Bench Testing Mixing Extruder with Pronterface
-
-
@Phaedrux - it does seem there are not tools. Hmm - I used the Web RRF Config Tool - I guess I'll go back and run that again. Thanks - just finding the config.g file was super helpful. I was confused why my config file was so hard to decipher.
-
@deckingman Thanks for pointing me in the right dirrection - much appreciated.
-
@ractorIII No worries. Come back if you need more help.
-
@deckingman - with that note - trouble - I was expecting to be able to designate a tool that utilized 5 extruders with a simple text command M563 P0 D0:1:2:3:4 with printrun it bounces back that there is an error with the drive numbers. Also - I have not been able to issue simple gcode commands via Duet Web Control - though I am able to connect...
-
What does the error say?
What happens when you try to send commands in the DWC console?
-
@Phaedrux Nothing happens when I attempt to send gcode through the Duet Web Interface - though the log state that I am connected, the log does not indicate that any code was sent. Another issue that I am having with DWC is that if I attempt to upload the zipped reprap config file I get an AJAX error and it disconnects. If I remember right - I was having this issue before and had to disconnect my power supply from the board and run it strictly of usb to get the upload to work - very inconvenient. I guess I'll open my housing and pull the micro SD out to update reprap config files.
To the issue at hand, which is getting a tool designated for bench testing my extruder setup. The following is how print run responds when issued:
SENDING:M563 P0 D0:1:2:3:4
Error: Tool creation: bad drive number
[ERROR] Error: Tool creation: bad drive numberI'm using a duet wifi with x5 expansion - I have a total of 7 extruder steppers and for this tool I am trying to use the 2 that are on the Duet Wifi and the first 3 that are on the x5 expansion.
-
Sounds like you might have a mismatched DWC version? What versions are you running?
-
@Phaedrux - you may be right - this is what is listed on DWC. Should the Web Interface Version be HTML: 3.0? I'm starting to get very confused...
Firmware Name: RepRapFirmware for Duet 2 WiFi/Ethernet
Firmware Version: 3.0 (2020-01-03b3)
Web Interface Version: HTML: 1.11 -
-
@Phaedrux - not able to upload file with DWC - followed instructions here:
to unzip DuetWebControl-SD.zip onto SD card after deleting old file contents
issue remains - AJAX error when uploading files via DWC
-
Just to confirm, you've wiped out the /www folder and replaced it with the contents of the zip file and the DWC version now shows as 2.0.7?
What browser are you using?
-
@Phaedrux -scratch that - installed and seems to be in sync now.
still trouble defining tool head - same bounce back from DWC on issuing M563 P0 D0:1:2:3:4
'tool creation:bad drive number
-
@ractorIII said in Bench Testing Mixing Extruder with Pronterface:
M584 X0 Y2 Z1 E3:4:5:6:7:8 ; set drive mapping
How do you have your motors connected? The drive mappings don't match what you're trying to use for tool drives.
https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M584_Set_drive_mapping
https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Gcode#Section_M563_Define_or_remove_a_tool
-
; Configuration file for Duet WiFi (firmware version 2.03)
; executed by the firmware on start-up
;
; generated by RepRapFirmware Configuration Tool v2.1.8 on Sat Feb 01 2020 21:20:25 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time); General preferences
G90 ; send absolute coordinates...
M83 ; ...but relative extruder moves
M550 P"My Printer" ; set printer name; Network
M552 S1 ; enable network
M586 P0 S1 ; enable HTTP
M586 P1 S0 ; disable FTP
M586 P2 S0 ; disable Telnet; Drives
M569 P0 S0 ; physical drive 0 goes backwards
M569 P2 S0 ; physical drive 2 goes backwards
M569 P1 S1 ; physical drive 1 goes forwards
M569 P3 S1 ; physical drive 3 goes forwards
M569 P4 S1 ; physical drive 4 goes forwards
M569 P5 S1 ; physical drive 5 goes forwards
M569 P6 S1 ; physical drive 6 goes forwards
M569 P7 S1 ; physical drive 7 goes forwards
M569 P8 S1 ; physical drive 8 goes forwards
M569 P9 S1 ; physical drive 9 goes forwards
M584 X0 Y2 Z1 E3:4:5:6:7:8:9 ; set drive mapping
M350 X16 Y16 Z16 E16:16:16:16:16:16:16 I1 ; configure microstepping with interpolation
M92 X87.58 Y87.58 Z1511.57 E3200.00:3200.00:3200.00:3200.00:3200.00:3200.00:3200.00 ; set steps per mm
M566 X900.00 Y900.00 Z12.00 E120.00:120.00:120.00:120.00:120.00:120.00:120.00 ; set maximum instantaneous speed changes (mm/min)
M203 X6000.00 Y6000.00 Z180.00 E1200.00:1200.00:1200.00:1200.00:1200.00:1200.00:1200.00 ; set maximum speeds (mm/min)
M201 X500.00 Y500.00 Z20.00 E250.00:250.00:250.00:250.00:250.00:250.00:250.00 ; set accelerations (mm/s^2)
M906 X800 Y800 Z800 E800:800:800:800:800:800:800 I30 ; set motor currents (mA) and motor idle factor in per cent
M84 S30 ; Set idle timeout; Axis Limits
M208 X-315 Y-650 Z-50 S1 ; set axis minima
M208 X315 Y650 Z300 S0 ; set axis maxima; Endstops
M574 X0 Y0 Z0 S0 ; set active low and disabled endstops; Z-Probe
M558 P0 H5 F120 T6000 ; disable Z probe but set dive height, probe speed and travel speed
M557 X-300:215 Y-635:195 S20 ; define mesh grid; Heaters
M140 H-1 ; disable heated bed; Fans
M106 P0 C"FAN3" S1 I0 F500 H-1 ; set fan 0 name, value, PWM signal inversion and frequency. Thermostatic control is turned off
M106 P1 C"FAN4" S1 I0 F500 H-1 ; set fan 1 name, value, PWM signal inversion and frequency. Thermostatic control is turned off
M106 P2 C"FAN5" S1 I0 F500 H-1 ; set fan 2 name, value, PWM signal inversion and frequency. Thermostatic control is turned off; Tools
M563 P0 S"V" D0:1:2:3:4 F-1 ; define tool 0
G10 P0 X0 Y0 Z0 ; set tool 0 axis offsets
G10 P0 R0 S0 ; set initial tool 0 active and standby temperatures to 0C
M568 P0 S1 ; enable mixing for tool 0
M567 P0 E0.2:0.2:0.2:0.2:0.2 ; set mixing ratios for tool 0; Custom settings are not defined
; Miscellaneous
T0 ; select first tool -
@Phaedrux - yeah - I wasn't sure if the drive should match the extruder number or the drive number, so I tried both M563 P0 D0:1:2:3:4 and M563 P0 D3:4:5:6:7 am getting the same 'tool creation: bad drive number. I read the sections on drive mapping and tool defining and everything seems to be in order. Unless I missed something. Dumbfounded at the moment.
-
@ractorIII The drive numbers used when you define a tool refer to the extruder drives in the order that they are created. So if you have physical drives assigned to extruders 3 to 7 in M584 then the extruder drive numbers when you define a tool are 0 to 4. Which looks like that's how you have done it.
-
@ractorIII said in Bench Testing Mixing Extruder with Pronterface:
@Phaedrux Nothing happens when I attempt to send gcode through the Duet Web Interface - though the log state that I am connected, the log does not indicate that any code was sent. Another issue that I am having with DWC is that if I attempt to upload the zipped reprap config file I get an AJAX error and it disconnects. If I remember right - I was having this issue before and had to disconnect my power supply from the board and run it strictly of usb to get the upload to work - very inconvenient. I guess I'll open my housing and pull the micro SD out to update reprap config files.
To the issue at hand, which is getting a tool designated for bench testing my extruder setup. The following is how print run responds when issued:
SENDING:M563 P0 D0:1:2:3:4
Error: Tool creation: bad drive number
[ERROR] Error: Tool creation: bad drive numberI'm using a duet wifi with x5 expansion - I have a total of 7 extruder steppers and for this tool I am trying to use the 2 that are on the Duet Wifi and the first 3 that are on the x5 expansion.
Perhaps the M584 command to set up the extruder drives failed. If you send M584 without parameters, what does it report?
EDIT: maximum number of extruders supported by RRF3 on Duet 2 is 6. So your command:
M584 X0 Y2 Z1 E3:4:5:6:7:8:9 ; set drive mapping
is failing because you are trying to create 7 extruders. If you really need 7 then I can increase the limit.
-
thanks @dc42 - I need 5 extruder steppers at the moment - if that is the case I'll remap my motors so my dual Y steppers are not doubled up on one driver. Maybe that will fix my issue - I'll look into your other suggestions later today.
I would be interested in having more extruder steppers available in the future - or even the ability of mapping all of the drivers as extruders - the goal would be precise stationary liquid slurry mixing machine.
-
@deckingman - thanks for your help. Eliminating the E6 driver mapping resolved the issue. All steppers are tested to be operating as expected.
I would like to use that final stepper on the Duex5 as an extruder eventually but will not need it anytime soon.