• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Really bad calibration results

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
Tuning and tweaking
3
10
866
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    Mike
    last edited by 10 May 2019, 21:54

    I've been resurrecting whatever remained of my old trusty Mini Kossel kit to a semi functional state and ran into some issues I'm having trouble to explain/deal with.

    Basically, this - 0_1557524898235_2019-05-10 23_44_54-Window.jpg

    The printer has a set of 3 under bed piezo sensors, so there shouldn't be any influence from the effector tilt. It's clear there's some underlying mechanical issue here, but I'm at a loss what it could be. I've tightened what could be tightened (pulleys, belts, screws, delta arms...), the bed itself is a cast aluminum plate flat to 0.1 mm. If anyone has any ideas what could be the cause of that, I'd be really grateful.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Phaedrux Moderator
      last edited by 11 May 2019, 00:56

      Have you gone through this?

      https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Calibrating_a_delta_printer

      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

      undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 May 2019, 01:06 Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        Mike @Phaedrux
        last edited by 11 May 2019, 01:06

        @phaedrux Yep, although 1 thing I haven't done was put springs/rubber between each pair of rods. Not sure if that could cause that much of an effect, but will do that nonetheless.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          Veti
          last edited by 11 May 2019, 04:40

          what factor calibration did you use?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            Veti
            last edited by 11 May 2019, 05:14

            it seems like a combination of
            1 position of one tower to high and
            radius to short

            http://boim.com/DeltaUtil/CalDoc/Calibration.html

            undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 May 2019, 11:59 Reply Quote 1
            • undefined
              Mike @Veti
              last edited by 11 May 2019, 11:59

              @veti Wow, that's a really nice reference page. I'm running a 6-factor auto calibration, so both endstop positions and delta radius should have been accounted for.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                Veti
                last edited by 11 May 2019, 12:02

                just making sure. you did save the settings from the auto calibration in your config.g?

                undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 May 2019, 12:20 Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  Mike @Veti
                  last edited by 11 May 2019, 12:20

                  @veti Yes, with config-override disabled for simplicity's sake.

                  The plot thickens... Once I allow the auto-calibration routine to adjust delta rod length with 9-point calibration, I get decent calibration, with 0.030 deviation and an almost perfectly flat bed on a G29 probe. A 8-point one nets a 0.4 deviation and some monstrous distortion.
                  I'd be pretty happy with the former if it didn't adjust my diagonal rod length all the way up to 267 mm. Which is really different from the real life measurement of 215 mm. That's getting confusing.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    Veti
                    last edited by 11 May 2019, 12:31

                    267 to 215 is nearly 25%

                    that could be the difference between using a 16 tooth pulley with 100 steps/mm and a 20 tooth pulley with 80 steps.

                    so which pulley are you using and what steps have you configured?

                    undefined 1 Reply Last reply 11 May 2019, 12:37 Reply Quote 2
                    • undefined
                      Mike @Veti
                      last edited by 11 May 2019, 12:37

                      @veti You're absolutely correct! No wonder that my homed height seemed higher than it should have been.
                      Thanks a lot! Case closed - I've configured steps per mm for 20-tooth pulleys while running 16-tooth ones.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      1 out of 10
                      • First post
                        1/10
                        Last post
                      Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA