Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Issues with PID Tuning (RRF 3.4.0-b7)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Beta Firmware
    6
    24
    1.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Gixxerfastundefined
      Gixxerfast @Argo
      last edited by Gixxerfast

      @argo @Hernicz

      I just retuned my hotend heater which has a copper block with a 50w heater.

      2022-01-15 17:28:08	m115
      FIRMWARE_NAME: RepRapFirmware for Duet 3 Mini 5+ FIRMWARE_VERSION: 3.4.0beta7+7 ELECTRONICS: Duet 3 Mini5plus WiFi FIRMWARE_DATE: 2022-01-14 08:58:34
      
      2022-01-15 17:10:37	M303 H1 S250
      Auto tuning heater 1 using target temperature 250.0°C and PWM 1.00 - do not leave printer unattended
      

      The result was this:

      M307 H0 R0.620 K0.495:0.000 D0.91 E1.35 S1.00 B0
      

      and my temp regulation seems to work pretty good:
      e5449a73-4d14-48d2-ae0a-32bad7ac9577-image.png

      I suggest you show what commnd you use for pid calibration (heater tuning) and an M115 and M122.

      Are you sure your PSU is not on the limit or you have some voltage drop somewhere? (I'm not an electrical engineer 🙂 )

      I'm going to start a print soon just to verify that it can respond correctly during the print.

      Voron V2.4 (#1317) with Duet 3 Mini5+ Wifi and 1LC v1.1 Toolboard
      Voron V0.1 (#637) with Duet 3 Mini 5+ Wifi and 1LC v1.2 Toolboard
      Ender 3 Pro with BTT SKR-2 + RRF

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • gloomyandyundefined
        gloomyandy @Argo
        last edited by

        @argo Was it any different on other versions of RRF with the same hotend? I'm trying to help separate out any possible regression in this beta release from a possibly general problem with supporting your type of hotend with RRF.

        If the same hotend worked better on a previous release, then please ignore the rest of this post. If it didn't then maybe the following will help....

        What does the graph look like if you are not printing (just set the hotend to a fixed temperature), is it more stable then?

        What happened at 15:55 on the first graph? Did anything (like the cooling fan level) change at that point? There seems to be a particularly large change in temperature at that point.

        There seems to be a relatively large difference between the fan on and fan off values for the K parameter. Does the Rapido Hotend have any sort of "sock" on it? I wonder if the cooling fan is blowing back from the print surface and causing problems?

        Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Herniczundefined
          Hernicz @Argo
          last edited by

          @argo It climbs up temp because of the secound K value

          M307 H1 R5.035 K0.663:0.153 D4.06 E1.35 S1.00 B0 V24.4

          Thats for fan compensation

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Argoundefined
            Argo @gloomyandy
            last edited by

            @gloomyandy

            I changed the hotend while running RRF 3.4b7 (official b7 from github) so can't tell yet if it works well with 3.3 stable.

            The Rapido Hotend comes with a full silicone sock and only a small tip of the nozzle is visible and can be targeted by the parts cooling fan.
            The fan speed changes from 85% to 100% during a print. Before that I had a Mosquito Magnum which did not have any sock and did not have issues with temperatures (also 3.4b7).

            I just flashed 3.3 stable to compare the results and did PID tuning:

            M307 H1 B0 R4.821 C119.7:101.0 D4.26 S1.00 V24.4

            And here is the graph whilst printing with 3.3 stable:

            798139a1-ea4c-4aec-ae6b-f81418e85d52-image.png

            Target temp is again 210°C and it keeps jumping between 209.3 - 210.5°C.
            It's not perfect but far better than with 3.4b7 but still it struggles to hold the temperature whilst printing with that kind of heater. When idling and without the parts cooling fan running the temperature stays perfectly at 210°C.

            Next I'll try the classic heater PID without the fan included.

            gloomyandyundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • gloomyandyundefined
              gloomyandy @Argo
              last edited by

              @argo Well it certainly seems to be much better with 3.3. I wonder if @dc42 has any thoughts on what might be happening here?

              It would certainly be interesting to see how well both 3.3 and 3.4beta7 work with just a single K value.

              Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Argoundefined
                Argo @gloomyandy
                last edited by

                @gloomyandy

                Just did a new PID (still RRF 3.3) as a H(eater) and not T(ool) so there is no calibration with the fan included.

                M307 H1 B0 R4.676 C121.5 D4.48 S1.00 V24.3

                And the temperature is pretty stable during a print:

                18605ec5-d009-4eb6-9aeb-c8648c92a803-image.png

                Should make no difference with RRF 3.4.0-b7 but I'll also test the PID as a heater and not tool.

                massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • massimilianocontiundefined
                  massimilianoconti @Argo
                  last edited by massimilianoconti

                  try firmware 3.4 beta 7+7

                  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i5vox3xmkd55gaz/AAC19mI0WEC5GmEjLOBRbKs-a?dl=0

                  if you still have problems I help you in another way

                  Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Argoundefined
                    Argo @massimilianoconti
                    last edited by

                    @massimilianoconti

                    3.4 beta7+7 - the results were even worse with PID

                    massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • bastienundefined
                      bastien
                      last edited by

                      This post is deleted!
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • massimilianocontiundefined
                        massimilianoconti @Argo
                        last edited by

                        then for the bed try to give this code in duet web control

                        M303 H0 S80 Y3

                        Y3= 3 hysteresis cycles

                        Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Argoundefined
                          Argo @massimilianoconti
                          last edited by

                          @massimilianoconti

                          I have no PID issues with the bed.

                          The extruder PID calibration does not work for me when the parts cooling fan is included. Therefore I need to start the PID calibration as a heater and not as a tool.

                          The Rapido uses a different kind of heater which needs less power at higher temperatures. Maybe that is causing trouble for the PID calibration.

                          massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • massimilianocontiundefined
                            massimilianoconti @Argo
                            last edited by

                            ok try this code to calibrate as a tool M303 T0 S205 Y3

                            Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Phaedruxundefined Phaedrux moved this topic from General Discussion
                            • Argoundefined
                              Argo @massimilianoconti
                              last edited by

                              @massimilianoconti

                              Y3 or Y5 produce the same PID results which cause issues. Only solution I have atm is to use the old PID calibration which does not include the fan.

                              massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • massimilianocontiundefined
                                massimilianoconti @Argo
                                last edited by massimilianoconti

                                then try to change these parameters:

                                I put my values try to use suitable values for you. you can find in config-override.g

                                try for example starting from your values to lower R and increase D

                                M307 H1 R2.762 D6.75

                                then put the string in duet web controll and press enter

                                digit M500 and press enter

                                make sure you have M501 at the end of config.g

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Herniczundefined
                                  Hernicz
                                  last edited by

                                  This post is deleted!
                                  massimilianocontiundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • massimilianocontiundefined
                                    massimilianoconti @Hernicz
                                    last edited by

                                    ok the geometry and type of material affect the pid adjustment

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • droftartsundefined droftarts referenced this topic
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA