Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Termistor headache

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    General Discussion
    3
    17
    406
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ziggymanpopoundefined
      ziggymanpopo
      last edited by

      Thanks. 🙂

      droftartsundefined BoAundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • droftartsundefined
        droftarts administrators @ziggymanpopo
        last edited by

        @ziggymanpopo thermistors and PT1000 connect directly to Duet, see https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Connecting_thermistors_or_PT1000_temperature_sensors
        PT100 (and thermocouples) need extra board see https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Connecting_PT100_temperature_sensors

        Ian

        Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ziggymanpopoundefined
          ziggymanpopo
          last edited by

          So no pt 100 without a daughter board is what i got out of all this the tesistance would be to low and read shorted hence froth a fault

          But the pt 1000 can be directly attached
          Is the inline resistor fixed on the duet wifi2

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ziggymanpopoundefined
            ziggymanpopo
            last edited by

            The links helps to understand
            Thanks ian

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BoAundefined
              BoA @ziggymanpopo
              last edited by

              @ziggymanpopo Just to make sure... what meter You use and on which measurement range ?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ziggymanpopoundefined
                ziggymanpopo
                last edited by

                What the limit of the device was i asumed the two were of diferant uses the tp100 being toped out at
                About 300c for example. thats not the case if i read the posted info correctly
                The data stated that the temp range is independant on "manufacturing specifications" and not type
                Also that the pt100 cannot be used without a daughter board thats because of the onboard resistor used doesn't match with the pt100.
                Did i get it right ?

                BoAundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BoAundefined
                  BoA @ziggymanpopo
                  last edited by

                  @ziggymanpopo

                  What the limit of the device was i asumed the two were of diferant uses the tp100 being toped out at
                  About 300c for example. thats not the case if i read the posted info correctly

                  Pt100 and Pt1000 can be used to about 800-1000*C however particular sensor might be limited due to other materials used in it.

                  Also that the pt100 cannot be used without a daughter board thats because of the onboard resistor used doesn't match with the pt100.

                  Basically Yes.

                  droftartsundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ziggymanpopoundefined
                    ziggymanpopo
                    last edited by

                    Thanks ...again 🙂 i like the extra bits you guys put in.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • droftartsundefined
                      droftarts administrators @BoA
                      last edited by

                      @ziggymanpopo

                      Also that the pt100 cannot be used without a daughter board thats because of the onboard resistor used doesn't match with the pt100.

                      Basically Yes.

                      It's a bit more complicated than just changing the resistor in the on-board voltage divider circuit to support PT100. Even if the resistor was changed for an appropriate one, I don't think it would be accurate or sensitive enough to provide good temperature feedback. That's why the daugtherboard uses the MAX31865 for precise feedback.

                      Ian

                      Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

                      BoAundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • BoAundefined
                        BoA @droftarts
                        last edited by BoA

                        @droftarts In general Yes. I just simplified the answer. It could work with changing pullup but pt100 would draw significant current due to low resistance and would also heat up itself and this would lead to inaccuracy (and possibly could destroy platinum strip).

                        Best would be to use current source and amplifier, but MAX31865 for sure solves a lot of issues with reading pt100 (and also pt1000 with proper setup).

                        I could bet that it is more acurate to use PT100 with MAX31865 than pt1000 with simple pullup.

                        Measuring low resistances is a large topic itself, I just did not want to go into it too much.

                        SO pt1000 and some other thermistors have resistance that allow to match pullup resistor, that will not cause too much current flowing to heatup sensor significantly, and yet voltage drop on such sensor is still large enough that can be measured by ADC without fancy amplifiers etc.

                        droftartsundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • droftartsundefined
                          droftarts administrators @BoA
                          last edited by

                          @BoA said in Termistor headache:

                          I could bet that it is more acurate to use PT100 with MAX31865 than pt1000 with simple pullup.

                          https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Connecting_thermistors_or_PT1000_temperature_sensors#Section_PT1000_sensors

                          The accuracy of PT1000 sensors should be very good on the Duet 3 and Duet 2 Maestro and generally good on the Duet 2 Wifi and Ethernet. However, it may be poor on the Duet 0.6, Duet 0.85 and other SAM3X8E-based electronics. For these boards, you can calibrate the Duet's on-board analogue-to-digital converter to improve this

                          Then see https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Connecting_thermistors_or_PT1000_temperature_sensors#Section_Temperature_calibration_and_ADC_tuning further down the page.

                          Yes, PT100 + daughterboard should generally be even more accurate than PT1000, and because it's a daughterboard, should be the same across all Duets.

                          Ian

                          Bed-slinger - Mini5+ WiFi/1LC | RRP Fisher v1 - D2 WiFi | Polargraph - D2 WiFi | TronXY X5S - 6HC/Roto | CNC router - 6HC | Tractus3D T1250 - D2 Eth

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ziggymanpopoundefined
                            ziggymanpopo
                            last edited by

                            Thsnks much better inderstanding now and thanks for the links 😁

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA