Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    BL(3D) touch woes... Any ideas?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    8
    16
    1.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Vetiundefined
      Veti
      last edited by

      i bought and tested one of those clones and found them to be far to inaccurate. (+/- 0.05mm)

      what i did in the end is build a BFPTouch from thingiverse. It uses an optical endstop and is far more accurate. Marlins M48 gave me a SD of 0.002. It is not susceptible to heating being on compared to the bltouch.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Mangy_Dogundefined
        Mangy_Dog
        last edited by

        Thanks for the trouble shoot... But I think I have all points covered. It did give me th link to buy genuine a BL touch, so ordered one...

        As for the hump... Yeah maybe the gantry is sagging 😕 not sure what to do about it. I honestly thought 2 10mm hardened steel with spaced out bearings would stop any sag like that.... Any ideas there?

        T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T3P3Tonyundefined
          T3P3Tony administrators @Mangy_Dog
          last edited by

          @mangy_dog well, that's also what the mesh bed compensation is there to some extent. Once you have the BL touch working repeatability then try the printer with the compensation.

          www.duet3d.com

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Phaedruxundefined
            Phaedrux Moderator
            last edited by

            Have you tried printing a first layer calibration print to see if the bulge is actually there or not?

            0_1542133661353_bedlevel_nozzle_0.4_200x200-0.3-0.8.stl

            If you print that scaled to your bed size first without compensation active, and then again with it on you should be able to tell if the heightmap is correct or not.

            Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • botundefined
              bot
              last edited by

              Approximately how much does the gantry weigh? Including the bearings, the carriage, hotend, etc. excluding the rails?

              *not actually a robot

              Mangy_Dogundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Mangy_Dogundefined
                Mangy_Dog @bot
                last edited by Mangy_Dog

                @bot I don't know, but It has 2 mini turbo fans, 4030 I think... A chimera with volcano blocks. A small but not pancake stepper for direct drive extrusion, a titan like setup (custom design) and the BL touch. 4 ln10uu ball bearings and a slightly wide design thanks to the fans layout. All printed in cf petg.

                Honestly wouldn't have thought that be enough to make the gantry sag.

                alt text

                The span is 500mm..... Maybe that is just enough to make this sag.

                Oh and the sag is real. Did a paper grip test and the hot end pinched the paper very tightly in that jumped area

                Phaedruxundefined botundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Phaedruxundefined
                  Phaedrux Moderator @Mangy_Dog
                  last edited by

                  @mangy_dog Sometimes the sag can also be a result of the rods getting bent during a head crash.

                  Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • botundefined
                    bot @Mangy_Dog
                    last edited by bot

                    @mangy_dog I did some quick and dirty FEA in fusion 360, and I was able to elicit 100 microns of displacement with 2 kg on one pair of rails. Steel rails with ABS plastic mounts, over a ~500 mm span

                    0_1542215889798_FEA10mmrails.jpg

                    Stack two of these on top of each other, and I could understand the displacement you're seeing in reality.

                    *not actually a robot

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Phaedruxundefined
                      Phaedrux Moderator
                      last edited by

                      Have you done a test print with mesh compensation active? It should have no problem taking care of the distortion.

                      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Kenny66undefined
                        Kenny66
                        last edited by Kenny66

                        From the mesh image it looks like it's bowing UP not down.
                        What do you have on top of the cast aluminum bed?
                        My guess is your bed sheet is flexed either from the binder clips or from natural flex when it's heated and being held at the corners.

                        Truth be told though I wouldn't worry about it. The bed mesh will compensate for that and your mean error is < 0.1mm. I wish mine was that close. 🙂

                        I am also having the same issue that the probe doesn't always deploy when doing a G30 S-1. Mine does complete a bed mesh with no issues though.

                        phantomixundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • phantomixundefined
                          phantomix @Kenny66
                          last edited by phantomix

                          @kenny66 said in BL(3D) touch woes... Any ideas?:

                          From the mesh image it looks like it's bowing UP not down.

                          Exactly. When the X axis bows down, the probe will trigger earlier which results in an elevated point
                          I would have expected a more "cylindrical" shape of the probing result, though.

                          Edit: As it seems to be a CoreXY, there would be bowing on the X and on the Y axis, which explains the result.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Kenny66undefined
                            Kenny66
                            last edited by

                            Could always take the bed sheet off and probe the aluminum directly and see what you get.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Mangy_Dogundefined
                              Mangy_Dog
                              last edited by

                              Hi all sorry for not replying sooner, the probing is direct on the 6mm thick cast aluminium. The machine is still in early testing and as such the beds not even been heated up... I've not even fitted the heat matt yet 😛

                              Yeah its core xy, and the rods are alined vertically, with a 6cm space and 6cm separation of 4 bearings, I has thought that the spread load would negate downward stress.

                              Anyway, I'm now designing a rail xy that I will fit, replacing the rods... The y will be a 12mm rail bolted to 2020 aluminium. If that ends up sagging I'll cry.... A lot...

                              Using mesh compensation might correct the hump to some degree, but I would still know it's off. And it would never be perfect...

                              My print carriage I'm certain is under 2kg, heck I think it's under 1... It didn't feel as heavy as a bag of sugar...

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA