Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Rotating Magnetic Sensor - Keeps Pausing Printer

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Filament Monitor
    9
    151
    9.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • alankilianundefined
      alankilian @T3P3Tony
      last edited by alankilian

      @t3p3tony

      Here's the test file: CalciumCup.gcode

      I'll adjust and try printing a few more times on Monday.

      My sensor is just below the extruder and moves around a little bit with the bowden movement.
      I should probably move it above the extruder.

      I'll also try that on Monday after getting the AGC in a better range.

      IMG_6698.JPG

      SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • alankilianundefined
        alankilian @dc42
        last edited by

        @dc42

        Unfortunately, I can't get the AGC under about 115 without the pointy-bits of the brass roller starting to scratch the surface of the sensor chip and not moving all the time.

        You mentioned stronger magnets. Are they available?

        Otherwise I may try sanding the top surface of the sensor chip a little.
        I figure there's enough plastic above the sensor I can get the tiny amount of space I need to get a better AGC value.

        SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

        T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T3P3Tonyundefined
          T3P3Tony administrators @alankilian
          last edited by

          @alankilian yes if you drop me a line (info@duet3d.com) i can look at arranging a replacement assembly.

          www.duet3d.com

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • wouldstainundefined
            wouldstain @T3P3Tony
            last edited by

            @t3p3tony im actually still running 3.3 but I will upgrade today to 3.4b5 and 3.4b5+1 progressively.
            I just wanted to confirm the file(s) I needed. Should I be using the combined version?

            thank you!

            T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T3P3Tonyundefined
              T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
              last edited by

              @wouldstain the instructions i posted above for alankilian should work for you if you are using Duet 2. do Duet 3 substitute the appropriate firmware binary for your board.

              www.duet3d.com

              T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T3P3Tonyundefined
                T3P3Tony administrators @T3P3Tony
                last edited by

                I have done a quite a few tests now and over the short print snippets I have been using I have got consistently good results (wider window than 90%-105%) until PA gets greater than 0.4, with higher pressure advance i see drops down to 70% but still nothing like the 10%, 0% -n% that we were seeing before.

                I have more tests to do with different retraction distances and print speeds but this is looking very promising. I would be interested in gcode files (preferably short!) that still get poor results with the new build of firmware (3.4b5+1) where all other factors are limited (i.e. good mag readings, short filament path between the extruder and the sensor).

                www.duet3d.com

                wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • wouldstainundefined
                  wouldstain @T3P3Tony
                  last edited by wouldstain

                  @t3p3tony Updated firmware and DWC as requested. Printed up a batch of those drywall anchors today with no problem out of PETG.

                  As soon as I switched to PLA it started happening again:

                  Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 75, measured sensitivity 30.28mm/rev, min 0% max 121% over 97.7mm

                  m572 d0
                  Extruder pressure advance: 0.070

                  PLA_Test-xyzCalibration_cube.gcode

                  Ran again:

                  m591 d0
                  Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 75, measured sensitivity 40.48mm/rev, min -1% max 154% over 33.8mm

                  T3P3Tonyundefined dc42undefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T3P3Tonyundefined
                    T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
                    last edited by

                    @wouldstain thanks for the report.

                    Other than the temperature is the only difference between your PETG prints and PLA prints the pressure advance?

                    You may have already posted it but please post your config.g so i can use those settings in my test.

                    www.duet3d.com

                    wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dc42undefined
                      dc42 administrators @wouldstain
                      last edited by

                      @wouldstain is the only difference between the PLA and PETG prints is the hot end and bed temperatures? If so, then it's likely that your extruder is skipping steps or losing its grip on the filament, and the filament monitor is reporting correctly. PLA is harder for the extruder to push through the nozzle then PETG is.

                      You could test this by printing at a high temperature, to make it easier for the extruder to push the filament through. It may result in rubbish print quality, but if it improves the filament monitor readings then it will have identified the problem.

                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                      wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T3P3Tonyundefined
                        T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
                        last edited by T3P3Tony

                        @wouldstain also what results were you getting with PETG on the drywall insert?

                        Also looking at the PLA gcode you share, you are printing it at 235C.. have you had success with that temp for PLA in the past?

                        www.duet3d.com

                        wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • wouldstainundefined
                          wouldstain @T3P3Tony
                          last edited by

                          @t3p3tony I have had good results with PLA at higher temps.

                          I have tried printing at lower temps. the only difference on test / calibration prints seems to be the strength of interlayer adhesion.

                          I can certainly dial it down if you think it would make a difference.

                          T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • wouldstainundefined
                            wouldstain @dc42
                            last edited by

                            @dc42 I normally have higher retraction distance and speed settings to reduce stringing on PETG, so aside from decreasing both while using PLA, really no difference.

                            I've tried printing PLA with higher temps (accounting for either toolsteel or hardened steel nozzle) but it doesnt seem to matter.

                            @JohnOCFII has the following in his prusa config:

                            {if printer_notes=~/.PRINTER_VENDOR_PRUSA3D./}M900 K45{else}M572 D0 S0.06{endif} ; Filament-specific Linear Advance or Pressure Advance

                            but I've also tried slicing with this commented out and gotten the same results.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • wouldstainundefined
                              wouldstain @T3P3Tony
                              last edited by

                              @t3p3tony

                              about to run test @250C. Will post console output (assuming it pauses)

                              config.g attached. modified slightly from previous to account for addition of garolite sheet on build plate.

                              WS_110321_config.g

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
                                last edited by

                                @wouldstain said in Rotating Magnetic Sensor - Keeps Pausing Printer:

                                I can certainly dial it down if you think it would make a difference.

                                no i don't - that was just an question seeing it at 235.

                                www.duet3d.com

                                wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • wouldstainundefined
                                  wouldstain @T3P3Tony
                                  last edited by

                                  @t3p3tony gotcha.
                                  Just ran it at 250C. got this at less than 6%:

                                  Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 75, measured sensitivity 26.29mm/rev, min 1% max 107% over 136.1mm

                                  same cube.

                                  T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                    T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
                                    last edited by

                                    @wouldstain I printed that on the test rig:
                                    5ed4bee5-8bcc-4ab8-b129-6ee48d774e88-image.png

                                    That was before I got your config so i need to change to your config.

                                    Can you try printing one of the drywall anchors in PLA with the PLA settings to see if you get the same issue (trying to see if its related to the PA/retract settings which are different). Also a short print to recreate the issue would be good.

                                    www.duet3d.com

                                    T3P3Tonyundefined wouldstainundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                      T3P3Tony administrators @T3P3Tony
                                      last edited by

                                      I also need to switch the test rig back to Duet 2 from Duet 3 mini.

                                      www.duet3d.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • wouldstainundefined
                                        wouldstain @T3P3Tony
                                        last edited by wouldstain

                                        @t3p3tony

                                        Drywall anchor @ 250C:

                                        Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 75, measured sensitivity 219.24mm/rev, min 6% max 128% over 19.5mm

                                        only got about 2% into it before stopping.

                                        PLA_250C_Drywall_Anchor.gcode

                                        FYI also have PETG printing at -.15 offset via babysteps so I did reset it for PLA.

                                        alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • alankilianundefined
                                          alankilian @wouldstain
                                          last edited by

                                          @wouldstain

                                          My printer has (0,0) in the center.
                                          Is there an easy way for me to provide an offset so I can try printing your .gcode?

                                          Or can you slice it centered on (0,0) for me to test with?

                                          SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                                          wouldstainundefined T3P3Tonyundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • wouldstainundefined
                                            wouldstain @alankilian
                                            last edited by

                                            @alankilian
                                            Not sure how that would be possible as slicer is set up for my railcore rig.
                                            Center is somewhere around 150,150.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA