Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Adding support for the enraged rabbit carrot feeder (ERCF)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Accessories and Add-ons
    12
    64
    11.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dc42undefined
      dc42 administrators @pfn
      last edited by

      @pfn is the main issue that you want to use a variable to specify which axis controls the feeder, and to use that axis letter in various GCode commands?

      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

      pfnundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • o_lampeundefined
        o_lampe @pfn
        last edited by o_lampe

        @pfn
        I wonder which features a toolboard needs to run an ERCF?

        • two extruder drivers
        • a servo header
        • filament sensor(s) (how many)
        • anything else?

        I've watched a few videos and IMHO the filament change takes a lot of time. Would it make sense to use a stronger motor/driver for the filament feeder? Maybe even a Servo motor?

        Can you imagine a Delta with direct drive effector and a flying rabbit for extra short filament path...

        pfnundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • pfnundefined
          pfn @dc42
          last edited by

          @dc42 that's right, I don't necessarily want to force specific axis designations, at least not yet

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • pfnundefined
            pfn @o_lampe
            last edited by

            @o_lampe filament changes take a while for a number of reasons.

            • tip forming: it's an extruder unload operation with a built in cooling period that's several seconds long (my unloads take longer than the bowden transition as it needs to retract slowly in order to allow the filament to harden). My tip forming isn't tuned yet, but at the moment it's a 10mm extrusion at 5mm/s, followed by unloading 80mm at 5mm/s; this part is actually really what takes longest
            • loading the bowden, in an ercf that's working well, it can be as fast as 200mm/s. My d-shaft is bent, so I'm limited to about 40mm/s before stalling. The typical speeds otherwise are 100-170mm/s here. That would be 5-10 seconds to load a 1meter long bowden
            • various sanity checks to look for the presence of filament throughout the entire process

            In terms of necessity for a toolboard, I'd say the same components as the ezboard:

            • 2 stepper drivers
            • 5v, gnd
            • endstop input
            • encoder input
            • servo output

            In my limited experience so far, I'm not finding a print head filament sensor necessary yet.

            PCRundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • PCRundefined
              PCR @pfn
              last edited by

              @pfn @dc42
              would it be possible to make a sammy C21 based board with 2 steppers?

              dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators @PCR
                last edited by

                @pcr yes that should be possible. You could base the design on the Tool Board, but allocate two output pins for step and direction signals to the second driver, and an input pin for the DIAG output of the second driver. Two TMC2209 drivers can share the ENN pin and the UART pins.

                The STEP pins for the two drivers should preferably be on the same port (A or B) because that is what RRF expects, so that it can achieve the highest step rates.

                The TMC2209 has two pins that select the slave address. You should tie them to Vcc and ground so as to give the two drivers addresses 0 and 1.

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                PCRundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Alex.crundefined
                  Alex.cr @pfn
                  last edited by

                  @pfn

                  This is brilliant. I am in the process of printing everything and waiting for my kit to show up to put it together. Nice work!

                  Voron2.4/Duet3 SBC+6HC+3HC+1LC+1HCL(x2) - Delta/Duet2 Wifi - CubePro/Duet2 Wifi+Duex5 - Laser/Duet3 Mini5+ - Cel Robox - U̶p̶3̶0̶0̶+/D̶u̶e̶t̶3̶ ̶6̶H̶C̶+̶LC1̶ - F̶T̶-̶5̶/̶D̶u̶e̶t̶2̶ ̶W̶i̶f̶i̶ - S̶o̶l̶i̶d̶o̶o̶d̶l̶e̶

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • Alex.crundefined
                    Alex.cr @pfn
                    last edited by

                    @pfn

                    On a side note, why have settings.g and globals.g? Why not just use globals.g?

                    Voron2.4/Duet3 SBC+6HC+3HC+1LC+1HCL(x2) - Delta/Duet2 Wifi - CubePro/Duet2 Wifi+Duex5 - Laser/Duet3 Mini5+ - Cel Robox - U̶p̶3̶0̶0̶+/D̶u̶e̶t̶3̶ ̶6̶H̶C̶+̶LC1̶ - F̶T̶-̶5̶/̶D̶u̶e̶t̶2̶ ̶W̶i̶f̶i̶ - S̶o̶l̶i̶d̶o̶o̶d̶l̶e̶

                    pfnundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • pfnundefined
                      pfn @Alex.cr
                      last edited by pfn

                      @alex-cr I prefer to make it so that there are some sane defaults and users can modify only what is necessary in settings, less clutter for the user to look at.

                      That's not to say that a user cannot edit globals.g and must edit settings.g -- one could completely ignore settings.g; but I feel it's a disservice to do so. One would have to repeat the setting twice (the initial declaration is guarded by if exists) and that adds to clutter.

                      The only inelegance of this approach is the selector_slotX_pos problem that requires a user to edit globals.g to remove slots if using a 4 cart system

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • PCRundefined
                        PCR @dc42
                        last edited by

                        @dc42

                        this would be the sammy pinout

                        24a95a33-4f6c-487d-80ec-76329821bbd3-grafik.png

                        this should work?

                        dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators @PCR
                          last edited by

                          @pcr you need both a Tx (normally Pad 0) pin and a Rx (any pad) pin on the same UART to control the TMC drivers. You've chosen to use PA12 for the Tx pin, so one option would be to use PA13 for the Rx pin and move STEP_1 to another PA pin. Or you could use PA20 and PA22 for the UART as we do on the tool board.

                          Another constraint is that every pin used as a digital input pin (including the two DIAG inputs from the TMC2209s) should be on a separate EXINT number.

                          You can choose whether to run the SAMC21 at 3.3V or 5V. The TMC2209s must use the same voltage on the VCCIO pin.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          PCRundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • o_lampeundefined
                            o_lampe @pfn
                            last edited by

                            @pfn said in Adding support for the enraged rabbit carrot feeder (ERCF):

                            the kit I got has a less-than-straight D-shaft

                            I studied the build instructions and to me it seems, it's pretty easy to bend the D-shaft during assembly.
                            There are some points were it can go wrong.

                            • Wrong height of the center bearing support
                            • Wrong length of the smooth rod assembly
                            • or just from handling the lower assembly without the top assembly
                            pfnundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • pfnundefined
                              pfn @o_lampe
                              last edited by

                              @o_lampe it's certainly a possibility that this is self inflicted. I already have 3 more rods on the way to help make sure it's less likely I end up with a bent rod if that's the case.

                              o_lampeundefined danzaywerundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • o_lampeundefined
                                o_lampe @pfn
                                last edited by

                                @pfn
                                I didn't want to blame you, but prepare for the new d-shaft.

                                pfnundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • pfnundefined
                                  pfn @pfn
                                  last edited by

                                  new demo video:

                                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4DiK5DVftM

                                  Alex.crundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                  • Alex.crundefined
                                    Alex.cr @pfn
                                    last edited by Alex.cr

                                    @pfn

                                    My tip forming isn't tuned yet, but at the moment it's a 10mm extrusion at 5mm/s, followed by unloading 80mm at 5mm/s; this part is actually really what takes longest

                                    In regard to tip forming, I have been working on tuning this while my kit comes in.
                                    Below is what is working for me in ABS so far if you are interested. I am using a Mosquito and LGX.

                                    ;called to unload filament from the nozzle to support the ERCF
                                    
                                    G1 E4.0 F500 
                                    G1 E-10.0 F1500
                                    G4 S1 
                                    G1 E-10.0 F300
                                    G4 S1
                                    G1 E-20.0 F700
                                    G1 E-60.0 F1000
                                    
                                    

                                    Voron2.4/Duet3 SBC+6HC+3HC+1LC+1HCL(x2) - Delta/Duet2 Wifi - CubePro/Duet2 Wifi+Duex5 - Laser/Duet3 Mini5+ - Cel Robox - U̶p̶3̶0̶0̶+/D̶u̶e̶t̶3̶ ̶6̶H̶C̶+̶LC1̶ - F̶T̶-̶5̶/̶D̶u̶e̶t̶2̶ ̶W̶i̶f̶i̶ - S̶o̶l̶i̶d̶o̶o̶d̶l̶e̶

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • pfnundefined
                                      pfn @o_lampe
                                      last edited by

                                      @o_lampe I think most of the stalling issues are related to poor dimensional accuracy/warping on my abs prints, I have no enclosure, so stuff isn't perfectly accurate.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • pfnundefined
                                        pfn @pfn
                                        last edited by pfn

                                        It prints!

                                        alt text

                                        Still some issues to resolve:
                                        cooling moves performed by superslicer immediately before changing filaments cause RRF to constantly flag that there's a filament-error: "tooLittleMovement" is detected. I don't know how to get around this yet. I'll try to generate a print job that replicates the cooling move and see how this triggers RRF into erroring.

                                        Errors during filament swapping while printing don't necessarily get handled well, M98 R1 doesn't seem to behave exactly as I expect, sometimes my macros appear to continue executing to the end (macroRestarted is false) and silently failing even though my full call stack has M98 R1 set.

                                        Some other tuning needs to be done around final filament parking and documenting how this could be used by more folks.

                                        Alex.crundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                        • PCRundefined
                                          PCR @dc42
                                          last edited by

                                          @dc42

                                          67598415-8c3f-48d7-a511-eb6685370187-grafik.png

                                          Just update the schmematic. 😉 I compeltly forgot about hte RX TX thign honestly. Last time i made a board wtih Stepper UART contoll it was the same mistake

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Alex.crundefined
                                            Alex.cr @pfn
                                            last edited by Alex.cr

                                            @pfn

                                            I just got my ERCF installed and working on tuning now. I am just getting started but most things seem to be working. I am having two issues and curious what your thoughts are.

                                            I am running the following setup, SBC+6HC+3HC+1LC. The ERCF has everything using the 3HC. Extruder on the 1LC. Running 3.4.0beta6 (2021-11-06 11:38:57). I am also using your most recent set of uploads to github as of 3 hours ago.

                                            Here are the two alarms,Untitled picture.png

                                            I am hoping the first one doesn't matter too much and corrects itself based upon when the ERCF extruder is selected. This may or may not be true and may need some rethinking if people do not have the encoder on the same board as their main extruder?

                                            I think the second error seems like an SBC issue? @chrishamm ? Are you running on an SBC or standalone?
                                            Here is the .g file that it references:

                                            echo >{global.ercf_selector_file} "; AUTOGENERATED FILE DO NOT EDIT"
                                            echo >>{global.ercf_selector_file} "set global.ercf_selector_pos = " ^ global.ercf_selector_pos
                                            echo >>{global.ercf_selector_file} "set global.ercf_extruder_loaded = " ^ global.ercf_extruder_loaded
                                            

                                            And a screen shot of the variables:
                                            Untitled picture2.png

                                            Curious what your thoughts are. Thanks for the hard work!

                                            Voron2.4/Duet3 SBC+6HC+3HC+1LC+1HCL(x2) - Delta/Duet2 Wifi - CubePro/Duet2 Wifi+Duex5 - Laser/Duet3 Mini5+ - Cel Robox - U̶p̶3̶0̶0̶+/D̶u̶e̶t̶3̶ ̶6̶H̶C̶+̶LC1̶ - F̶T̶-̶5̶/̶D̶u̶e̶t̶2̶ ̶W̶i̶f̶i̶ - S̶o̶l̶i̶d̶o̶o̶d̶l̶e̶

                                            pfnundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA