Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    [3.4.0beta7] new input shaper disturb pressure advance

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Beta Firmware
    3
    12
    1.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Phaedruxundefined
      Phaedrux Moderator
      last edited by

      yes it has been said that pressure advance will likely need to be retuned after setting an input shaper. You may also need to adjust jerk and acceleration. Input shaping is also currently experimental, so things like this are to be expected. So thanks for reporting your findings. Could you perhaps show a photo example of your different findings and values? And some more details about your printer?

      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

      Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Argoundefined
        Argo @Phaedrux
        last edited by Argo

        @phaedrux

        Oh, sorry, I forgot.

        Voron 2.4 with LGX extruder and Mosquito Hotend
        Duet 3 Mini5+
        Speed: 120 mm/s
        Acceleration: 3.000 mm/s

        And I know that it's still beta. I'm not complaining, just reporting 😊

        PLA, EI2 shaper and PA at 0.15:

        IMG_0506.jpg

        Bottom right is almost ok but upper right corner overshoots. Normal PA values for PLA are 0.05 up to 0.7 for this setup.

        PCRundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • PCRundefined
          PCR @Argo
          last edited by

          @argo yes. PA has to be tuned again. 😉 And it depends which shaper you are using. I already opened a thread on it.

          For me it's

          Flow-IS-PA-Retract

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • PCRundefined
            PCR @Argo
            last edited by

            @argo and yes my PA is now higher than before.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • PCRundefined
              PCR @Argo
              last edited by

              @argo https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/25831/input-shaping-and-pa Thats my thread. I done more testing too.

              Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Argoundefined
                Argo @PCR
                last edited by

                @pcr

                Oh I did not look in General Discussion as this is a beta feature.

                Were you able to produce the same results with a higher PA value?
                If I increase my PA value too much with input shaping enabled some corners begin to starve.

                I wonder if that's a wanted behaviour. Besides the Voron we also have a bed slinger printer with Klipper. PA almost did not change with input shaping enabled.

                PCRundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • PCRundefined
                  PCR @Argo
                  last edited by

                  @argo it tuned my PA with this https://forum.duet3d.com/topic/25764/pressure-advance-tuning-with-conditional-g-code/

                  so first IS then this.

                  are you using arcwelder aswell? I had problems with PA and arcwelder before

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Argoundefined
                    Argo
                    last edited by Argo

                    Another discovery I made:

                    In order to get good sharp corners I have to bump up PA quite a bit. From 0.07 up to 0.18.

                    But then the infill has issues and begins to starve which is a expected behaviour from such a high PA value for PLA.

                    IMG_0512.jpg

                    Edit:
                    Did another test with ZVD shaper: pressure advance is at 0.07 - 0.075 for PLA and corners look nike + infill is not starving.
                    I guess the shapers with longer shaper duration somehow mess with pressure advance right now?

                    Phaedruxundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Phaedruxundefined
                      Phaedrux Moderator @Argo
                      last edited by

                      @argo said in [3.4.0beta6] new input shaper disturb pressure advance:

                      But then the infill has issues and begins to starve which is a expected behaviour from such a high PA value for PLA.

                      This is not uncommon with PA and it's recommended to compensate by increasing the infill overlap in the slicer.

                      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

                      Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Argoundefined
                        Argo @Phaedrux
                        last edited by

                        @phaedrux

                        This would work if the effect is the same on all infill paths.
                        The last picture I posted has huge gap on one specific infill part. Other parts look fine though.
                        I don't really see a way to compensate this with the slicer without causing problems on other parts.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Argoundefined Argo referenced this topic
                        • Argoundefined
                          Argo
                          last edited by

                          RRF 3.4b7:

                          I first calibrated my PA.

                          IMG_0801.jpg

                          Then some real world testing with PA set to 0.064 and

                          IMG_0872.jpg

                          To get rid of the bulging I would need to increase to very high PA values which does impact all other areas whilst printing like starving infill ends etc. (see pictures above).

                          Used input shaper: M593 P"zvdd" F54.32

                          With RRF 3.3 I had similar PA values but no overshooting corners.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • Argoundefined Argo referenced this topic
                          • Argoundefined Argo referenced this topic
                          • Argoundefined Argo referenced this topic
                          • Argoundefined Argo referenced this topic
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA