Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Theory: bed magnets bias inductive probes

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    4
    5
    247
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • kb58undefined
      kb58
      last edited by kb58

      I've been having a heck of a time getting consistent readings out of my Pinda2 probe (at least that's what it was advertised as). When I do a bed profile mesh, it's always failing and always in the same places. I rotated the steel sheet to see if the problem followed, and it does not. This is on a spring steel sheet sitting on a 8mm aluminum tooling plate with magnets sunk into it.

      I placed a machinist's straightedge on it and it's dead flat as expected, and then started wondering something...

      "What if" some magnetic flux is getting through the steel sheet. If the inductive probe happens to probe right over a magnet, I wonder of that flux would bias the trigger height. Has anyone else seen or heard of this as a factor? I may try an experiment where I do multiple trigger height tests approaching a magnet and see what happens.

      I've been battling this probe's varying readings long enough that I ordered a BLTouch, just to see if I can get some consistency. I'd like to stick with a no contact inductive sensor but am not sure I can trust what I've got.

      Scratch-built 350mmx350mm coreXY, linear rails, ballscrews, 3 Z axis, Duet3 6HC, v3.3, Tool Board v1.1, BondTech LGX + Mosquito hot end

      o_lampeundefined PCRundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • o_lampeundefined
        o_lampe @kb58
        last edited by

        @kb58
        I'm not sure if magnetism plays a role here, but the 'permeability?' of the magnet material is different for aluminum tooling plate, so you will get different readings. Same applies to (countersunk) screwheads. Even when they are flush to the bed surface, they 'pop out' in the heightmap.
        Only way out is to use IR probe or BLTouch or not probing around the objects

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • PCRundefined
          PCR @kb58
          last edited by

          @kb58 thats why the MK3 only probing where non magnets are

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • kb58undefined
            kb58
            last edited by kb58

            Just to add a conclusion. Swapped in a BLTouch, and all bed related issues vanished. It was indeed the bed magnets messing with the inductive sensor. FWIW, I have a spring steel sheet on top of the build bed, and thought it would shield the bed sensor for any variations in the perceived surface, but guess not!

            Scratch-built 350mmx350mm coreXY, linear rails, ballscrews, 3 Z axis, Duet3 6HC, v3.3, Tool Board v1.1, BondTech LGX + Mosquito hot end

            fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • fcwiltundefined
              fcwilt @kb58
              last edited by

              @kb58 said in Theory: bed magnets bias inductive probes:

              Just to add a conclusion. Swapped in a BLTouch, and all bed related issues vanished. It was indeed the bed magnets messing with the inductive sensor. FWIW, I have a spring steel sheet on top of the build bed, and thought it would shield the bed sensor for any variations in the perceived surface, but guess not!

              There are magnetic systems that use a flexible magnetic material which does not seem to interfere with inductive sensors but the ones I have seen have a temp limit.

              Frederick

              Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA