Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Input Shaping evaluation help needed

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    5
    10
    474
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • gringoundefined
      gringo
      last edited by

      Hey there,
      Can someone explain to me which input shaper I should use and how I can get rid of the frequencies below 30Hz.

      Input Shaper.JPG
      InputShaper ZVDDD.JPG

      Or do I have a mechanical problem?

      Thanks all

      droftartsundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • droftartsundefined
        droftarts administrators @gringo
        last edited by

        @gringo Some context would be useful. I'm guessing this is a delta machine? Looks like ZVDDD is doing a good job of removing a major resonant frequency across all the axes. Probably just the natural harmonic of your machine, as it's seen on all axes at a specific frequency, so not a mechanical problem. But I'm not an expert on IS!

        Ian

        Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • gringoundefined
          gringo
          last edited by

          My Printer is a Core XY

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • gringoundefined
            gringo
            last edited by

            I have another question.
            Where can I adjust speeds and acceleration for Input Shaping?
            Imthink different speeds and accelerations needs different Input Shaper frequencies.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators @gringo
              last edited by

              @gringo the frequencies below 30Hz may be artefacts from the movement you are using when you capture the data. Try capturing data after the movement has stopped, by unchecking the box that says capture data over the whole move.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              gringoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • gringoundefined
                gringo @dc42
                last edited by

                @dc42

                thanks, I will try it and post the results.

                But which speeds and accelerations are used for Input Shaping?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • gringoundefined
                  gringo
                  last edited by

                  Here are the next measurements
                  Rocord Motion Profile.JPG MZV@85Hz.JPG ZVD@85Hz.JPG ZVDD@85Hz.JPG ZVDDD@85Hz.JPG EI2@85Hz.JPG EI3@85Hz.JPG

                  What now? I don't know what to set.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • gringoundefined
                    gringo
                    last edited by

                    Here is a photo from a actual print.
                    Tested different Shaper, started with ei2@56Hz --> zvddd@57Hz --> zvddd@80Hz.

                    I can´t see any difference.

                    IMG_4197.jpg

                    ctilley79undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ctilley79undefined
                      ctilley79 @gringo
                      last edited by

                      @gringo those are short segments where input shaping is not being applied. 3.5 RC1 attempted to fix that but I’ve found that there are still moves where input shaping is ignored. My understanding is RRF’s input shaping may receive another overhaul after 3.5 is released.

                      For that reason I installed klipper on my duet boards and can confirm klipper does not have the same limitations. I look forward to coming back to RRF because overall, I do love RRF much better and the hardware is just much higher quality. My goal however is to print faster without the reduction in quality, and right now klipper provides that with exceptional results.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • gringoundefined
                        gringo
                        last edited by

                        Thank you for the execution,

                        I have two other printers with Duet Boards where I print slower and with much less acceleration.

                        I have not tested Klipper yet, but I am planning to build the next printer and run it with Klipper to have a comparison.

                        I printed the VZ Cupe at 100mm/s with 5K ACC of the outer perimeter.
                        Reducing the acceleration of the outer perimeter to 2K at 100mm/s has brought significant improvement.

                        In my opinion, I should also be able to select the speed and acceleration in the selection window for Input Shaper as the frequencies change at different speeds and accelerations.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA