Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Laser wiring?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    6
    26
    5.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • keyz182undefined
      keyz182 @dc42
      last edited by

      @dc42 Great, that's what I went with, and it works 🙂

      Thanks all for the help. I've got a bunch of cable management to do today, and once that's done, the real testing will begin. If the tests all work, I'll write it up and post it here for some vetting, and if it looks good, I (or someone) can put it up on the wifi 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • keyz182undefined
        keyz182
        last edited by

        Prepping the documentation here - https://gist.github.com/keyz182/34601ec4ba4a19c55a177d0d1738d5a3

        Any notes or corrections welcome. Once done and peer-reviewed I'll get it moved to the wiki.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • resamundefined
          resam
          last edited by

          Nice!

          I think you got the GND and V_IN connection mixed up on the LASER_OUT header...?

          keyz182undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • keyz182undefined
            keyz182 @resam
            last edited by

            @resam Good catch, fixed 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • keyz182undefined
              keyz182
              last edited by

              Just realised I selected the 74HCT02D, rather than the 74HCT02. It's datasheet claims it's both TTL and CMOS compatible.

              I ordered a few boards from JLPCB because I've never done board design before, and figured this would be a good start.

              I think it should work, as the output is dependent on VCC rather than anything else, and other than also having CMOS input compatibility, it seems the same. Can someone with more knowledge in electronic weigh in to say if it's a choice that'll work, or if I need to change it?

              T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T3P3Tonyundefined
                T3P3Tony administrators @keyz182
                last edited by T3P3Tony

                @keyz182 said in Laser wiring?:8

                74HCT02D

                should be fine, the datasheet shows the "D" to mean its SIOC foot print. What determines the logic levels is the HC/HCT (74HC02 vs 74HCT02)

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7400_series#7400_series_derivative_families

                www.duet3d.com

                keyz182undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • keyz182undefined
                  keyz182 @T3P3Tony
                  last edited by

                  @t3p3tony Awesome, thanks.

                  Do you think the "Circuit operational theory" section I just added looks correct? I want to make sure people are able to understand why they're doing something, not just that they should do it.

                  https://gist.github.com/keyz182/34601ec4ba4a19c55a177d0d1738d5a3

                  T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T3P3Tonyundefined
                    T3P3Tony administrators @keyz182
                    last edited by

                    by connecting the heater PWM to two input pins of the 74HCT02, we get an inversion of the PWM, such that when PWM out is pulled low, the 74HCT02 output is driven high.

                    This is a little confusing as written because the diagram shows PWM connected to only one input. maybe re-order the text so it is clear what the 3.3V is doing first?

                    www.duet3d.com

                    keyz182undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • keyz182undefined
                      keyz182 @T3P3Tony
                      last edited by

                      @t3p3tony rearranged slightly now - https://gist.github.com/keyz182/34601ec4ba4a19c55a177d0d1738d5a3

                      I still haven't been able to fully test this yet, I ran out usable filament to print a cable chain mount (I have ABS, but needed to use the room today).

                      Hopefully I'll get things all tested tomorrow, and can augment the guide with some examples of using e.g. Inkscape to do both vector and raster.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • keyz182undefined
                        keyz182
                        last edited by

                        Added to the wiki - https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Item/Using_a_PWM_driven_laser_module

                        T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T3P3Tonyundefined
                          T3P3Tony administrators @keyz182
                          last edited by

                          @keyz182 thanks, I moved it to a wiki page as it's not really an item:

                          https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Laser_PWM_control

                          www.duet3d.com

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • keyz182undefined
                            keyz182
                            last edited by

                            Can anyone recommend the best way to protect the signal from interference. The signal cable is running a total of about 1 meter alongside stepper cabling. I could run the cable separately, but would prefer to keeps it clean and together if possible.

                            I have plenty of shielded Cat5e/6 lying about, would that be fine? How best would I go about utilising the twisted pairs? Tie them together and treat the entire cable as 4 conductors, or e.g. pair signal and gnd? Or should I just experiment and see what works?

                            Also, does anyone have experience using Cat5e/6 for the steppers? I'd need to check the gauge on the stuff I have, but from what I've read it should be able to handle the NEMA17s I've got.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA