Anybody using a Duet board with a Klipper SBC?
-
Interesting - not sure what issues there were with your heated bed. Haven't had any weirdness like that.
as for the aligning of the x axises, not sure what you're going for, but there are several routines for adjustment, what were you looking to do? is there a baked-in RRF gcode for it?
as for annex specifying duet boards, recent BOM's switched from SKR -> Fystek S6 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oXqvtk06rsHcD06igabW3sL7RkIG_uLstGmKU9D9Gv8/edit#gid=1410625863
CROXY specifies Duet Boards.
I hope to have definitive comparisons to help out with these discussions and raise the bar for everyone!
-
Here is a good Klipper introduction video by the Voron guy. One of his Klipper based printers is based on a Duet2 and has a functioning Panel Due (Around 15:45 time mark).
-
@zapta said in Anybody using a Duet board with a Klipper SBC?:
Here is a good Klipper introduction video by the Voron guy. One of his Klipper based printers is based on a Duet2 and has a functioning Panel Due (Around 15:45 time mark).
you can add [?|&]t=945 to the url to jump to the timecode in seconds or "use the copy video url at current time" option form the context menu in youtube https://youtu.be/iNHta6zljoM?t=945
-
@Luke-sLaboratory any chance you can send me your config file ? Duet 3 mini should be close enought to duet 6hc.. Im still trying to find the stepper address for the 6hc board.
-
Just wanted to add that besides input shaper RRF has more on it's road map:
https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/20602/reprapfirmware-road-map-q1-2021?_=1615749405350
"RRF 3.4: the focus of this will be the motion system. We will be looking at input shaping, S-curve acceleration, better cornering algorithms, and other mechanisms to improve print quality. "
-
@Argo said in Anybody using a Duet board with a Klipper SBC?:
RRF 3.4: the focus of this will be the motion system
Hopefully that release will significantly benefit my Duet2 Wifi, no extenders, no SBC printer. The recent releases seem to be 'for other people'.
BTW, looking more into the Klipper, its two tiers architecture of an SBC tied to heterogenous 'dumb' I/O slaves seems to be simpler, more open, and more promising than the Duet's 3 tier approach of a SBC, a proprietary smart controller and proprietary slave controllers (extenders, tool boards, etc). I like it more and more, but don't have yet real life experience with it.
-
I tested klipper on duet WiFi and deux5 this weekend. I run true bed leveling with it quite fine and the input shaper does magic. The UI is not great compared to duet but I might stay with it because of the magic the input shaper does. Wish I could add a photo here easy and I’ll show the huge difference.
Managed to crash my Z axis during setup so I got some Z banding now but I can’t blame klipper for a user error
-
@minim said in Anybody using a Duet board with a Klipper SBC?:
Wish I could add a photo here easy and I’ll show the huge difference.
copy n' paste and drag n' drop should work for pictures, there is also the upload image icon on the toolbar (second last)
-
@minim said in Anybody using a Duet board with a Klipper SBC?:
The UI is not great compared to duet
I hear this Is a criticism often levelled at Klipper. By no means an endorsement, but I did find this recently: https://github.com/Stephan3/dwc2-for-klipper-socket
Ian
-
@gaweyo It was a bit easier from a pc than from my phone
I have some issues in the Z axis after a crash during config but it still shows great improvement of ringing in the lower print with input shaper enabled. Upper print is without input shaper. Both are done with 1500mms accleration increasing each 5mm up to 7000mm/s accleration and the print speed is 100mm/s.
-
@minim said in Anybody using a Duet board with a Klipper SBC?:
it still shows great improvement of ringing
Improvement is very significant. Does the printer sound quiet or more graceful at high speeds?
-
@minim take a look at fluidd - it's excellent.
-
@zapta yeah it does actually. I don’t think I will switch back even if I hate SBC
