Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Issues with PID Tuning (RRF 3.4.0-b7)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Beta Firmware
    6
    24
    1.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Argoundefined
      Argo @Hernicz
      last edited by

      I‘m also having PID issues with my new Rapido Hotend.
      Lowering PWM to 0.5 does help a bit but it still overshoots during a print.

      Herniczundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Herniczundefined
        Hernicz @Argo
        last edited by

        @argo I don't think reducing PWM is the solution.

        There are known knowns and known unknowns, things we know that we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns.

        Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Argoundefined
          Argo @Hernicz
          last edited by Argo

          @hernicz

          Have you tried one of the unofficial beta “+” releases posted here?
          https://github.com/Duet3D/RepRapFirmware/commit/e0e741a76f7183dd94668218b0eb4d3e9d53d014
          There was a commit regarding PID right after the release of beta 7.
          I’ll test it soon and report back.

          Edit: Initial impression with Beta7+7: after new PID calibration hotend temperature stays stable at the target temperature. It initially overshoots a bit but then settles at stays at the temperature.

          0 dc42 committed to Duet3D/RepRapFirmware
          Big fixes to calculation of PID parameters
          Herniczundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Herniczundefined
            Hernicz @Argo
            last edited by Hernicz

            @argo I have beta7+5.

            Not really related but do you know how can I update RRF firmware through bash if all of my software up to date (so RRF firmware update doesn't get triggered).
            I found no info last time when I connected an expansion board, and ended up having to update it through DWC.

            According to bash:
            reprapfirmware is already the newest version (3.4-b7-2).
            While in DWC I have b7+5

            There are known knowns and known unknowns, things we know that we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns.

            Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Argoundefined
              Argo @Hernicz
              last edited by Argo

              @hernicz

              Sorry can't help you with that. I'm using my Duet boards in standalone board and I'm glad I don't need a Pi or something because else I could use Klipper tbh ^^

              aaaand PID still does not work during a print (RRF 3.4.0-b7+7):

              080b9442-290f-46dd-97cc-6b8c81164fbd-image.png 96fb7e24-fc1b-4692-afa6-d8f882a01b99-image.png

              gloomyandyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • gloomyandyundefined
                gloomyandy @Argo
                last edited by

                @argo I think it would help if you explain what is wrong with your pid control and what the two graphs you have posted are showing.

                Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Argoundefined
                  Argo @gloomyandy
                  last edited by

                  @gloomyandy

                  Well, the graph is not flat and jumping around. The extruder temp is set to 210°C and the graph on the right shows that it is jumping around. Sometimes it almost hits 220°C.

                  I did PID calibration for T0 and it gives me this gcode to use:
                  M307 H1 R5.035 K0.663:0.153 D4.06 E1.35 S1.00 B0 V24.4

                  Gixxerfastundefined gloomyandyundefined Herniczundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Gixxerfastundefined
                    Gixxerfast @Argo
                    last edited by Gixxerfast

                    @argo @Hernicz

                    I just retuned my hotend heater which has a copper block with a 50w heater.

                    2022-01-15 17:28:08	m115
                    FIRMWARE_NAME: RepRapFirmware for Duet 3 Mini 5+ FIRMWARE_VERSION: 3.4.0beta7+7 ELECTRONICS: Duet 3 Mini5plus WiFi FIRMWARE_DATE: 2022-01-14 08:58:34
                    
                    2022-01-15 17:10:37	M303 H1 S250
                    Auto tuning heater 1 using target temperature 250.0°C and PWM 1.00 - do not leave printer unattended
                    

                    The result was this:

                    M307 H0 R0.620 K0.495:0.000 D0.91 E1.35 S1.00 B0
                    

                    and my temp regulation seems to work pretty good:
                    e5449a73-4d14-48d2-ae0a-32bad7ac9577-image.png

                    I suggest you show what commnd you use for pid calibration (heater tuning) and an M115 and M122.

                    Are you sure your PSU is not on the limit or you have some voltage drop somewhere? (I'm not an electrical engineer 🙂 )

                    I'm going to start a print soon just to verify that it can respond correctly during the print.

                    Voron V2.4 (#1317) with Duet 3 Mini5+ Wifi and 1LC v1.1 Toolboard
                    Voron V0.1 (#637) with Duet 3 Mini 5+ Wifi and 1LC v1.2 Toolboard
                    Ender 3 Pro with BTT SKR-2 + RRF

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • gloomyandyundefined
                      gloomyandy @Argo
                      last edited by

                      @argo Was it any different on other versions of RRF with the same hotend? I'm trying to help separate out any possible regression in this beta release from a possibly general problem with supporting your type of hotend with RRF.

                      If the same hotend worked better on a previous release, then please ignore the rest of this post. If it didn't then maybe the following will help....

                      What does the graph look like if you are not printing (just set the hotend to a fixed temperature), is it more stable then?

                      What happened at 15:55 on the first graph? Did anything (like the cooling fan level) change at that point? There seems to be a particularly large change in temperature at that point.

                      There seems to be a relatively large difference between the fan on and fan off values for the K parameter. Does the Rapido Hotend have any sort of "sock" on it? I wonder if the cooling fan is blowing back from the print surface and causing problems?

                      Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Herniczundefined
                        Hernicz @Argo
                        last edited by

                        @argo It climbs up temp because of the secound K value

                        M307 H1 R5.035 K0.663:0.153 D4.06 E1.35 S1.00 B0 V24.4

                        Thats for fan compensation

                        There are known knowns and known unknowns, things we know that we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Argoundefined
                          Argo @gloomyandy
                          last edited by

                          @gloomyandy

                          I changed the hotend while running RRF 3.4b7 (official b7 from github) so can't tell yet if it works well with 3.3 stable.

                          The Rapido Hotend comes with a full silicone sock and only a small tip of the nozzle is visible and can be targeted by the parts cooling fan.
                          The fan speed changes from 85% to 100% during a print. Before that I had a Mosquito Magnum which did not have any sock and did not have issues with temperatures (also 3.4b7).

                          I just flashed 3.3 stable to compare the results and did PID tuning:

                          M307 H1 B0 R4.821 C119.7:101.0 D4.26 S1.00 V24.4

                          And here is the graph whilst printing with 3.3 stable:

                          798139a1-ea4c-4aec-ae6b-f81418e85d52-image.png

                          Target temp is again 210°C and it keeps jumping between 209.3 - 210.5°C.
                          It's not perfect but far better than with 3.4b7 but still it struggles to hold the temperature whilst printing with that kind of heater. When idling and without the parts cooling fan running the temperature stays perfectly at 210°C.

                          Next I'll try the classic heater PID without the fan included.

                          gloomyandyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • gloomyandyundefined
                            gloomyandy @Argo
                            last edited by

                            @argo Well it certainly seems to be much better with 3.3. I wonder if @dc42 has any thoughts on what might be happening here?

                            It would certainly be interesting to see how well both 3.3 and 3.4beta7 work with just a single K value.

                            Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Argoundefined
                              Argo @gloomyandy
                              last edited by

                              @gloomyandy

                              Just did a new PID (still RRF 3.3) as a H(eater) and not T(ool) so there is no calibration with the fan included.

                              M307 H1 B0 R4.676 C121.5 D4.48 S1.00 V24.3

                              And the temperature is pretty stable during a print:

                              18605ec5-d009-4eb6-9aeb-c8648c92a803-image.png

                              Should make no difference with RRF 3.4.0-b7 but I'll also test the PID as a heater and not tool.

                              massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • massimilianocontiundefined
                                massimilianoconti @Argo
                                last edited by massimilianoconti

                                try firmware 3.4 beta 7+7

                                https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i5vox3xmkd55gaz/AAC19mI0WEC5GmEjLOBRbKs-a?dl=0

                                if you still have problems I help you in another way

                                Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Argoundefined
                                  Argo @massimilianoconti
                                  last edited by

                                  @massimilianoconti

                                  3.4 beta7+7 - the results were even worse with PID

                                  massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • bastienundefined
                                    bastien
                                    last edited by

                                    This post is deleted!
                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • massimilianocontiundefined
                                      massimilianoconti @Argo
                                      last edited by

                                      then for the bed try to give this code in duet web control

                                      M303 H0 S80 Y3

                                      Y3= 3 hysteresis cycles

                                      Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Argoundefined
                                        Argo @massimilianoconti
                                        last edited by

                                        @massimilianoconti

                                        I have no PID issues with the bed.

                                        The extruder PID calibration does not work for me when the parts cooling fan is included. Therefore I need to start the PID calibration as a heater and not as a tool.

                                        The Rapido uses a different kind of heater which needs less power at higher temperatures. Maybe that is causing trouble for the PID calibration.

                                        massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • massimilianocontiundefined
                                          massimilianoconti @Argo
                                          last edited by

                                          ok try this code to calibrate as a tool M303 T0 S205 Y3

                                          Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Phaedruxundefined Phaedrux moved this topic from General Discussion
                                          • Argoundefined
                                            Argo @massimilianoconti
                                            last edited by

                                            @massimilianoconti

                                            Y3 or Y5 produce the same PID results which cause issues. Only solution I have atm is to use the old PID calibration which does not include the fan.

                                            massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA