Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Rotating Magnetic Sensor - Keeps Pausing Printer

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved
    Filament Monitor
    9
    151
    9.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T3P3Tonyundefined
      T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
      last edited by

      @wouldstain I printed that on the test rig:
      5ed4bee5-8bcc-4ab8-b129-6ee48d774e88-image.png

      That was before I got your config so i need to change to your config.

      Can you try printing one of the drywall anchors in PLA with the PLA settings to see if you get the same issue (trying to see if its related to the PA/retract settings which are different). Also a short print to recreate the issue would be good.

      www.duet3d.com

      T3P3Tonyundefined wouldstainundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T3P3Tonyundefined
        T3P3Tony administrators @T3P3Tony
        last edited by

        I also need to switch the test rig back to Duet 2 from Duet 3 mini.

        www.duet3d.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • wouldstainundefined
          wouldstain @T3P3Tony
          last edited by wouldstain

          @t3p3tony

          Drywall anchor @ 250C:

          Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 75, measured sensitivity 219.24mm/rev, min 6% max 128% over 19.5mm

          only got about 2% into it before stopping.

          PLA_250C_Drywall_Anchor.gcode

          FYI also have PETG printing at -.15 offset via babysteps so I did reset it for PLA.

          alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • alankilianundefined
            alankilian @wouldstain
            last edited by

            @wouldstain

            My printer has (0,0) in the center.
            Is there an easy way for me to provide an offset so I can try printing your .gcode?

            Or can you slice it centered on (0,0) for me to test with?

            SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

            wouldstainundefined T3P3Tonyundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • wouldstainundefined
              wouldstain @alankilian
              last edited by

              @alankilian
              Not sure how that would be possible as slicer is set up for my railcore rig.
              Center is somewhere around 150,150.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • wouldstainundefined
                wouldstain @T3P3Tony
                last edited by

                @t3p3tony Ran another print at 195C just to test.
                got about 60% through it then stopped:

                m591 d0
                Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 75, measured sensitivity 28.51mm/rev, min -25% max 130% over 132.7mm

                T3P3Tonyundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T3P3Tonyundefined
                  T3P3Tony administrators @alankilian
                  last edited by

                  @alankilian

                  @dc42 used this to offset the prints so they can br printed with e bed centered on 0,0

                  ; Remove the following line if your bed isn't centred on X0 Y0
                  G10 L2 P1 X-150 Y-150

                  offsets the coordinate system by 150mm in both X and Y.

                  Use with caution!

                  www.duet3d.com

                  alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T3P3Tonyundefined
                    T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
                    last edited by

                    @wouldstain thanks for the reports.

                    Can you confirm the changes between PETG and PLA in your setup:

                    1. Print temperature (don't think this matters as long as prints are working)
                    2. Print Speed?
                    3. Retraction distance (looks like 2mm in both files)?
                    4. PA setting? (looks like PLA = M572 D0 S0.06, PETG = M572 D0 S0.07?)
                    5. Anything else?

                    Cheers

                    www.duet3d.com

                    wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • alankilianundefined
                      alankilian @T3P3Tony
                      last edited by

                      @t3p3tony

                      Thanks for the offset infor.

                      Neither Sinplify3D nor my online GCODE viewer pay attention to G10, so I was unable to figure it out myself.

                      Printing PLA at 210C I get:

                      Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 28.80mm/rev, allow 60% to 160%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 117, measured sensitivity 24.51mm/rev, min 94% max 113% over 171.5mm

                      SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • T3P3Tonyundefined
                        T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
                        last edited by

                        @wouldstain tested this on a Duet 2 with my current config:

                        Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 24.78mm/rev, allow 0% to 150%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 132 agc 60, measured sensitivity 24.58mm/rev, min 96% max 110% over 190.2mm
                        
                        Finished printing file 0:/gcodes/pla_250c_drywall_anchor.gcode, print time was 0h 14m
                        

                        www.duet3d.com

                        T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T3P3Tonyundefined
                          T3P3Tony administrators @T3P3Tony
                          last edited by T3P3Tony

                          @wouldstain and now with your config (except for removing the bits that don't apply to the test rig):

                          Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 131 agc 60, measured sensitivity 24.52mm/rev, min 95% max 111% over 190.2mm
                          
                          Finished printing file 0:/gcodes/pla_250c_drywall_anchor.gcode, print time was 0h 14m
                          

                          That is with a Hermera. I will switch back to the titan as well for a further test.

                          www.duet3d.com

                          T3P3Tonyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T3P3Tonyundefined
                            T3P3Tony administrators @T3P3Tony
                            last edited by

                            @wouldstain and now with the Titan:

                            Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 129 agc 59, measured sensitivity 23.78mm/rev, min 95% max 106% over 180.9mm
                            
                            Finished printing file 0:/gcodes/pla_250c_drywall_anchor.gcode, print time was 0h 14m
                            

                            So can't reproduce this with your setup on my extruders. can you do me a favour and print a PETG print (the drywall anchor) and then print the PLA print (same as before) without making changes in between other than temperature an PA as needed and see if you get the differences you have seen earlier between PETG settings and PLA.

                            www.duet3d.com

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • wouldstainundefined
                              wouldstain @T3P3Tony
                              last edited by

                              @T3P3Tony

                              Ran this using a different spool of PETG only because its what I had loaded this morning (Atomic Starry Night).

                              1. Temp
                                PETG: 235 start, 230 other layers
                                PLA: 235 start, 230 other layers

                              2. Print Speed:
                                PETG: 60 perim / 80 infill
                                PLA: 60 perim / 80 infill

                              3. Retraction settings:
                                PETG: 7mm / 25mm/sec
                                PLA: 2mm / 25mm/sec

                              4. PA settings (in this instance):
                                PETG: .06
                                PLA: .07

                              5. Z offset for PETG = -.15

                              Really not a lot of difference.

                              I have tried adjusting all of the above settings when printing with PLA with no improvement.

                              wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • wouldstainundefined
                                wouldstain @wouldstain
                                last edited by

                                @wouldstain Was actually able to successfully print a drywall anchor in both PETG and PLA using the PETG setting (including Z offset) however, was unable to complete 20mm calibration cube in PLA using same settings.

                                T3P3Tonyundefined wouldstainundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                  T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
                                  last edited by

                                  @wouldstain ahh ok the difference I missed in original PETG file you shared was the 7mm retractions, however the 2mm on PLA is working well in my tests.

                                  Would be good to see the actual results reported by M591 for the PETG and PLA drywall prints that worked and the PLA cube that did not.

                                  www.duet3d.com

                                  wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • wouldstainundefined
                                    wouldstain @wouldstain
                                    last edited by wouldstain

                                    @wouldstain

                                    had a couple successful PLA prints on the drywall anchor using the PETG settings.
                                    1x1, 1x2. failed on 2x3.

                                    Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 26.50mm/rev, allow 1% to 200%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 75, measured sensitivity 26.60mm/rev, min -30% max 111% over 443.4mm

                                    there does not seem to be any rhyme or reason to it.

                                    I am going to switch back to PETG as I have something else I need to print.

                                    BTW I've had the same problem with several different spools of PLA from different manufacturers.

                                    I had been experiencing this with PETG but far less frequently but have not had an occurrence since installing the beta+1 version as instructed.

                                    Just to make things more interesting, I'm seeing this in the console in several locations:

                                    G28
                                    Error: G0/G1: insufficient axes homed
                                    File 0:/gcodes/Drywall_Anchor_PLA_2x3_Test.gcode selected for printing

                                    i tested and verified that the endstops are working.

                                    Please let me know what to try next.

                                    alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • alankilianundefined
                                      alankilian @wouldstain
                                      last edited by

                                      I've been printing a few smallish things the last couple of days and it seems that the magnetic filament monitor is really working for me now!

                                      Duet3D rotating magnet filament monitor v3 on pin e0stop, enabled, sensitivity 28.80mm/rev, allow 60% to 160%, check every 3.0mm, version 3, mag 130 agc 119, measured sensitivity 25.90mm/rev, min 96% max 104% over 3793.7mm
                                      

                                      Thanks for working on this again.

                                      I can do test-prints if anyone has suspicious files.

                                      SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • wouldstainundefined
                                        wouldstain @T3P3Tony
                                        last edited by

                                        @t3p3tony
                                        I'll run them again once the current job completes.

                                        Is there a way to get any sort of verbose logging out of the duet board? I can telnet to it or connect a USB cable. It would be interesting to get detailed state info leading up to this.

                                        T3P3Tonyundefined dc42undefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • T3P3Tonyundefined
                                          T3P3Tony administrators @wouldstain
                                          last edited by

                                          @wouldstain I don't think there is much more infor available from the logging. What would be good is cutting down the print (you can run it above the bed rather than as an actual print) to just a layer to two that triggers the 0/-'ve results.

                                          www.duet3d.com

                                          wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • dc42undefined
                                            dc42 administrators @wouldstain
                                            last edited by

                                            @wouldstain do you still get the problem if you print with PLA using exactly the same settings as as you did for the successful PETG print, apart from temperatures? In particular, using the same pressure advance and retraction settings, if your hot end can handle that when using PLA.

                                            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                            wouldstainundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA