Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Torque Calculation as Percentage of Rated Current

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    3
    13
    963
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ctilley79undefined
      ctilley79
      last edited by

      I didn't really find a solid answer when searching. Is there a way to calculate torque at a given current? If I have a 2 amp motor with a torque rating of 53Ncm, what's the torque if I'm running at 60% of max rated current? Is there a formula for that?

      alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • alankilianundefined
        alankilian @ctilley79
        last edited by

        @ctilley79 If you're talking about zero-speed holding torque then it's linearish so 60% rated current gets you 60% rated torque.

        Most torque curves are related to speed-vs-torque and that's not linear at all.

        Does the speed vs torque curve move linearly up and down as percentage maximum current changes? I'm not sure 100% but I think it does for reasonable fractions of maximum current.

        SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

        ctilley79undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ctilley79undefined
          ctilley79 @alankilian
          last edited by

          @alankilian Gotcha. I'm trying to find the best balance between current and torque. Lower current allow me to achieve faster speeds before back emf becomes the limiting factor. Too low then there's not enough available torque so acceleration has to be drastically reduced or I get layer shifts.

          So I'm trying to find a method where I can determine the best balance between torque and speed.

          alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • alankilianundefined
            alankilian @ctilley79
            last edited by alankilian

            @ctilley79 said in Torque Calculation as Percentage of Rated Current:

            Lower current allow me to achieve faster speeds before back emf becomes the limiting factor.

            Lowering the current is going to LOWER your torque, so I'm confused.

            You should also look at the torque-vs-speed curve for your motor.

            I think that's going to have a much greater influence on your maximum speed than back EMF. (Unless you have a low-voltage power supply.)

            SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

            ctilley79undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ctilley79undefined
              ctilley79 @alankilian
              last edited by ctilley79

              @alankilian said in Torque Calculation as Percentage of Rated Current:

              Lowering the current is going to LOWER your torque, so I'm confused.

              Exactly. lowering current will lower torque, but you get less back emf, so you can achieve higher speeds. However as you lower current, torque can drop to a point where you don't have enough power for fast acceleration moves. Here's output from Duets EMF calculator that shows what I'm talking about. Hence why I'm trying to find a reasonable tradeoff of both.

              At 800ma current

              48e00327-0325-49f1-8740-63aada6da8ac-image.png

              At 1400ma current
              f656631c-06b7-42f5-b572-a66e8c03fc9a-image.png

              alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • alankilianundefined
                alankilian @ctilley79
                last edited by

                @ctilley79 Yes, that's the back EMF calculator, but what about the speed-vs-torque curve of the motor? I'm interested in knowing if there's a calculator that takes into account this curve also or if they all ignore it.

                Here's one that says at 32,000 (16x) steps-per-second, you'll get only 65% of the maximum torque out of your motor.

                Are you factoring in that curve also?

                Capture.PNG

                SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dc42undefined
                  dc42 administrators @alankilian
                  last edited by

                  @alankilian a torque vs. speed curve is generally meaningless without the driver supply voltage being specified, because the ability of the driver to supply the requested current depends on the speed and supply voltage.

                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                  alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • alankilianundefined
                    alankilian @dc42
                    last edited by alankilian

                    @dc42 Sure that's true and important, but also see in the curve I posted that the torque drops even when the drivers are supplying the appropriate amount of current, so I think it's not the drivers, but rather the physics of the motor that cause the drop in torque IN THIS SITUATION..

                    So they BOTH matter, and if you've got a driver that can supply the required current at the speed you are moving, the torque-vs-speed curve is the ONLY one that matters.

                    So I agree and don't agree. 🙂

                    SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                    dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dc42undefined
                      dc42 administrators @alankilian
                      last edited by dc42

                      @alankilian said in Torque Calculation as Percentage of Rated Current:

                      Sure that's true and important, but also see in the curve I posted that the torque drops even when the drivers are supplying the appropriate amount of current, so I think it's not the drivers, but rather the physics of the motor that cause the drop in torque IN THIS SITUATION..

                      That's not entirely clear, because the graph shows only the driver input current, not the output current. If the motor is being loaded with the indicated torque, then the fact that the driver input current remains steady indicates that the output current is not remaining constant.

                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                      alankilianundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • alankilianundefined
                        alankilian @dc42
                        last edited by alankilian

                        @dc42 Hmmmmm.

                        If speed didn't matter, why do they all produce a chart like this?
                        This is the inductance-caused reduction in torque and you are talking about the voltage-caused reduction in torque (I think)

                        Maybe you're saying this chart represents the back-EMF-induced reduction in torque?

                        SeemeCNC Rostock Max V3 converted to V3.2 with a Duet2 Ethernet Firmware 3.2 and SE300

                        dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators @alankilian
                          last edited by

                          @alankilian said in Torque Calculation as Percentage of Rated Current:

                          This is the inductance-caused reduction in torque and you are talking about the voltage-caused reduction in torque (I think)

                          They are almost the same thing. Inductance causes back emf, and that back emf is proportional to the full step rate and the motor current. Motion also causes back emf, and that back emf is also proportional to step rate (but not to motor current). If the driver supply voltage is insufficient to overcome the combined back emf, then the current must drop.

                          A complication is that when the motor is lightly loaded and the lag angle is low, the two sources of back emf are in phase; but when the load is high and the motor is on the point of skipping steps, they are 90deg out of phase.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          ctilley79undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • ctilley79undefined
                            ctilley79 @dc42
                            last edited by

                            @dc42 So back to the topic at hand. What's a good way to set current to achieve the highest speeds without losing running torque?

                            dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dc42undefined
                              dc42 administrators @ctilley79
                              last edited by

                              At speeds above the point of torque dropoff due to insufficient voltage, the current setting doesn't make any difference. Higher current will give more torque at lower speeds, but the point at which torque starts reducing and the motor becomes noisy will be reached at a lower speed.

                              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA