Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    I'm not saying it's not my fault...

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    General Discussion
    7
    24
    983
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Nightowlundefined
      Nightowl @mikeabuilder
      last edited by Nightowl

      @mikeabuilder I might have to run it again after all, so I'll keep an eye our for that, thanks.

      I'm not sure about wire-wiggling, but I'm going to change the existing cable to four-core shielded cable over the next couple of days 👍

      Few things are more dangerous than taking the advice of someone who thinks he knows what he's doing.
      I'm still on my learning curve, so take everything I say with caution!

      RatRig 1075, Duet3 MB6HC, Sorotec SFM 1000 PV-ER milling motor, Hobbyist

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Nightowlundefined
        Nightowl @fcwilt
        last edited by

        @fcwilt
        OK, I get that. Hopefully the shielded cable (the shield would be earthed) will resolve that, but would a NC button be better? These switches have both options, so I could change it, if NC is the better choice?

        Few things are more dangerous than taking the advice of someone who thinks he knows what he's doing.
        I'm still on my learning curve, so take everything I say with caution!

        RatRig 1075, Duet3 MB6HC, Sorotec SFM 1000 PV-ER milling motor, Hobbyist

        fcwiltundefined JoergS5undefined deckingmanundefined 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • fcwiltundefined
          fcwilt @Nightowl
          last edited by

          @nightowl999 said in I'm not saying it's not my fault...:

          @fcwilt
          OK, I get that. Hopefully the shielded cable (the shield would be earthed) will resolve that, but would a NC button be better? These switches have both options, so I could change it, if NC is the better choice?

          NC first choice always.

          Shielded cable never hurts.

          As I recall you have the one button and had a bit of trouble getting the code to work.

          Two buttons is always better. No issues with hitting the button more than once. Pause is pause. Resume is resume.

          Frederick

          Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • JoergS5undefined
            JoergS5 @Nightowl
            last edited by

            @nightowl999 with an NC, a disturbance or interference does nothing (it's already closed). With NO, it triggers. So NC is preferrable.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • deckingmanundefined
              deckingman @Nightowl
              last edited by

              @nightowl999 To elaborate on what others have already said, if you have a normally open switch and a wire falls off, it will never trigger. So when you try to home, the carriage will not stop bit will crash into the frame. If you have a normally closed switch, and a wire falls off, then it'll trigger at the start of a homing move so won't crash into the frame. However, if you don't happen to notice, the machine will have a false homing and will "think" it's at one edge of the gantry travel, when in fact it could be in the centre. So if you start a job like that, the head will likely crash into the frame at the end furthest from the homing position. To mitigate that, I always check the status of the homing switch as the very first command in my homing files, and if the switch is already triggered then homing is aborted and a message displayed as to the reason.

              Ian
              https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
              https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

              fcwiltundefined Nightowlundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • fcwiltundefined
                fcwilt @deckingman
                last edited by

                @deckingman said in I'm not saying it's not my fault...:

                To mitigate that, I always check the status of the homing switch as the very first command in my homing files, and if the switch is already triggered then homing is aborted and a message displayed as to the reason.

                That is something I never thought of, that it could indicate a hardware failure.

                I've always treated that as an indication that the gantry just happens to sitting at the end of the axis and is triggering the endstop sensor.

                Your approach is certainly safe but what do you do then? Jog the gantry away from the endstop sensor?

                I need to change my code to deal with the possibility that it could be a hardware failure.

                Thanks.

                Frederick

                Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                deckingmanundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Nightowlundefined
                  Nightowl @deckingman
                  last edited by

                  Thanks, @deckingman

                  I too will need to look at my homing macros to incorporate a status check, so I’d be interested to see how you’ve done it.

                  Other comments regarding the NC switch make sense, because that’s why I changed to nc proximity sensors on the X, Y and Z axes, rather than mechanical no switches!

                  Thanks, everyone!

                  Few things are more dangerous than taking the advice of someone who thinks he knows what he's doing.
                  I'm still on my learning curve, so take everything I say with caution!

                  RatRig 1075, Duet3 MB6HC, Sorotec SFM 1000 PV-ER milling motor, Hobbyist

                  deckingmanundefined fcwiltundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • deckingmanundefined
                    deckingman @fcwilt
                    last edited by

                    @fcwilt said in [I'm not saying it's not my fault...](/post/285096

                    Your approach is certainly safe but what do you do then? Jog the gantry away from the endstop sensor?

                    Yes that's the first thing to do although it's very unlikely that my machine would be left in a position where one or more axes was hard up against an end stop. The only times it has saved me have been a genuine fault, usually related to my use of a nozzle as a probe and the associated kinematic mount which used to be a bit temperamental.

                    Ian
                    https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                    https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • deckingmanundefined
                      deckingman @Nightowl
                      last edited by

                      @nightowl999 said in I'm not saying it's not my fault...:

                      Thanks, @deckingman

                      I too will need to look at my homing macros to incorporate a status check, so I’d be interested to see how you’ve done it.

                      I'm away from home right now and only have my phone to hand so I can't give you the exact code. But it's in the form of "if axis(n) is homed - show message and abort". You'll have to look up conditional gcode. If you remind me in about a week, I'll post the exact code.

                      Ian
                      https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                      https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • fcwiltundefined
                        fcwilt @Nightowl
                        last edited by

                        @nightowl999 said in I'm not saying it's not my fault...:

                        so I’d be interested to see how you’ve done it.

                        Here is a stripped down version of one of my homing routines.

                        If the endstop is triggered at the start of the move I first backoff a bit to see if it clears.

                        Most of the time this won't cause any problems unless the endstop was stuck on and there was no room to backoff because of the current axis position.

                        If that is of concern to you, simply remove the code the does the check and the backoff.

                        You will notice the code at the end that talks about moving to the centerline. That is because my endstops rarely are at the exact min or max position of the axis. A G1 H1 move sets the logical axis position to the axis min or max setting (depending on where the endstop is located) but that doesn't mean the axis is actually at the position. Since I always configure my printers to have X=0 Y=0 at the center of the bed, by testing I determine how far I have to move the axis, after the G1 H1 moves complete, to reach the centerline. Once I know that number it goes into the homing code followed by the G92 which then sets the logical position to 0.

                        ; === homeY.g BOF ===
                        
                        ; --- setup to home Y ---
                        
                        var msg = ""
                        
                        M291 R"Homing Y" P"Please wait..." T0
                        
                        ; --- check Y endstop state ---
                        
                        if sensors.endstops[1].triggered
                          G91                       ; relative movements
                          G1 H2 Y-35 F3000          ; if triggered backoff so both G1 H1 moves below will be performed
                        
                        ; --- check endstop state again to be sure it cleared ---
                        
                        if sensors.endstops[1].triggered
                          set var.msg = "homeY: Cannot home - the endstop seems to be stuck on"
                          
                          M291 R{var.msg} P"Aborting" S2
                          abort var.msg
                          
                        ; --- home Y ---
                        
                        G91                         ; relative movements
                        G1 H1 Y299 F3000            ; fast move to endstop
                        G1 Y-10                     ; backoff a bit as needed to clear endstop
                        G1 H1 Y15  F300             ; slow move to endstop
                        
                        ; --- finish up ---
                        
                        G91                         ; relative movements
                        G1 Y-117 F3000              ; move as needed to get to Y centerline of bed
                        G92 Y0                      ; sync logical and physical
                        
                        M291 R"Y Homed" P"Done" T1

                        Printers: a E3D MS/TC setup and a RatRig Hybrid. Using Duet 3 hardware running 3.4.6

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA