DUEX 5 V0.8 TO DUEX 5 V0.11

[paolozampini1973]

@dc42 I want to thank you for all the attention you gave me even if you didn't even spend 10 seconds on more important things.

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts please when you have some time we can clarify there is a software problem or a hardware problem At least this otherwise I want to return it honestly it only created problems for you too I tried to contact @ dc42 several times but I have not received no reply I don't know why thank you you are very kind

[paolozampini1973]

@engikeneer I WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR THE DEDICATED TIME

[paolozampini1973]

@dc42 so it is the confirmation that you are not interested in the problems of version 0.11 because you have not paid attention you have serious problems that v 0.11 has good

[paolozampini1973]

Hello everyone So I'll explain the problem of the card The problem is that the card is that the drivers are not correctly disconnected This is why it gives the error and whoever designed it does not seem to care about the very serious design problem v0 11 would be to remove it from the market from the sale it goes complements magazine and from how I have seen no one has been able to give an answer because it gives short circuit errors But I must admit that giving solutions to get around the problem are all good but the real solution I have not seen this great skill Today I take apart the card and throw it away because for me personally it has created serious problems and I see that whoever designed it is a big manager if he was a responsible person he would have questioned us he would have talked about it would have understood he would have made himself heard anyway I want to thank those people who gave you a less decent answer but those people who try to get around the problem don't work that way guys get around the problem doesn't work Go you have to solve the problem you have to understand where the problem is I'm used to it so for many maybe they do it as a pastime as a game.

[droftarts]

@paolozampini1973 I have some time this afternoon to help you. However, I need you to answer my questions, test things as I ask you to, and please no long arguments and saying again and again "there's a problem!". If I can get the information I need, we can work out where the problem is. Okay?

Ian

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts yes yes Thank you for your time with me

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts So what I would like to ask you I want to reassemble the v 0.8 and solve the problems with the v0.8 version because I repeat the only problem that I had a small loss of step and that's it I didn't have any kind of problem except to make some very small optimizations the rest worked everything is fine for you if you start reassembling v0.8 ?

[droftarts]

@paolozampini1973 I'd like to work out if there is a hardware problem with your V0.11 board. If there is, it can be replaced or refunded. Disabling the drivers through hardware on the V0.11 board is a better way of controlling the external drivers, which you can not do on the V0.8 board.

Ian

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts Yes it's fine ok I was saying for you because I didn't want to take advantage of your time for me it's fine thanks

[droftarts]

@droftarts Questions:

1. In DueX2 mode, you said that the external drivers (X and Y) move correctly (except for the original problem of skipping), but you cannot move the extruders on driver 5 and driver 6. Correct?
2. In DueX2 mode, can you move the Z2 motor on driver 9? Is it connected to an external driver as well?
3. Is there any reason you cannot connect Z2 motor to driver 0 or 1 on the Duet 2 WiFi board?
4. Please post a good picture of how your DueX v0.11 board is set up.
5. What is the exact specification of the thermistors that you have for your tools and bed? Make, model or link would be useful.

Try to keep your answers short and accurate!

Ian

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts my printer configuration:
Z is configured with two INDEPENDENT motors FOR SELF-LEVELING one on Driver 1 = Z one on the driver 9 = Z then X = DRIVER 7 EXSTERNAL DM860H Y = DRIVER 8 EXSTERNAL DM860H then I have 4 driver instructors 3 TMC2660 + driver 4 TMC2660 + driver 5 TMC2660 + driver 6 TMC2660
PROBLEMS WITH DUEX5 V0.11 IN DUEX5 OFF DRIVE MODE 7 AXIS X + DRIVER 8 AXIS Y WHY I NEED TO USE IT

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts I have sent you my configuration I hope it is clear that I was able to explain if there is something that I have not been clear Please tell me thanks

[droftarts]

@paolozampini1973 Please answer the questions. I can't help you if you don't answer the questions.

Ian

[droftarts]

@paolozampini1973 said in DUEX 5 V0.8 TO DUEX 5 V0.11:

Z is configured with two INDEPENDENT motors FOR SELF-LEVELING one on Driver 1 = Z one on the driver 9 = Z

This is incorrect. Your config.g shows the first Z motor on driver 2.

M584 X7 Y8 Z2:9 E3:4:5:6 S0

Ian

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts
driver 2 = z1 driver 9 z2 axis must be separated for self-leveling

drive3 =E0 EXTRUDER drive 4=E1 EXTRUDER drive5 =E2 EXTRUDER drive 6=E4 EXTRUDER
X = DRIVER 7 EXSTERNAL DM860H
Y = DRIVER 8 EXSTERNAL DM860H

[droftarts]

@paolozampini1973 said in DUEX 5 V0.8 TO DUEX 5 V0.11:

driver 2 = z1 driver 9 z2 axis must be separated for self-leveling

Yes, but the second Z motor can be on ANY other driver. I want you to move it to driver 0 (X on Duet 2) or driver 1 (Y on Duet 2).

Then the bed can move with the DueX in DueX2 mode, because the on board drivers 7, 8 and 9 are disabled in DueX2 mode.

Ian

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts Excuse me for my question but I have 4 extruders I do not know if I have explained myself Forgive me if I do not understand be patient but I have 4 extruders

[paolozampini1973]

@droftarts Please be patient that I send you a photo of my printer that I built

[paolozampini1973]

This post is deleted!