Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Heated bed thickness

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Duet Hardware and wiring
    6
    19
    1.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • gtj0undefined
      gtj0
      last edited by

      That's a pretty large surface area to heat to 180 and keep it uniform. 🙂

      As long as the plate can expand/contract freely in X and Y and it was brought up to temp gradually, I'd think it'd be OK from a surface plane point of view. You might want to insulate the underside to keep the heat in. I have a 500x500x6 plate and the insulation helped a lot.

      jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jay_s_ukundefined
        jay_s_uk @gtj0
        last edited by

        @gtj0 I'll be using a 2000w silicone heater so I should have no problems getting there. It'll also Be mounted on 3 balls so won't actually be constrained, more floating

        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

        fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • fcwiltundefined
          fcwilt @jay_s_uk
          last edited by

          @jay_s_uk said in Heated bed thickness:

          @gtj0 It'll also Be mounted on 3 balls so won't actually be constrained, more floating

          That's basically what I did.

          The ball studs were on the parts that attached to the lead screws.

          On the underside of the bed frame were parts with grooves that matched the balls and constrained the frame from moving in X/Y but allowed for expansion in X/Y.

          It works very well.

          Frederick

          Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

          jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jay_s_ukundefined
            jay_s_uk @fcwilt
            last edited by

            @fcwilt did you mount the balls to the underside of the bed then?

            Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

            fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • fcwiltundefined
              fcwilt @jay_s_uk
              last edited by

              @jay_s_uk said in Heated bed thickness:

              @fcwilt did you mount the balls to the underside of the bed then?

              No they are mounted, via a "L shaped part I designed, to the carriages on the linear rails.

              Frederick

              Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

              jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jay_s_ukundefined
                jay_s_uk @fcwilt
                last edited by

                @fcwilt What size and thickness is your bed?

                Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DaBitundefined
                  DaBit
                  last edited by DaBit

                  If you use cast tooling plate it won't bend as long as it can expand freely, and as a bonus it is quite flat on at least one side. If you use rolled plate it will twist or bend slightly over time.

                  I am using a 300x300x10mm aluminium plate with 600W Keenovo silicone heater. Absolutely no issue reaching and maintaining 150C, never tried 180C but that should be no issue; the heater is not operating near full power at 150C. Your surface is 2.8x as large, with 2kW the power density is higher.

                  My plate is mounted on a carrier structure with 3 PTFE spacers and stainless screws. One is fixed, one spacer moves in a slot (and thus constrained to a single axis), one can move freely in the XY plane but not in Z. This allows expansion but constrains free movement.
                  A couple of images can be found in this forum topic. Dutch, unfortunately.
                  Although I must say that the kinematic mount using a couple of balls is quite charming too.

                  PTFE tends to creep over time when under a constant load. I do not expect many issues with that though, and I did not yet want to spend some of my limited supply of PEEK on those spacers.

                  fcwiltundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • fcwiltundefined
                    fcwilt @jay_s_uk
                    last edited by

                    @jay_s_uk said in Heated bed thickness:

                    @fcwilt What size and thickness is your bed?

                    Appx 350 x 250 x 7.

                    Frederick

                    Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                    Vetiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • fcwiltundefined
                      fcwilt @DaBit
                      last edited by

                      @DaBit said in Heated bed thickness:

                      Although I must say that the kinematic mount using a couple of balls is quite charming too.

                      My attempt came about as I was experimenting with auto bed leveling and needed something that would not only allow for thermal expansion but also out-of-level conditions.

                      Frederick

                      Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jay_s_ukundefined
                        jay_s_uk
                        last edited by

                        I'm going for cast aluminium tool plate. I can go for 10mm, 12mm, 12.7mm or 15mm

                        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DaBitundefined
                          DaBit
                          last edited by

                          10mm should do.

                          According to a quick&dirty simulation: when constrained at the 4 corners the plate will sag 0,048mm in the middle due to gravity, taking in account the reduced E-modulus due to the aluminium being heated to 180C.

                          In reality this will be slightly more since the corners are not fully constrained.

                          jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Vetiundefined
                            Veti @fcwilt
                            last edited by

                            @jay_s_uk

                            check out these guys
                            https://clever3d.de/epages/7a4290fc-7c7f-46cc-9b99-eadef22228e2.sf/de_DE/?ObjectPath=/Shops/7a4290fc-7c7f-46cc-9b99-eadef22228e2/Products/c3d-DDP-PEI-natur

                            currently their max size on offer is 450x450 but they say they can do custom sizes upon request, as each is individually made.
                            it is machined and pei covered.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jay_s_ukundefined
                              jay_s_uk @DaBit
                              last edited by

                              @DaBit Thanks for that. I probably won't be going anywhere near that high but I wanted to ensure I had the capability if required.

                              @Veti I have a mate who will machine it for me. Just need to sort out what I'm going to print on.

                              Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                              deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • deckingmanundefined
                                deckingman @jay_s_uk
                                last edited by

                                @jay_s_uk For info, I use 10mm on my 400x400 bed and if I was doing it again, I'd probably settle for 8mm to improve the warm up time. It takes time for the heat to get transferred from the bottom surface where the heater is, through to the top surface where you want to print, so the thicker the plate, the longer that time. Having said that, if I was going for 500mm x 500mm as you are, I'd probably choose 10mm thick. IMO, there is nothing to gain by going thicker than that.

                                From your user name I'd guess that you are in the UK. If so, this is a good source https://www.aluminiumwarehouse.co.uk/aluminium-plate-cut-to-order. Go for the "Ecocast" which is quote "a fine milled and high precision continuous cast aluminium tooling plate."

                                It's also worth giving some thought as to where you fit the temperature sensor. With thick plate, the junction between the heater and the bottom of the plate is not the best place. I drilled a 3mm hole in the edge of the plate as deep as I could and as close to the top surface as possible without breaking through.

                                HTH

                                Ian
                                https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                                https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DaBitundefined
                                  DaBit
                                  last edited by

                                  One caveat with the sensor close to the top: during warmup there is 10's of degrees temperature differential between the silicone heater core temperature and the top of the build plate. If you really intend to go to 150-180C plate temperature you might end up in a situation where the top is not yet at the intended temperature, but the silicone heater is hot enough to break down the adhesive backing.

                                  I have drilled the hole for an extra sensor, but I am still using the sensor in the mat itself for this reason after a friend of mine kept having issues with silicone heaters coming loose. I just allow a couple of minutes extra heat soak time. After all the heat must soak through the glass plate also. Usually turning on the bed heater before exporting STL/slicing/preparing gives plenty of time for the bed to stabilise.

                                  The best solution would be to use two sensors, the one in the mat to put a cap on the maximum temperature there, and another close to the top of the build plate for control. Not sure how to do this with Duet though, maybe with some creative use of themostatic fan control.

                                  deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • deckingmanundefined
                                    deckingman @DaBit
                                    last edited by

                                    @DaBit I hadn't considered the effect of running the bed at 150 to 180 deg C on the silicone heater adhesive. I use semi rigid insulation under the heater, between the bed frame and the aluminium plate as a sort of sandwich. So if the adhesive gave way, the heater pad would remain intact, but I have no idea if that insulation would withstand temperatures.as high as 150 to 180 deg C.

                                    But actually, at the start of warm up, the temperature differential between the pad/aluminium junction and the top of the thick plate can be a lot more than 10 degrees. Obviously it depends on the power of the heater and the thickness of the plate. When I first put my bed together, with a thermistor at that junction, I found that the temperature would rise very rapidly to the set point of (say) 60 deg C at which point the heater would cut out until the temperature dropped a degree or so, then cut back in. But of course, the top of the plate would remain relatively cool. This on off cycle would continue for a long while which meant that it took an awfully long time before the upper surface got anywhere close to the desired temperature. IIRC, it was about 15 minutes to get to 60 deg C but after moving the thermistor, that time dropped to less than 5 minutes.

                                    So as I said, the positioning of the temperature sensor needs to be given careful consideration.

                                    Ian
                                    https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                                    https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Vetiundefined
                                      Veti
                                      last edited by

                                      e3d develop special beds to operate at that temperature.

                                      https://e3d-online.com/high-temperature-heated-beds

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DaBitundefined
                                        DaBit
                                        last edited by

                                        @deckingman: the adhesive handles 200-220C just fine, only not much more if you want it to last. And if you turn on your 2kW heater with the temperature sensor on top of the plate the adhesive will become hotter than that before the surface reaches 180C.

                                        I agree that a sensor close to the top and away from the edge of the hotplate is best for sensing/controlling the bed temperature, and I agree that having the sensor at the heater location slows down reaching final temperature a lot. But I would still like to have a cap on heater core temperature, which is best sensed with the thermistor integrated by Keenovo. I have a hard time implementing these kind of things exactly as I want them with Duet hardware though. A lua interpreter, softPLC, conditional G-code that runs on a timer trigger, whatever would be extremely welcome.

                                        Regarding insulation: I am using a ceramic mat that is used to rebuild two-stroke silencers between the hotplate/silicone mat and the support structure, available at your nearest moped dealer. Insulation properties are decent but not great. With the bed at 110C the support structure directly under the hotplate goes up to 50 degrees or so over a timespan of a few hours, I can live with that. At least that stuff won't decompose or burn when something goes wrong. Cork is another option that works well up to 200C and which can handle short-term temperatures up to 350C.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA