Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Large format dual PH working in tandem?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    4
    5
    688
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FrankNPrinterundefined
      FrankNPrinter
      last edited by

      I am wondering if it is possible to build a large format machine along the lines of x = 4ft y = 4 ft and z = 2 ft I have a duet wifi now that i love in my FT5 chassis. I am wondering if it is capable of driving the 2 print heads to work on the same part together? If so, any limits to # of concurrent print heads +- expansion boards is my guess.
      just saw this and wow but no idea what hardware or software they are running. did notice they are using encoders on the motors too… question is, can the duet wifi run something like this on a smaller scale?
      https://www.youtube.com/embed/TkEOMQ6rQ6s

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by

        Is there an open source multi-head slicer yet, and if so, what output does it produce? That's the key part.

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T3P3Tonyundefined
          T3P3Tony administrators
          last edited by

          The building blocks are there in RepRapFirmware already. It is possible to configure multiple independent axis, and multiple extruders and have a single line of gcode drive both sets of independent axis, and both extruders at once. e.g.:

          G1 X100 Y100 U200 V200 E5:3

          As David says the issue is generating g code that:
          a) Works
          b) Is collision safe

          Fun job!

          www.duet3d.com

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GeckoBox3Dundefined
            GeckoBox3D
            last edited by

            The smaller you get, the more likely you are to get a collision as well. Its possible that each gantry in that machine simply has its own print space. When you slice the file, you simply slice 4 different sections.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T3P3Tonyundefined
              T3P3Tony administrators
              last edited by

              Yes that would work, add something in the slicer that varied those print spaces by layer so they took the same time to complete for each print head (or you would end up with idle print heads)

              www.duet3d.com

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA