Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. KP0005
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 19
    • Posts 118
    • Best 7
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    KP0005

    @KP0005

    15
    Reputation
    4
    Profile views
    118
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online

    KP0005 Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by KP0005

    • Macro for PrusaSlicer : Automatically Probe Only Print Area

      I made a macro that alters your bed grid to the area the printer is actually printing on.

      Inspired by https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/15302/cura-script-to-automatically-probe-only-printed-area

      Features:

      • makes sure the requested grid fits your probeable area (not neccesarily the same as the printable area)
      • makes sure the grid is at least 3x3 points
      • the grid is centered on the print and expanded to fit a whole number of constant size squares
      • has two defined probe spacings - fine for small prints, coarse for large prints, so that you don't take ages to probe the entire bed

      Works with prusaslicer and perhaps others

      How to use:

      • put the script into your /sys folder
      • open it and edit the constants for your machine (read the comments)
      • in PrusaSlicer, go to Printer settings / Custom G-code and replace G29 in your Start G-code with
      M98 P"localised_mesh_bed.g" A[first_layer_print_min_0] B[first_layer_print_max_0] C[first_layer_print_min_1] D[first_layer_print_max_1] ; only probe the part of the bed that you're printing on
      
      • add a command to reset the grid back to normal to your End G-code
      M557 X24:228 Y6:210 S51 ; reset bed grid
      
      • Those numbers are for my machine, please replace with your own.

      localised_mesh_bed.g

      posted in Gcode meta commands
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: 3.5.0 RC3 cannot connect to DWC

      @dc42 I confirm that the new binary does fix the issue for me, thank you!

      posted in Beta Firmware
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • Feature request: 12864 display QOL improvements
      • some way to display strings that are too long for the entire display width. It could be linebreaks, scrolling text...
      • string slicing (some way to display a job file name without the 0:/gcodes/)
      • time remaining based on slicer. It's already exposed in the object model, but the expressipn to convert [number of seconds] to HH:MM:SS seems to be too long for the menu file system.
      posted in Firmware wishlist
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • A set of Maestro menu files

      Hello,
      I've been working on a set of menu files for my printer and now that I have some time I decided to share them.
      My files began as a modification of the menu created by @mudcruzr, but some of the files got so different in the end that I decided not to do a pull request (in particular, I created my own icons and removed some options from the main screen that I felt weren't used often enough to warrant beng on the main screen)

      The printer this was designed for is a cartesian "bedslinger" with a single extruder, a heated bed and an inductive bed probe (modified Prusa)

      Anyway, here's the link, enjoy!
      https://github.com/Sidic101/Duet-Maestro-12864-Menu-Files

      posted in Example setups and prints
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: help to print side holes round, but not elliptic

      Here's what I use: https://github.com/gregsaun/maker_cheatsheet/blob/master/3d_printing/techniques.md

      posted in Tuning and tweaking
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      @oliof
      Sliced for Duet: ringing_tower_0.4n_0.2mm_PLA_MK3.9_9m.gcode
      Sliced for Klipper: ringing_tower_0.4n_0.2mm_PLA_MK3.9_7m.gcode

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RRF Feature request: option for coarser "alter" on 12864

      The "alter" feature in the 12864 display menu system, while giving very fine control over the altered value, starts to feel slow and too fine when trying to control things like long axes.
      I suggest this could be solved by allowing for negative values of the D parameter. This would make the "alter" element ignore a given number of least significant digits.

      For example:
      alter D-1 N510 would control the X axis in steps of 10, ignoring the least significant digit
      alter D-2 N510 would control the X axis in steps of 100, ignoring the two least significant digits
      etc

      posted in Firmware wishlist
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005

    Latest posts made by KP0005

    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      The different banding in the top and bottom half of each tower segment is (I think) because the move direction flips midway.

      That's all I got so far. @oliof

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      And now: Klipper MZV:
      IMG_20240207_224659.jpg
      That's the harshest lighting I could manage. It's just perfect somehow.

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      MZV, no besh bed:
      IMG_20240207_224516.jpg

      EI3, no mesh bed: it made shorter segments worse than baseline
      IMG_20240207_224538.jpg

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      All shapers except EI3. Reduced speed, so the bands are closer together. 38 Hz, 0.1 dampening factor.IMG_20240207_224035.jpg

      Interestingly, the results do differ for small segments:
      IMG_20240207_224225.jpg

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      Photos! They're here!

      MZV, frequency sweep from 36 to 56 Hz, jerk 300.IMG_20240207_223839.jpg

      I did in the end notice some weird corner artifacts, I didn't pay much attention to this area before.
      IMG_20240207_223952.jpg

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      Another thing I forgot to mention. Disabling pressure advance also didn't help.

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      @oliof I know the Duet version has high jerk and mesh bed enabled. I have disabled those manually while printing. Haven't seen a improvement.

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      (I am trying to tune the printer to use Prusa MK3.9 profiles, since it shares most of the mechanics with it. My printer is a heavily modified MK2 with a homebrew version of the Bondtech MK3 extruder)

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      @oliof
      Sliced for Duet: ringing_tower_0.4n_0.2mm_PLA_MK3.9_9m.gcode
      Sliced for Klipper: ringing_tower_0.4n_0.2mm_PLA_MK3.9_7m.gcode

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005
    • RE: (mis)adventures in Input Shaping

      @oliof
      RRF 3.5 RC3+ (last week, DC42's hotfix of the network issues from here https://forum.duet3d.com/post/332835)

      I have tried MZV at both 40 and 50 Hz in RRF to basically no improvement over no shaping.

      I haven't encountered layer shifting or blobbing in RRF, but some of the shapers caused sharp corners to print much worse. No such issue with Klipper.

      posted in General Discussion
      KP0005undefined
      KP0005