Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Really bad calibration results

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Tuning and tweaking
    3
    10
    866
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Mikeundefined
      Mike
      last edited by

      I've been resurrecting whatever remained of my old trusty Mini Kossel kit to a semi functional state and ran into some issues I'm having trouble to explain/deal with.

      Basically, this - 0_1557524898235_2019-05-10 23_44_54-Window.jpg

      The printer has a set of 3 under bed piezo sensors, so there shouldn't be any influence from the effector tilt. It's clear there's some underlying mechanical issue here, but I'm at a loss what it could be. I've tightened what could be tightened (pulleys, belts, screws, delta arms...), the bed itself is a cast aluminum plate flat to 0.1 mm. If anyone has any ideas what could be the cause of that, I'd be really grateful.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Phaedruxundefined
        Phaedrux Moderator
        last edited by

        Have you gone through this?

        https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Calibrating_a_delta_printer

        Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

        Mikeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Mikeundefined
          Mike @Phaedrux
          last edited by

          @phaedrux Yep, although 1 thing I haven't done was put springs/rubber between each pair of rods. Not sure if that could cause that much of an effect, but will do that nonetheless.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Vetiundefined
            Veti
            last edited by

            what factor calibration did you use?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Vetiundefined
              Veti
              last edited by

              it seems like a combination of
              1 position of one tower to high and
              radius to short

              http://boim.com/DeltaUtil/CalDoc/Calibration.html

              Mikeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Mikeundefined
                Mike @Veti
                last edited by

                @veti Wow, that's a really nice reference page. I'm running a 6-factor auto calibration, so both endstop positions and delta radius should have been accounted for.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Vetiundefined
                  Veti
                  last edited by

                  just making sure. you did save the settings from the auto calibration in your config.g?

                  Mikeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Mikeundefined
                    Mike @Veti
                    last edited by

                    @veti Yes, with config-override disabled for simplicity's sake.

                    The plot thickens... Once I allow the auto-calibration routine to adjust delta rod length with 9-point calibration, I get decent calibration, with 0.030 deviation and an almost perfectly flat bed on a G29 probe. A 8-point one nets a 0.4 deviation and some monstrous distortion.
                    I'd be pretty happy with the former if it didn't adjust my diagonal rod length all the way up to 267 mm. Which is really different from the real life measurement of 215 mm. That's getting confusing.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Vetiundefined
                      Veti
                      last edited by

                      267 to 215 is nearly 25%

                      that could be the difference between using a 16 tooth pulley with 100 steps/mm and a 20 tooth pulley with 80 steps.

                      so which pulley are you using and what steps have you configured?

                      Mikeundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • Mikeundefined
                        Mike @Veti
                        last edited by

                        @veti You're absolutely correct! No wonder that my homed height seemed higher than it should have been.
                        Thanks a lot! Case closed - I've configured steps per mm for 20-tooth pulleys while running 16-tooth ones.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA