Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    An idea for a funding model for Duet firmware - discuss.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Off Topic
    11
    24
    1.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • zaptaundefined
      zapta @A Former User
      last edited by

      @arnold_r_clark said in An idea for a funding model for Duet firmware - discuss.:

      A key word search for Duet products on Aliexpress just threw up 14 pages

      "I cherry picked and found a pattern" 😉

      Try search Aliexpress for 3d printer controller board and check the ratio between western and Chinese designs.

      That's also the vibe I got in Voron circles, the hot boards are Chinese (SKR, Spider, Octopus, etc).

      They are catching up, fast, as the Japanese and the South Korean did.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • hackinistratorundefined
        hackinistrator
        last edited by

        I think , at some point open source becomes pointless .
        And , i think RRF already reached that stage .

        Lets take marlin for example (i didn't use RRF at its early stages) , i remember the days when i tweaked the code to add sensors / change thermistor tables and other settings and felt like a superman .

        Or the days when some of us tweaked android phones with custom firmware builds .

        It was fun and all , but today at this stage , i never touched RRF source code and never tweaked it .
        Same for my android phone , last time i had a phone with an open bootloader was about 10 years ago .

        After years of development , the software grows so big , complicated and feature packed that it becomes a real pita / needless to touch it .
        So whats the point of the software to be open source at this stage ?
        its only relevant to about 0.001% of total userbase , probably less.

        jens55undefined oliofundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • jens55undefined
          jens55 @hackinistrator
          last edited by

          @hackinistrator said in An idea for a funding model for Duet firmware - discuss.:

          So whats the point of the software to be open source at this stage ?
          its only relevant to about 0.001% of total userbase , probably less.

          For one, what if Covid took out @dc42 ?? Wouldn't you at least want somebody to take over maintaining the code?
          I don't touch the base code either but it gives me great comfort knowing that at any point I 'could' tweak it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • oliofundefined
            oliof @hackinistrator
            last edited by

            @hackinistrator I might be that .001%, but I like to read code and make sure I can do changes if I need to (I did implement a kinematics class but never submitted it upstream because I feel it's incomplete and no usable machine design exists to use it). But I also read documentation and sometimes update small things on the wiki, so I may be an outlier.

            <>RatRig V-Minion Fly Super5Pro RRF<> V-Core 3.1 IDEX k*****r <> RatRig V-Minion SKR 2 Marlin<>

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA