Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    CanBus model for octopus pro f429

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    STM
    3
    8
    216
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • RodrigoRMaraujoundefined
      RodrigoRMaraujo
      last edited by RodrigoRMaraujo

      Hello everyone.

      Is there a model of canbus board that is more suitable to work with MTB Octopus Pro F429?

      jay_s_ukundefined 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jay_s_ukundefined
        jay_s_uk @RodrigoRMaraujo
        last edited by

        @RodrigoRMaraujo https://teamgloomy.github.io/btt_octopus_pro_1.0_f429_spi2canfd_3_5.html
        You can add CAN-FD as described here. However it's been suggested to use the EFD version and use the SPI on J74.
        Then you can use any toolboard we support with it

        Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

        RodrigoRMaraujoundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • RodrigoRMaraujoundefined
          RodrigoRMaraujo @jay_s_uk
          last edited by

          @jay_s_uk said in CanBus model for octopus pro f429:

          @RodrigoRMaraujo https://teamgloomy.github.io/btt_octopus_pro_1.0_f429_spi2canfd_3_5.html
          You can add CAN-FD as described here. However it's been suggested to use the EFD version and use the SPI on J74.
          Then you can use any toolboard we support with it

          Thank you!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • RodrigoRMaraujoundefined
            RodrigoRMaraujo @jay_s_uk
            last edited by

            @jay_s_uk

            Please, another question.
            If I install the CAN-FD EFD version, will I be unable to use a fysect mini 12864 display that I have?
            Thanks.

            jay_s_ukundefined gloomyandyundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jay_s_ukundefined
              jay_s_uk @RodrigoRMaraujo
              last edited by

              @RodrigoRMaraujo you'd use the J74 header rather than the exp headers. They're on different hardware SPIs so you'll be fine

              Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • gloomyandyundefined
                gloomyandy @RodrigoRMaraujo
                last edited by

                @RodrigoRMaraujo As Jay has said you can use a different SPI header, though you will need to make up a wiring harness of your own to do this rather than plugging the cables into the exp headers. You will also need to find a pin for CS and pins to supply the board with power.

                @jay_s_uk Do we document how to do this anyplace?

                NOTE: You can't use a DFD style CAN-FD module at the same time as using a 12864 display, doing so will almost certainly result in the board bootlooping (the DFD and display share the same SPI bus and the long cables to the display cause all sorts of problems with the high speed signals used by the DFD). It is possible to modify a DFD to allow the alternate spi bus on J74, but it may be easier just to use the EFD module to do the same thing.

                jay_s_ukundefined RodrigoRMaraujoundefined 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jay_s_ukundefined
                  jay_s_uk @gloomyandy
                  last edited by

                  @gloomyandy no, not currently. I'll add it to the list

                  Owns various duet boards and is the main wiki maintainer for the Teamgloomy LPC/STM32 port of RRF. Assume I'm running whatever the latest beta/stable build is

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • RodrigoRMaraujoundefined
                    RodrigoRMaraujo @gloomyandy
                    last edited by RodrigoRMaraujo

                    @gloomyandy and @jay_s_uk
                    First of all, thanks for answering.

                    I don't have enough knowledge to start a challenge like this, I have no idea how it would be done lol.
                    Using canbus would be ideal, because I'm currently converting a machine running klipper, which has an ebb42 board in the car.
                    Because of the difficulty, I think I'll opt to run all the wiring for the car's accessories (without canbus).

                    I'm leaving klipper and converting my printers back to RRF because of the complexity of klipper (for me). I want to go back to the simplicity of RRF and not depend on an SBC running linux.

                    Sorry for the bad English, translated by google.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA