Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Delta experts: feedback appreciated

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    My Duet controlled machine
    8
    47
    2.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bartolomeusundefined
      bartolomeus @fcwilt
      last edited by

      @fcwilt said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

      @bartolomeus said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

      I think I am almost done with th ebasic frame layout.

      I just received an email about the Zesty Nimble V2. I did have a nimble before, but wasn't 100% satisfied.
      Now I am in doubt about the extruder setup:

      • Fying extruder
      • Nimble V2
      • Or 4th axis extruder?

      I have used Nimbles on all my printers and they have worked well for me.

      What problems did you have?

      It would be much simpler than a flying extruder.

      Frederick

      I never totally got rid of the wave pattern on the surfaces, even after I used the specified grease and also after they sent me a new worm gear.

      fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fcwiltundefined
        fcwilt
        last edited by

        Hi,

        Just another thought.

        Even if you don't go with a flying extruder you might want to keep the two additional "towers" and design some diagonal bracing between them and the rear tower.

        Keeping things square with no bracing can be a challenge.

        Frederick

        Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

        bartolomeusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • bartolomeusundefined
          bartolomeus @Danal
          last edited by

          @Danal Maybe in the future, I have a new 240mm bed ready to be installed. I'd like to have a 260mm one made out of tooling plate, but my funds have vanished....

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fcwiltundefined
            fcwilt @bartolomeus
            last edited by

            @bartolomeus said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

            @fcwilt said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

            @bartolomeus said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

            I think I am almost done with th ebasic frame layout.

            I just received an email about the Zesty Nimble V2. I did have a nimble before, but wasn't 100% satisfied.
            Now I am in doubt about the extruder setup:

            • Fying extruder
            • Nimble V2
            • Or 4th axis extruder?

            I have used Nimbles on all my printers and they have worked well for me.

            What problems did you have?

            It would be much simpler than a flying extruder.

            Frederick

            I never totally got rid of the wave pattern on the surfaces, even after I used the specified grease and also after they sent me a new worm gear.

            Hmm...

            I had problems with my deltas but that wasn't one of them. What was the supposed cause?

            Frederick

            Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

            bartolomeusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • bartolomeusundefined
              bartolomeus @fcwilt
              last edited by

              @fcwilt Yes, @Danal already mentioned the bracing. I'll build the frame first, and then decide if and how I will make some bracing.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • bartolomeusundefined
                bartolomeus @fcwilt
                last edited by

                @fcwilt said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                @bartolomeus said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                @fcwilt said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                @bartolomeus said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                I think I am almost done with th ebasic frame layout.

                I just received an email about the Zesty Nimble V2. I did have a nimble before, but wasn't 100% satisfied.
                Now I am in doubt about the extruder setup:

                • Fying extruder
                • Nimble V2
                • Or 4th axis extruder?

                I have used Nimbles on all my printers and they have worked well for me.

                What problems did you have?

                It would be much simpler than a flying extruder.

                Frederick

                I never totally got rid of the wave pattern on the surfaces, even after I used the specified grease and also after they sent me a new worm gear.

                Hmm...

                I had problems with my deltas but that wasn't one of them. What was the supposed cause?

                Frederick

                In the beginning many people had wave patterns on the surface of their prints with a Nimble. Most of these patterns disappeared by replacing the supplied lubricant with some silicone grease. The Nimbles are now supplied as standard with the silicone grease I believe. But somehow I couldn't get rid of it.

                fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • fcwiltundefined
                  fcwilt @bartolomeus
                  last edited by

                  @bartolomeus said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                  In the beginning many people had wave patterns on the surface of their prints with a Nimble. Most of these patterns disappeared by replacing the supplied lubricant with some silicone grease. The Nimbles are now supplied as standard with the silicone grease I believe. But somehow I couldn't get rid of it.

                  Thanks for that info.

                  I guess I got lucky.

                  Frederick

                  Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • bartolomeusundefined
                    bartolomeus
                    last edited by

                    Whilst waiting for parts to arrive, I modified the design to a standard 3 tower delta. As a result the footprint is alot smaller.

                    0d31dcbc-6063-4942-9f2d-ceaa665fe270.PNG

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • fcwiltundefined
                      fcwilt
                      last edited by

                      I wonder if you will be able to get the vertical extrusions square to the base and top.

                      Screws into the ends of the extrusions won't have much leverage.

                      Looking forward to your progress.

                      Thanks.

                      Frederick

                      Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                      bartolomeusundefined DeltaConundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • bartolomeusundefined
                        bartolomeus @fcwilt
                        last edited by bartolomeus

                        @fcwilt said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                        I wonder if you will be able to get the vertical extrusions square to the base and top.

                        Screws into the ends of the extrusions won't have much leverage.

                        Looking forward to your progress.

                        Thanks.

                        Frederick

                        Same here. I am relying on the supplier of the extrusions that they are precisely cut and the same length.

                        Otoh, the 3 tower frame is only 5 parts (2 plates and 3 towers). My (upgraded) Anycubic Delta frame was made of 18 parts (6 corners, 3 towers, 9 horizontals) and it printed pretty good. I am hoping the lower part count and precisely machined parts will pay off.

                        blt3dpundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • blt3dpundefined
                          blt3dp @bartolomeus
                          last edited by

                          @bartolomeus said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                          @fcwilt said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                          I wonder if you will be able to get the vertical extrusions square to the base and top.

                          Screws into the ends of the extrusions won't have much leverage.

                          Looking forward to your progress.

                          Thanks.

                          Frederick

                          Same here. I am relying on the supplier of the extrusions that they are precisely cut and the same length.

                          Otoh, the 3 tower frame is only 5 parts (2 plates and 3 towers). My (upgraded) Anycubic Delta frame was made of 18 parts (6 corners, 3 towers, 9 horizontals) and it printed pretty good. I am hoping the lower part count and precisely machined parts will pay off.

                          These are the reasons why I went with 4060 on mine, because it has a wider base and instead of the screws being all on one dimension, they're on two.

                          I also got mine milled square by a machine shop. It's incredibly accurate when done right.

                          My 3D Printing YouTube Channel
                          Better Living Through 3D Printing

                          Follow me on Instagram and Twitter
                          Instagram
                          Twitter

                          bartolomeusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • bartolomeusundefined
                            bartolomeus @blt3dp
                            last edited by

                            @blt3dp said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                            @bartolomeus said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                            @fcwilt said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                            I wonder if you will be able to get the vertical extrusions square to the base and top.

                            Screws into the ends of the extrusions won't have much leverage.

                            Looking forward to your progress.

                            Thanks.

                            Frederick

                            Same here. I am relying on the supplier of the extrusions that they are precisely cut and the same length.

                            Otoh, the 3 tower frame is only 5 parts (2 plates and 3 towers). My (upgraded) Anycubic Delta frame was made of 18 parts (6 corners, 3 towers, 9 horizontals) and it printed pretty good. I am hoping the lower part count and precisely machined parts will pay off.

                            These are the reasons why I went with 4060 on mine, because it has a wider base and instead of the screws being all on one dimension, they're on two.

                            I also got mine milled square by a machine shop. It's incredibly accurate when done right.

                            I did start out with a design based on 4060, but figured it would be overkill for a 240mm bed. I have already started on a 320-330mm bed version which will use 4060, however I am not sure if I will continue with the design or if I will build it.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DeltaConundefined
                              DeltaCon @fcwilt
                              last edited by

                              @fcwilt said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                              I wonder if you will be able to get the vertical extrusions square to the base and top.
                              Screws into the ends of the extrusions won't have much leverage.

                              What exactly do you mean with "won't have much levarage?"
                              Im am not an engineer, but my gut tells me that the direct metal to metal construction without corners will be much stiffer than anything that does use corners. The cuts of the extrusions will indeed have to be precise, but getting anything using corners precise and straight is also a PITA... Maybe the construction will gain stiffness if the verticals are rotated 90 degrees.

                              If you think trial and error is dangerous, try routine. That's even more so!

                              fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • fcwiltundefined
                                fcwilt @DeltaCon
                                last edited by fcwilt

                                @DeltaCon said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                                What exactly do you mean with "won't have much levarage?"

                                The extrusions are going to be tall in relation to their cross section.

                                Consider the diagram below. For a given force applied at the red arrow, to counteract that the required force applied at the green arrow on the right is going to be less than the required force applied at the green arrow on the left, because the lever arm is longer proving more leverage.

                                Frederick

                                Leverage Example.jpg

                                Printers: a small Utilmaker style, a small CoreXY and a E3D MS/TC setup. Various hotends. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DeltaConundefined
                                  DeltaCon
                                  last edited by

                                  Thanks, that much physics I do understand 😉
                                  In the left figure however, there is only one surface getting that force applied and possibly giving room for error. In the right fugure, if you use corner brackets, or those ugly cube-shaped things(that are often unsquare by default) you aply the force to more contact surfaces so giving more room for error. In my opinion it is not about the length of the arms, but about the stiffness of the joint. Less is more in this case.

                                  If you think trial and error is dangerous, try routine. That's even more so!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • bartolomeusundefined
                                    bartolomeus
                                    last edited by

                                    Fun has started:

                                    Screenshot_20191108_154942.jpg

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Munce31undefined
                                      Munce31
                                      last edited by

                                      This delta looks awesome!

                                      Is there any chance you'll be making the design available for others to create their own?

                                      bartolomeusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • bartolomeusundefined
                                        bartolomeus @Munce31
                                        last edited by bartolomeus

                                        @Munce31 said in Delta experts: feedback appreciated:

                                        This delta looks awesome!

                                        Is there any chance you'll be making the design available for others to create their own?

                                        Thanks!
                                        I am quite happy myself. Just finished building and started using the printer. With a bowden for now, waiting for the last parts to arrive to install the 4th axis. Calibrated to 0.01 deviation, which seems ok to me. Tbh I haven't even aligned the rails yet. Also the idler mounts need a slight adjustment. I might be able to move the idler mounts up and still clear the effector. This way it will be easier to tighten the belts, and also shorten the belts.

                                        Edit: oh, and yes I might make the designs publicly available. Will take some time though untill I have everything sorted out.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • bartolomeusundefined
                                          bartolomeus
                                          last edited by

                                          I am about to receive the last parts to setup the 4th axis.
                                          Now I have a question about firmware configuration: I want the extruder output to keep the same distance from the hotend as when all axis are homed (the endstop of the 4th tower will be mounted lower than xyz endstops). How should I calculate the 4th axis 'rod length?

                                          M665 L288:288:288:?? R140 H340 B117.5

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DeltaConundefined
                                            DeltaCon
                                            last edited by

                                            @bartolomeus: I never thought a 4th axis would be interesting because I thought, probably a false assumption, that the shorter bowden would be stressed during moves. If there is a possibility to keep the correct distance from hotend to extruder given the position of the extruder, that makes a significant difference! So I am curious about an answer to your question 😉

                                            Also: Do you have some newer pictures of the machine in use?

                                            If you think trial and error is dangerous, try routine. That's even more so!

                                            bartolomeusundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA