Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Beta Firmware
    25
    205
    25.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Adrian52undefined
      Adrian52 @skrotz
      last edited by

      @skrotz I got a nice result with pa disabled using ei3.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • skrotzundefined
        skrotz @CadetC
        last edited by

        @cadetc cubes printed on RRF 3.3 with same filament are fine, and the extrusion issues on 3.4 are not random, they happen at the same exact place each print. It’s not the filament.

        dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • dc42undefined
          dc42 administrators @skrotz
          last edited by

          @skrotz said in RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available:

          @cadetc cubes printed on RRF 3.3 with same filament are fine, and the extrusion issues on 3.4 are not random, they happen at the same exact place each print. It’s not the filament.

          Is this with input shaping disabled and PA enabled; or some other combination?

          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

          skrotzundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MikeSundefined
            MikeS @dc42
            last edited by MikeS

            @dc42 said in RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available:

            @mikes said in RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available:

            @dc42 Is the LIS3DSH already implemented in these beta binaries? If so i could give it a try and check if PA and IS are giving problem also on my build running fine with the stable 3.3. I've already printed some part that i can compare

            Yes, but only when connected directly to the main board via SPI at present.

            if I understand correctly i can use it connected to the duex5 with a duet2wifi right?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dc42undefined
              dc42 administrators
              last edited by

              @mikes said in RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available:

              @dc42 said in RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available:

              @mikes said in RRF 3.4 input shaping preview available:

              @dc42 Is the LIS3DSH already implemented in these beta binaries? If so i could give it a try and check if PA and IS are giving problem also on my build running fine with the stable 3.3. I've already printed some part that i can compare

              Yes, but only when connected directly to the main board via SPI at present.

              if I understand correctly i can use it connected to the duex5 with a duet2wifi right?

              Yes.

              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JenPetundefined
                JenPet @JenPet
                last edited by

                I have tried the new uploaded firmware but I have still the issue, that at the end of an move is not enough material when PA is on.
                Here M122:
                === Move ===
                DMs created 83, segments created 42, maxWait 226006ms, bed compensation in use: none, comp offset 0.000
                === MainDDARing ===
                Scheduled moves 3997, completed moves 3997, hiccups 0, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1
                === AuxDDARing ===
                Scheduled moves 0, completed moves 0, hiccups 0, stepErrors 0, LaErrors 0, Underruns [0, 0, 0], CDDA state -1

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • MikeSundefined
                  MikeS
                  last edited by MikeS

                  @jenpet So i tried the latest beta and also noticed cluncky movements. That appeared only when i turned up acceleration to 7000mm/s. It does it also when i do movement for accelerometer to gather data. If i put acceleration down to 4000mm/s it does move smoothly. Also only ZVDD and EI2 seems to be affected. I attach a video of the testing i did. Also wiring is temporary and only for these tests, i'm not measuring real resonance with it i think.

                  @dc42 LIS3DSH working good! Nice work!

                  Youtube video

                  EDIT: Just found i was setting an acceleration greather than the one defined in M201.Rising the M201 values solved it.However i think this is not an expected behaviour.

                  JenPetundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JenPetundefined
                    JenPet @MikeS
                    last edited by JenPet

                    @mikes I tried 7000 to 2000 acceleration but the issue is still there. I have tried zvdd and ei2.

                    I had a similar issue like in your video. Which jerk values do you use?

                    MikeSundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MikeSundefined
                      MikeS @JenPet
                      last edited by MikeS

                      @jenpet Right now these are my settings, but not sure if they are good. I'm just trying atm:

                      M566 X1500 Y1500 Z60 E8000          ; Set maximum instantaneous speed changes (mm/min)
                      M203 X20000 Y20000 Z6000 E15000 	; Set maximum speeds (mm/min)
                      M201 X20000 Y20000 Z3000 E1800      ; Set maximum accelerations (mm/s^2)    
                      M204 P7000 T7000 					; Set printing acceleration and travel accelerations
                      

                      Be sure that your M201 has higher values that the one in M204. This was the issue for me

                      JenPetundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JenPetundefined
                        JenPet @MikeS
                        last edited by

                        @mikes I am using lower values, I would try it
                        M566 X300.00 Y300.00 Z24.00 E300.00 P1 ; set maximum instantaneous speed changes (mm/min)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • skrotzundefined
                          skrotz @dc42
                          last edited by skrotz

                          @dc42 I think the breakdown so far for 7-28 3.4 build is:

                          With No PA and no input shaping, things look normal. No extrusion blobs or zits. Corners bulge a bit due to no PA as one would expect. (Just did this print). Things look identical to RRF 3.3.

                          With no PA, but EI3 input shaping enabled, I get no clunking or hiccups/errors, but I do get some small occasional extrusion zits/blobs, in the same place each print. Corners bulge a bit more than the print with no PA and no input shaping - probably an artifact from the ei3 input shaping?

                          With PA at 0.12 and no input shaping, I am getting the clunking noise, usually when printing the gyroid infill. I do not get this clunking with 3.3, it is abnormal. The print has extrusion issues.. lines where the head is moving to print the X or the Y of the cube seem to be over extruded at times, some maybe under extruded. Parts of the X look a bit jagged. (just did this print). M122 reports 2679 hiccups but no errors for MainDDARing move stats.

                          I assume with PA and EI3 input shaping, I'll get clunking plus the layer shift others are reporting, but I haven't done that print yet on 7-28 3.4.

                          dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • dc42undefined
                            dc42 administrators @skrotz
                            last edited by

                            @skrotz thanks for the feedback. I have found a bug that may explain the issue when PA is enabled, and I expect to make a new binary available tomorrow.

                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                            skrotzundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • nurooundefined
                              nuroo
                              last edited by

                              Sry to butt in, but this is the most active accelerometer thread.
                              Have the LIS3DH installed on my printhead. I'm not sure if I chose the correct orientation for the sensor in relation to my actually printer xyz axis. Hoping for an auto setup feature in firmware which deterimes orientation of sensor and configures itself.

                              20210606_181844 (1).jpg

                              MikeSundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • MikeSundefined
                                MikeS @nuroo
                                last edited by

                                @nuroo I don't know which orientation your chip is on the board but if your drawing is correct for sure the first number of I parameter should be 0 (top of the chip facing +X axis). Probably your second number should be 5 (-Y) or 1 (+y), it depends on how the chip is placed on the board.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • dc42undefined
                                  dc42 administrators @nuroo
                                  last edited by

                                  @nuroo identify which of the images at https://www.dropbox.com/s/hu2w5mk57l4zqpg/Accelerometer Orientation.pdf matches your setup.

                                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • MikeSundefined
                                    MikeS
                                    last edited by MikeS

                                    So today i tried my first real print with the new beta and also i'm hearing the extruder doing something weird with PA on. It's more noticeable during sharp corners (for example in the transition from 1 perimeters to the next one).
                                    Actually i'm using this:

                                    M572 D0 S0.03
                                    

                                    Video of the print where you can hear the "clicks" will be soon available there:
                                    https://youtu.be/7EV2qz565SQ

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • nurooundefined
                                      nuroo
                                      last edited by nuroo

                                      @MikeS @dc42

                                      Thanks for trying to help. I did see the orientation.pdf but I was unable to determine which orientation I should choose based on the picutures because I have the adafruit sensor. When I initially set up the sensor I chose I50, but I'm unsure if it correct.

                                      M955 P0 C"spi.cs6+spi.cs5" I50 Q2000000 ;LIS3DH Adafruit2809

                                      The main point I failed to make with my past post was I wish the firmware determined the correct orientation. Couldnt the printer do a series of moves and see how user has sensor mounted??
                                      I mean the printer knows what are the correct X and Y axis. If printer issues an X+ move but sensor registers a Z- for example. Then another movement to determine 1 other axis. 2 axis known. Third movement unnesscary because if 2 axis known, third is whats left???

                                      I imagine lots of troubleshooting ahead if users are picking the wrong orientation. Then try to tune the wrong axis to fix ringing <<--like this guy 🙂
                                      Screenshot_20210730-130410_Gallery.jpg

                                      MikeSundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • MikeSundefined
                                        MikeS @nuroo
                                        last edited by

                                        @nuroo thanks for the photo! From these i can see that your accelerometer Z axis is facing -X (4) and X axis is facing -Y (5) so your correct I parameter should be 45.

                                        For the auto detection i think it wouldn't be a problem but also finding it manually is not so complicated once you understand how it works. Also this need to be done only one time if you don't plan to move the accelerometer.

                                        I'm planning on also removing the accelerometer once the readings are done and installing it only if i retighten the belts.

                                        nurooundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • nurooundefined
                                          nuroo @MikeS
                                          last edited by

                                          @mikes thank u, Sir.

                                          I would never have chosen that orientation even after viewing the pdf. It confuses me, I wont be the only one I think.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • skrotzundefined
                                            skrotz @dc42
                                            last edited by

                                            @dc42 any new firmwares to test!? I’m able to do testing more easily on the weekends…

                                            dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA