Simultaneous dual extrusion
-
Thanks for your message!
I will try using your suggested ratio of 0.02:0.98 with the mixing tool.
However, do you think my calculation is correct? Is it the way you would do it as well?
Appreciated!
-
@Timothee-Leblond I'm the last guy you want to do calculations for you.
I picked those numbers from the top of my head since they sounded close to what you wanted and are also useful to my mixing nozzles when trying to get a mostly pure color without clogs.
Geoff
-
Hello,
I'm coming back as I tried using mixing ratios. It seems this technique is not working very well for my setup. Indeed, both of my extruder should work independently as they should be unrelated. One is a standard extruder but the other mainly acts as an infinite screw. Its speed should not be calculated based on the same parameters as the main extruder.
For example, in the scenario of a mixing ratio, when I change the extrusion multiplier, all E values are impacted and so are both extruders. No matter the ratio, they are impacted. However, this should be only true for the main extruder only (and not the second one).
So my question is how would you control an extruder as well as an independent infinite screw, knowing that both should run at the same time? Do you think mapping the second extruder as an axis would work?
Thank you.
-
This post is deleted! -
undefined T3P3Tony referenced this topic
-
@Timothee-Leblond the mixing approach will work if you always want the same ratio of extrusion between the two extruders. If not, then another possibility is for you to write a GCode post-processor that adds the second E value. For example, if the slicer outputs this:
G1 Xxxx Yyyy E3.2
and you calculate from the XY coordinates of that move and the previous one that the path length of that G1 move is 12mm, then
G1 Xxxx Yyyy E3.2:12.0
would be appropriate.
-
I got it. And yes it is the kind of output I have from the slicer for the first extruder.
However, what I want from the second extruder is to deposit a specific length of material along the path. The only information I know is the total length (for example 4700mm). I had the idea of writing a short program that would distribute the length based on the number of move but this is not convenient as it would deposit the same length no matter how long the moves are. Also, the rate of extrusion is calculated to be the same as the printing speed as it is a continuous material.
That's why the ideal scenario would have been to send a long-distance command like G1 E4700 F300 in parallel to the regular commands. Any thoughts?
Thank you,
Timothee
-
@Timothee-Leblond bear in mind that when the XY direction changes between G1 moves there will often be a deceleration and acceleration around that direction change. Short moves between direction changes may not even reach the requested speed. So a constant extrusion rate from the second extruder may not be what you want.
Writing a post-processor is not difficult. It's been done several times before, usually written in Python.
If you are an OEM looking to build a machine with a new feature, feel free to get in touch to discuss how we might help with this. If you are wanting to lay down fibre as well as extruded plastic then I believe there are patents covering that.
-
Why not define a "mixing extruder" from the XY-axes and the constant extruder? The mixing ratio would be fix and the current motion speed would also adjust extrusion speed.
BTW: an extrusion amount of eg. 4700mm wouldn't be even close to infinite. If you want to go the infinite screw route, you can define axes upto +/- 2^31 steps length. That would be enough to print a whole week.
-
I'm working at very low speed for now so I did not face this problem yet to be honest - but thanks for the tip.
So from what I understand, there is no way I can send 2 G1 commands in parallel to deposit with my different extruders? I know it sounds weird but I think it might be worth trying different ways...
About the processor, what would you suggest starting with?
PS: I'm not an OEM but I'm developing a new machine for research purposes. I don't know if it is of interest to you, but let me know if it is the case.
Thank you very much!
-
I'm sorry but could you please give me an example or explain a bit deeper what you're thinking about? I'm not sure to understand.
I agree with you, it was just an example of a "long extrusion command" in contrast to 1.2.
Thanks!