Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    New Toy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Off Topic
    15
    65
    6.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fmaundefined
      fma
      last edited by

      Thanks for the link!

      Frédéric

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • deckingmanundefined
        deckingman
        last edited by

        Well, my first bit of milling for about 48 years didn't turn out too bad.

        0_1557773660446_motorMounts.jpg

        6 (3 pairs) of new aluminium motor mounts (XYUVAW axes) to replace the plastic printed ones.

        Ian
        https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
        https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

        timcurtis67undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • DocTruckerundefined
          DocTrucker @deckingman
          last edited by

          @deckingman ha ha couldn't resist a pythonesk reply, you left the gate wide open!

          Cheers though, I shall bare that in mind. I've a few ideas maturing but need to gather thoughts a bit more.

          Running 3 P3Steel with Duet 2. Duet 3 on the shelf looking for a suitable machine. One first generation Duet in a Logo/Turtle style robot!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • timcurtis67undefined
            timcurtis67 @deckingman
            last edited by

            @deckingman said in New Toy:

            Well, my first bit of milling for about 48 years didn't turn out too bad.

            0_1557773660446_motorMounts.jpg

            6 (3 pairs) of new aluminium motor mounts (XYUVAW axes) to replace the plastic printed ones.

            Those parts are looking good Ian. Fly over here to the states and I'll get you a job working here in the machine shop where I work ☺ .

            deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • deckingmanundefined
              deckingman @timcurtis67
              last edited by

              @timcurtis67 Thanks Tim but sorry - wrong part of the world. Now if you were in Australia where my daughter lives, I might have been tempted ☺

              Ian
              https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
              https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Danalundefined
                Danal
                last edited by

                Fantastic,

                I have a Charter Oaks automation. Physically similar.

                Also, I made the same decision: DRO, not full CNC. It's been VERY productive...

                Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

                deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • deckingmanundefined
                  deckingman @Danal
                  last edited by

                  @danal Thanks. Coming from you, I'm reassured that my decision not to eventually turn it into a full CNC machine is justified.
                  The only thing that I'm finding is a bit of a PITA, is that I need to produce some sort of dimensioned drawings to work from, and as up until now I've designed everything exclusively using OpenScad, this isn't as easy as it could be. I need to look into that.

                  Ian
                  https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                  https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • fmaundefined
                    fma
                    last edited by

                    You can make cut in OpenSCAD, then export them as DXF, and load them in LibreCAD (very good software)...

                    Or switch to something much more powerfull, like Onshape/Fusion360 (not open).

                    Frédéric

                    deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • deckingmanundefined
                      deckingman @fma
                      last edited by

                      @fma Thanks, I'll give that a try. My current method is to import the OpenScad file into Freecad, then use an add on to make dimensioned drawings. It works reasonably well but I think what I need to do is just get to grips with some other Cad package and cut out the OpenScad step.

                      Ian
                      https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                      https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Former User?
                        A Former User
                        last edited by

                        If you don't mind the cloud part of Fusion360 its hard to beat the value to feature ratio of integrated CAD/CAM.

                        It is a bit tedious to export openscad -> freecad -> fusion just because there are no common formats between openscad and fusion though.

                        deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • deckingmanundefined
                          deckingman @A Former User
                          last edited by

                          @bearer Yes I've tried Fusion. It's a big learning curve for someone like me who has never used anything other than OpenScad. But then, so is FreeCad and probably all other CAD packages.
                          For the motor mounts, I just exported an image from OpenScad, printed it, looked though the OpenScad code to get the dimensions, then just scribbled them onto the printed image. Slightly better than the back of an envelope sketch, but not much........ ☺

                          Ian
                          https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                          https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • OBELIKSundefined
                            OBELIKS
                            last edited by

                            I think that when you learn the basics, Fusion workflow is much easier.
                            For those mounts, did you just use the same thickness as for plastic ones?

                            P3Steel Toolson mk2 - Duet 2 WiFi --> RatRig V-Core with Duet WiFi 1.03
                            Original Prusa i3 MK3S

                            deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • deckingmanundefined
                              deckingman @OBELIKS
                              last edited by deckingman

                              @obeliks said in New Toy:

                              I think that when you learn the basics, Fusion workflow is much easier.
                              For those mounts, did you just use the same thickness as for plastic ones?

                              Ref, Fusion - you could be right but I've got a lot going on at the moment so finding the time the time even to learn the basics is not easy.

                              I did use the same thickness aluminium for those motor mounts as the plastic version. They are 5mm thick and I realise that I could have got away with using say 3mm thick aluminium, but then I'd have had to change many dimensions to get the motor position in exactly the same place in all 3 planes. And I'd likely have needed to get all new bolts because the current ones would bottom out, both in the motor and in the extrusion Tee nuts using a thinner plate. (Edit - and that's 8 bolts per mount x 6 = 48 new bolts).

                              Ian
                              https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                              https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • OBELIKSundefined
                                OBELIKS
                                last edited by

                                I was actually guessing that you kept the same thickness. Because of all of the reasons that you mentioned, that is the simplest way.
                                And I am curious about the stiffness gains. OK, on your printer it is going to matter, but on smaller ones? I have a feeling that plastic could be good enough.

                                P3Steel Toolson mk2 - Duet 2 WiFi --> RatRig V-Core with Duet WiFi 1.03
                                Original Prusa i3 MK3S

                                deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • deckingmanundefined
                                  deckingman @OBELIKS
                                  last edited by

                                  @obeliks said in New Toy:

                                  I was actually guessing that you kept the same thickness. Because of all of the reasons that you mentioned, that is the simplest way.
                                  And I am curious about the stiffness gains. OK, on your printer it is going to matter, but on smaller ones? I have a feeling that plastic could be good enough.

                                  Oh plastic is fine as far as rigidity is concerned. Stiffness isn't an issue, nor is it the reason why I wanted to make metal mounts. Up until now, I've always tried to adhere the the RepRap philosophy and use as many printed parts as possible. Of course, that was partly driven by the fact that I had no means to make anything out of metal so I had no choice. All my carriages and idler pulley mounts are printed parts and I have to plans to change them, even though I could now do so.

                                  The reason why I wanted metal motor mounts was purely to do with heat. I've had problems in the past with very long prints (30 hrs+) and motors getting hot (as is normal) but the heat was causing the plastic mounts to soften slightly. Then the tension of the belts acting on the motor shaft caused the mounts to deform. I re-made the mounts using PET-G and also fitted fans and heat sinks to the motors which was 90% successful but not 100%. I'm still getting some deformation after very long prints - nothing like as bad but it's still an issue. Hence the need to use metal mounts - no other reason than that.

                                  Ian
                                  https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                                  https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A Former User?
                                    A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    I wonder if vibration dampening mounts could have gotten you the last 10%? I removed mine when I got alu motor mounts to help dissipate heat from motors.

                                    Moot point at this time though, but maybe someone else who stumble onto the thread will find it usefull.

                                    deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • deckingmanundefined
                                      deckingman @A Former User
                                      last edited by

                                      @bearer said in New Toy:

                                      I wonder if vibration dampening mounts could have gotten you the last 10%? I removed mine when I got alu motor mounts to help dissipate heat from motors.

                                      Moot point at this time though, but maybe someone else who stumble onto the thread will find it usefull.

                                      Maybe. But I hate the thought of using them on a printer. How can one guarantee positional accuracy if the motor itself can float about? I know they are quite popular but using them where positional accuracy is important, just goes against all my gut instincts.

                                      Ian
                                      https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                                      https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Former User?
                                        A Former User
                                        last edited by

                                        Pretty sure they would have less flex than toasty plastic, they're surprisingly rigid. Anyways, relics from an era before silky smooth interpolated microstepping from Trinamic

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • fmaundefined
                                          fma
                                          last edited by

                                          To block heat transfert, you could use a square sheet of cork between motor and mount (you can use a decent thickness). And use stainless steel screws. I'm pretty sure it's enough.

                                          Frédéric

                                          deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • deckingmanundefined
                                            deckingman @fma
                                            last edited by

                                            @fma Again, a bit too spongy for my liking.

                                            Also, metal mounts make it bit easier to earth the motors which I'm told is what we should all be doing to prevent static build up. Plastic mounts mean you have to run a separate cable.

                                            Ian
                                            https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                                            https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA