Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    True Bed Leveling (G32) leads to "inconsistent Z probe readings"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    General Discussion
    3
    9
    342
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FelixHundefined
      FelixH
      last edited by

      Hi all,

      I recently setup a new (cartesian) printer with a Duet 3 Mini 5+ Wifi in which in a first time for me I plugged the Z motors in different drivers and I setup the config.g and bed.g files so that I can use the G32 command for "True Bed Leveling".

      The printer is equipped with a Pinda2 clone, which works without problems as Z endstop and heigthmap compensation (G29).

      However, when I try to run the G32 command, it seems to work ok, but the console result is a "Inconsistent Z Probe reading".

      I thought at first it was a problem with the magnets on the bed, which is a Prusa clone with very strong magnets, so I did a test run sending the probe to positions where there is no magnet underneath (I saw problems with the heigthmap generation due to exactly that, which I solved by adjusting the probed area and intervals).

      Have anyone an idea on what could I be doing wrong? I have a very similar setup which works on another printer in which the bed is fitted with one of these magnet foil instead on magnets, that's what I thought this was the problem.

      For reference, the bed.g code, which I found here, is as follows:

      ; bed.g
      ; called to perform automatic bed compensation via G32
      ;
      ; generated by RepRapFirmware Configuration Tool v3.2.3 on Mon Mar 15 2021 19:09:36 GMT+0100 (Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit)
      M561                                                       ; Clear any existing bed transform.
      G28 ; home
      G1 Z220 F10000
      M558 F10000
      G30
      
      M558 F100 A5 S0.003
      G30 P0 X40 Y60 Z-99999 ; probe near a leadscrew, half way along Y axis
      G30 P1 X210 Y60 Z-99999 S2 ; probe near a leadscrew and calibrate 2 motors
      
      M558 F200 A1
      
      G1 X10 Y210 Z10 F10000
      
      gloomyandyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Former User?
        A Former User
        last edited by A Former User

        Are you using one of the below couplers or similar to attach your leadscrews? If not are you sure everything is tight? In either case as the z stepper motor moves to raise one side of your X beam if there is any slop or ability to move on the other sides leadscrew it will also raise negating any adjustment you made. That drove me crazy when I was working on a similar type printer.

        If that is what is happening the fix is to change them to rigid couplers. If you have oldhams or similar they should be OK. I have true oldhams in mine and they do not seem to affect the g32 leveling. I know they sometimes call the 2nd coupler in the picture an oldham but it is not one.

        z coupler.jpg

        A Former User? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • gloomyandyundefined
          gloomyandy @FelixH
          last edited by

          @FelixH said in True Bed Leveling (G32) leads to "inconsistent Z probe readings":

          M558 F100 A5 S0.003

          You are setting your probe to probe up to 5 times until it gets results that have a delta less than 0.003mm. The default is 0.03mm are you sure your probe can produce results that are that accurate?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Former User?
            A Former User @A Former User
            last edited by

            @KenW Another thing that can mess with G32 is having the Z steppers reversed, Z1 is actually Z2.

            FelixHundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FelixHundefined
              FelixH @A Former User
              last edited by

              @KenW I don't have any couplers. I have two of these motors with attached leadscrews

              I will look into having the motors inverted, but I believe they are on the right order.

              @gloomyandy I don't think it measures 5 times. I will look into it. As I said, I am following the example configuration I posted. The probe I am using is a PINDA2 clone. I have the same on the other printer in which the G32 works ok

              gloomyandyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • FelixHundefined
                FelixH
                last edited by

                I modified the bed.g to look like that:

                ; bed.g
                ; called to perform automatic bed compensation via G32
                ;
                ; generated by RepRapFirmware Configuration Tool v2.1.8 on Sat Mar 28 2020 22:27:48 GMT+0100 (Central European Standard Time)
                ; M561 ; clear any bed transform
                ; G29  ; probe the bed and enable compensation
                
                ; bed.g
                ; called to perform automatic bed compensation via G32
                ;
                ; generated by RepRapFirmware Configuration Tool v3.2.3 on Mon Mar 15 2021 19:09:36 GMT+0100 (Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit)
                M561                                                       ; Clear any existing bed transform.
                G28 ; home
                G1 Z75 F10000
                M558 F10000
                G30
                
                M558 F100 A5 S0.003
                
                ;G30 P0 X40 Y60 Z-99999 ; probe near a leadscrew, half way along Y axis
                ;G30 P1 X210 Y60 Z-99999 S2 ; probe near a leadscrew and calibrate 2 motors
                
                while true
                    G30 P0 X40 Y60 Z-99999 ; 											probe near a leadscrew, half way along Y axis
                    G30 P1 X210 Y60 Z-99999 S2 											; probe near a leadscrew and calibrate 2 motors
                    if abs(move.calibration.initial.mean) < 0.01 || iterations > 3
                        break
                
                M558 F200 A1
                
                G1 X10 Y10 Z10 F10000
                

                still throws the same error

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • FelixHundefined
                  FelixH
                  last edited by

                  well, I now modified the M558 command to:

                  M558 F100 A5 S0.004
                  

                  so that the tolerance is just a hair larger and it finally worked, somehow:

                   08/12/2023, 15:56:03 	Leadscrew adjustments made: -0.010 0.011, points used 2, (mean, deviation) before (0.000, 0.005) after (0.000, 0.000)
                  
                  08/12/2023, 15:55:52 	Leadscrew adjustments made: 0.040 -0.017, points used 2, (mean, deviation) before (0.013, 0.014) after (-0.000, 0.000)
                  
                  08/12/2023, 15:55:46 	Error: Z probe readings not consistent
                  

                  so @gloomyandy was on the right track. I will have to investigate further, however.

                  Thanks!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • gloomyandyundefined
                    gloomyandy @FelixH
                    last edited by

                    @FelixH It will probe up to five times. You can read the details here: https://docs.duet3d.com/en/User_manual/Reference/Gcodes#m558-set-z-probe-type
                    The error message you are seeing is because a series of probes failed to meet the accuracy (0.003mm) you specified. Try increasing the value to say 0.03mm (which is the default).

                    The probe accuracy is not just down to the probe it also depends on the mechanics of the printer,so it would not be unusual for two "identical" printers to have different results. Just because the setting works on whoever created the "example configuration"'s printer does not mean it will work on yours. Run some tests to see what sort of results you get from your probe and printer and adjust things (or fix things if the accuracy is not to your liking).

                    FelixHundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • FelixHundefined
                      FelixH @gloomyandy
                      last edited by

                      @gloomyandy yeah, got you! As I already checked, by setting the tolerance to 0.004 it did already the trick.

                      thanks a lot!

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • Phaedruxundefined Phaedrux marked this topic as a question
                      • Phaedruxundefined Phaedrux has marked this topic as solved
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA