Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    Software bundle 3.5.0-beta.3 now available

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Beta Firmware
    11
    28
    2.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • CCS86undefined
      CCS86 @Argo
      last edited by

      @Argo

      That doesn't mean it is the correct approach.

      Flow has a very direct relationship to under/over extrusion and much less effect on part size. So, tuning flow to adjust part size and causing under/over extrusion should be no surprise.

      Tuning XY steps or shrinkage/scale in your slicer has a perfectly direct relationship on part size and no effect on extrusion accuracy.

      So, first get your flow tuned right.

      Second, get your parts printing geometrically accurately.

      Third, tune your CAD clearance/allowance for the fit you want.

      Argoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Argoundefined
        Argo @CCS86
        last edited by

        @CCS86

        Thanks but Flow is tuned right but it won’t work this this beta release. Flashing to previous build or Klipper and the problem is gone.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • lparnell34undefined
          lparnell34 @dc42
          last edited by

          @dc42 Is there a scanning z probe that you have tried or could recommend?

          dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dc42undefined
            dc42 administrators @lparnell34
            last edited by

            @lparnell34 I am looking at two scanning Z probe solutions. One is a version of our IR sensor, with modified firmware to produce an output related to the height of the sensor above the bed plate. This may work if we can find a suitable consistent surface to use with the sensor. Some of the modern flex plates may be suitable. The second is a small inductive sensor add-on to our tool board.

            Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
            Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
            http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

            tecnoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • tecnoundefined
              tecno @dc42
              last edited by

              @dc42 said in Software bundle 3.5.0-beta.3 now available:

              The second is a small inductive sensor add-on to our tool board.

              This sounds very good in my ears as I can not get Smart Effector to work properly.
              Been planing to do this on my Big Delta.

              dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dc42undefined
                dc42 administrators @tecno
                last edited by

                @tecno said in Software bundle 3.5.0-beta.3 now available:

                This sounds very good in my ears as I can not get Smart Effector to work properly.

                Which version Smart Effector do you have, and what is the problem you are having?

                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                tecnoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • tecnoundefined
                  tecno @dc42
                  last edited by

                  @dc42

                  It is 3.0
                  Not same sensitivity on print area that is approx 450mm in diameter = No reliable mesh.

                  DSC_0187.JPG

                  Also I suspect the mounting of the extruder /adapter may cause issues as well.

                  dc42undefined weed2allundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • dc42undefined
                    dc42 administrators @tecno
                    last edited by

                    @tecno if the extruder is clamped tightly to the effector, that may affect the sensitivity. Can you try adding 3 nylon washers between the printed part and the effector, and 3 nylon washers under the nuts or screw heads on the underside too?

                    Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                    Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                    http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                    tecnoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • tecnoundefined
                      tecno @dc42
                      last edited by

                      @dc42

                      I will try that.

                      Question: best way how to connect this inductive sensor to Effector or directly to Mini5+?

                      DSC_0005 (1).JPG

                      This if I can not get Effctor sensityvity to act as it should.

                      dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • weed2allundefined
                        weed2all @tecno
                        last edited by weed2all

                        @tecno said in Software bundle 3.5.0-beta.3 now available:

                        @dc42

                        It is 3.0
                        Not same sensitivity on print area that is approx 450mm in diameter = No reliable mesh.

                        DSC_0187.JPG

                        Also I suspect the mounting of the extruder /adapter may cause issues as well.

                        i remember when i designed the mount for lgx lite for my smart effector the first 3 iterrations of the mount was just like that and never had a good probe because the mount interfere with the strain gauge of the effector...and then i decided to raise it a bit and that sorted out...this is how it looks righ now photo_2023-05-05_17-30-39.jpg

                        i added some spacers to the mount to raise it from the smart effector then i integrate them on the final deignphoto_2023-05-05_17-34-58.jpg

                        https://www.thingiverse.com/weed2all/designs

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • dc42undefined
                          dc42 administrators @tecno
                          last edited by

                          @tecno my first advice is: always choose a NPN sensor, not a PNP sensor.

                          You can connect a PNP sensor to either the Duet or the tool board using two resistors. See the wiki page on connecting a Z probe.

                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                          tecnoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • tecnoundefined
                            tecno @dc42
                            last edited by

                            @dc42

                            In 2-wire mode NPN or PNP for this sensor

                            dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • dc42undefined
                              dc42 administrators @tecno
                              last edited by dc42

                              @tecno you would need to use a pullup resistor between the output and voltage source of 10V or more to use it in NPN mode. The resistor would have to be chosen so that the 0.9mA leakage didn't trigger the Duet, but when triggered the load was at least 4mA. For example, a 3K or lower resistor to +12V, or a 6K or lower resistor to +24V. If you go this route, do the sums to ensure that the resistor can dissipate the required power. There will almost certainly be a voltage drop when triggered, and this may be too much for the Duet to recognise it as triggered.

                              Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                              Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                              http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                              tecnoundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • tecnoundefined
                                tecno @dc42
                                last edited by

                                @dc42
                                In 3 wire mode yes

                                But how about 2-wire mode?

                                dc42undefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • dc42undefined
                                  dc42 administrators @tecno
                                  last edited by

                                  @tecno as I indicated in my previous response, to use 2-wire mode you would need to add a pullup resistor to +10V or greater to meet the minimum voltage and current requirements, and even then it might not work because the voltage drop when triggered in 2-wire mode has not been specified.

                                  Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                  Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                  http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA