Easier way to test if homed?

theolodian

@stephen6309 I was hoping that after the first G28 everything else would pass the test?

dc42

@theolodian said in Easier way to test if homed?:

@stephen6309 I was hoping that after the first G28 everything else would pass the test?

Yes, that should be the case.

Here's another way (not tested!):

var allHomed=true
while iterations < #move.axes & move.axes[iterations].visible
  if !move.axes[iterations].homed
    set var.allHomed=false
    break
if !var.allHomed
  G28

Stephen6309

@theolodian You're right, I didn't think it all the way through. My addition would make it home each one at a time.

Stephen6309

@dc42 Doesn't work. Printer not homed, run macro, allHome is set to false, but it's true after exiting the loop. 3.4.0.rc1

The allHomed needs to be changed to var.allHomed in line 4 and 6, or you get an error.

Change line 4 to G28, remove 1, 6 and 7, and it works.

zapta

@stephen6309 said in Easier way to test if homed?:

The allHomed needs to be changed to var.allHomed in line 4 and 6, or you get an error.

Or just drop allHome all together?

while iterations < #move.axes & move.axes[iterations].visible
  if !move.axes[iterations].homed
    G28
    break

dc42

@stephen6309 said in Easier way to test if homed?:

@dc42 Doesn't work. Printer not homed, run macro, allHome is set to false, but it's true after exiting the loop. 3.4.0.rc1

The allHomed needs to be changed to var.allHomed in line 4 and 6, or you get an error.

Change line 4 to G28, remove 1, 6 and 7, and it works.

Thanks, I have made some corrections to that post.

OwenD

@dc42
Out of curiosity, what are the rules with regards to hiding axes?
Your macro would break out of the loop upon the first hidden axis (without necessarily having homed)
So presumably if you had axes 0..12, you can't hide say 6 & 7 and leave 8 through 12 visible?
Or should the macro loop contain something like

if !move.axes[iterations].visible
     continue

prior to G28?

dc42

@owend the M584 command allows you to make the first P axes visible and hide all higher numbered axes.

theolodian

@dc42 said in Easier way to test if homed?:

@owend the M584 command allows you to make the first P axes visible and hide all higher numbered axes.

The inference being that if you have hidden axes then you probably don't care to home them, say extruders, etc.? Thanks.

zapta

@theolodian said in Easier way to test if homed?:

The inference being that if you have hidden axes then you probably don't care to home them, say extruders, etc.? Thanks.

When I open the object model in DWC, it shows in the move section only x,y,z. Is E is also there in the move section of the object model but is hidden by DWC?

dc42

@zapta the axes are described in move.axes and the extruders in move.extruders.

OwenD

@theolodian said in Easier way to test if homed?:

@dc42 said in Easier way to test if homed?:

@owend the M584 command allows you to make the first P axes visible and hide all higher numbered axes.

The inference being that if you have hidden axes then you probably don't care to home them, say extruders, etc.? Thanks.

Well not extruders, but you may have defined axes to allow you to perform certain tasks at startup which are then hidden during normal running.
My question was just whether those hidden axes numbers could fall in the middle of a range.
Since it doesn't appear that this is possible, it is safe to cease testing axes for their homed state once a hidden axes is found in the array.

theolodian

@owend Ugh, different problem. Homing always comes back as failed when using these lower case letters for axes.

It does work fine if everything is already homed.

; If the bed hasn't been homed, home it
; Iterative loop across all defined move axes
while iterations < #move.axes
	if !move.axes[iterations].homed
			G28
			if result != 0
				abort "Homing failed"
			break

OwenD

@theolodian
I don't know why the axis letters would matter.
Are any axes hidden?
May be a question for @dc42

theolodian

@owend It has never worked correctly, there are still a variety of issues with using lower case letters for axes. Thanks.

dc42

@theolodian said in Easier way to test if homed?:

@owend It has never worked correctly, there are still a variety of issues with using lower case letters for axes. Thanks.

If you don't tell us what these issues are, we can't fix them.

zapta

@theolodian, are you referring to the various scripts here that test for homing? The all seem to use axis indexes rather than axis letters.

theolodian

@zapta said in Easier way to test if homed?:

@theolodian, are you referring to the various scripts here that test for homing? The all seem to use axis indexes rather than axis letters.

No, I am using lower case axis letters and homing always returns errors even though it works.

theolodian

@dc42 Are lower case axis letters supposed to work in SBC mode now? Should I try it again? We have just been using standalone mode.

chrishamm

@theolodian Lowercase letters are supported in the latest RC.