Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool

o_lampe

@deckingman I think there is no need to use filament length and diameter. Prusa Slicer tells us how much the part will weight.
Just calculate the volume of the filament on the spool ( hollow cylinder: outer diameter, inner diameter, spool-width).
Multiplying that by the right fill-grade factor and density would give you the real weight left on the spool.

o_lampe

@OwenD said in Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool:

(testicular filament runout alarm generator)
All it requires is a large capacitor

I have a sound sleep, it would take a car battery to wake me up

deckingman

@o_lampe said in Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool:

@deckingman I think there is no need to use filament length and diameter. Prusa Slicer tells us how much the part will weight.
Just calculate the volume of the filament on the spool ( hollow cylinder: outer diameter, inner diameter, spool-width).
Multiplying that by the right fill-grade factor and density would give you the real weight left on the spool.

That's another way of doing it but calculating the "fill grade factor" could be tricky. Also, you'd need to know the weight of an empty reel which is also tricky if you don't happen to have any scales to weigh one. You'd also need to look up the density of the filament. Rulers I have, scales I don't, which is why I wanted to use another method.

dc42

@deckingman said in Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool:

Also, you'd need to know the weight of an empty reel which is also tricky if you don't happen to have any scales to weigh one.

If you don't have an empty spool then you could weigh the full spool when you open it and subtract the declared weight of filament.

deckingman

@dc42 said in Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool:

@deckingman said in Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool:

Also, you'd need to know the weight of an empty reel which is also tricky if you don't happen to have any scales to weigh one.

If you don't have an empty spool then you could weigh the full spool when you open it and subtract the declared weight of filament.

As above - rulers (and empty spools) I have - scales I do not currently have.

Phaedrux

@deckingman The $8 Amazon Basics kitchen scale I ordered years ago has been one of the more useful tools I've gotten.

deckingman

@Phaedrux That's fascinating information I'm sure.

I'm starting to doubt my sanity but I'm pretty sure it's the rest of the world that's crazy.

I put out a post detailing a method I use to determine how much filament is left on a reel using nothing but a ruler. I state that this method works reliably and well for me. I post a link to a YouTube video I made which in turn links to spreadsheet that contains the necessary calculations for anyone who might be interested.

Ignoring all that, someone suggests that I should weigh the filament.

Then, still ignoring the fact that I have a relaliable method using a ruler, someone else suggests how I could determine the weight of an empty reel using scales.

Now, still ignoring the fact that I use a ruler, I have a suggestion as to where I could buy some suitable scales in order to make a measurement that I don't need.

Phaedrux

@deckingman Just sharing Ian. No need to take it personally.

o_lampe

@dc42 said in Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool:

@deckingman said in Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool:

Also, you'd need to know the weight of an empty reel which is also tricky if you don't happen to have any scales to weigh one.

If you don't have an empty spool then you could weigh the full spool when you open it and subtract the declared weight of filament.

That's also a good way to figure out a value for (fill-rate + density). The initial filament volume on the spool is the starting point.
We don't need to know the real density or the real fill-rate, only the sum of it.
From there it's relative.

deckingman

@Phaedrux said in Macro to calculate remaining filament on a spool:

@deckingman Just sharing Ian. No need to take it personally.

No offence taken - I'm much too long in the tooth for that. Just pointing out the ridiculousness of the situation. It's like giving someone directions of how to get from A to B and then someone else saying one could get to B by starting at C instead of A. Then more people suggesting ways to get to C. While it may all be factually correct, it's rather pointless is one is already at A.