665 Diagonal 344.383, delta radius 138.954, homed height 235.472, bed radius 135.6, X -0.050°, Y -0.359°, Z 0.000°
                            M666 Endstop adjustments X-0.20 Y0.13 Z0.07, tilt X-0.23% Y0.22%

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • undefined
                              number40fan
                              last edited by 14 Aug 2017, 21:41

                              M500 will save that to override.g and if you have M501 at the end of your config.g, it'll use those settings.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • undefined
                                Aflac01
                                last edited by 15 Aug 2017, 01:53

                                so yes, 9 made the calibration look good, but it did not make it print good. back to 6 i guess

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • undefined
                                  number40fan
                                  last edited by 15 Aug 2017, 02:48

                                  What is wrong with the print?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • undefined
                                    Aflac01
                                    last edited by 15 Aug 2017, 04:16

                                    Things where great near the center, but out near the edges it went right off the bed. I guess it
                                    changing the arm length by 14mm was not the best

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • undefined
                                      number40fan
                                      last edited by 15 Aug 2017, 13:56

                                      How big is your bed?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • undefined
                                        Dougal1957
                                        last edited by 15 Aug 2017, 19:08

                                        try 8 factor cal

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • undefined
                                          Aflac01
                                          last edited by 16 Aug 2017, 00:44

                                          Is there a list somewhere of what the different factors are? i saw one once but it only went up to 7.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          12 out of 28
                                          • First post
                                            12/28
                                            Last post
                                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA