Duet3D Logo Duet3D
    • Tags
    • Documentation
    • Order
    • Register
    • Login

    New firmware 1.21RC5 available

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Firmware installation
    15
    57
    7.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • deckingmanundefined
      deckingman
      last edited by

      @dc42:

      No, it has both S1 and S2 in it. Remove the S2.

      David,

      Could you explain what S2 actually does on a Cartesian or CoreXY?

      The Wiki is a little vague

      We have:

      "Snnn Flag to check if an endstop was hit (S1 to check, S0 to ignore, S2+S3 see note, default is S0) 1"

      Then referring to that note we have:

      "1RepRapFirmware can be set to enable or disable the "sensing" of endstops during a move. Using the S1 or S2 parameter on a delta printer causes the XYZ parameters to refer to the individual tower motor positions instead of the head position, and to enable endstop detection as well if the parameter is S1. If S3 is passed instead, RepRapFirmware will measure the axis length."

      So there is an explanation of what S2 and S3 do on a Delta but no explanation of what S2 (or S3) do when used with other kinematics. I guess it just needs a sentence in the Wki to say something like "For other Kinematics S2 does "xyz" "

      Ian
      https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
      https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dc42undefined
        dc42 administrators
        last edited by

        S2 causes a raw motor move, ignoring any mapping from axis movement to motors, and also disables axis limits, bed compensation and axis skew compensation.

        So on a Cartesian printer, S2 is just like S1 except that endstop switches are not checked. On a CoreXY printer, G1 S2 Xnn will cause just the X motor to move, resulting in a diagonal movement. Similarly for G1 S2 Ynn. But the Z motor on a CoreXY printer drives just the Z axis, so G1 S2 Znn will cause just a Z movement

        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • deckingmanundefined
          deckingman
          last edited by

          Thanks David,

          Might be an idea to cut and paste that explanation into the Wiki, as and when you get time.

          Ian
          https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
          https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Drammyundefined
            Drammy
            last edited by

            @dc42:

            No, it has both S1 and S2 in it. Remove the S2.

            This is working now; thanks for your help

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Danalundefined
              Danal
              last edited by

              I did a super quick check of the various CNC Work/Machine coordinate changes, and all looks good. I will do a more thorough check as time permits.

              However… CNCjs, in "Marlin" mode, doesn't understand how to decode the status report, and always shows machine coordinates in both the Machine and Work readouts. Not sure what the best answer is here...

              Delta / Kossel printer fanatic

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DougJonesundefined
                DougJones
                last edited by

                Regarding the external drivers. I am still getting random layer shifting in both x and y. I have upgraded to 1.21 RC5 and no change. I am using M569 P5 S1 R1 T10:10:7:2 to create the step and direction signals.

                I decided to remove the external drives to see if it was the mechanics of the system and not drive related. I installed traditional steppers on the X and Y axis using the built in drivers and re-ran the 3DBenchy. The results were pretty clear.

                While I have a couple other minor issues with cooling to resolve, the print came out much better with no layer shifting. This has been the main problem I've been fighting for weeks. The mechanical side of the printer looks good, I just have something with these external drives that I cannot figure out.

                They are 2HSS57 closed loop stepper drives and either something with the step generation or internal position/velocity monitoring loop in the drive is giving a problem. Nothing I did ever seemed to effect any change (inverting signals, changing from rising to falling edge, etc). The only thing that had a small impact was increasing the step signals from 1600 p/rev to 3200 on the drive itself and doubled the steps/mm. This resulted in reduced layer shifting, but it was still there.

                Short of replacing all the external closed loop motors/drives with steppers and using the built in drives, I'm not sure really where to go from here.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • okerchoundefined
                  okercho
                  last edited by

                  I've installed RC5 and printed a couple of things without any issues. Update from RC4 was OK without requiring rename of the file.

                  Regards

                  Okercho
                  Custom Prusa i3 Hephestos with Duet Wi-Fi
                  E3d V6 with Bondtech BMG DirectDrive and PrecisionPiezo Sensor
                  Rebuilding Hypercube Evolution

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JohnOCFIIundefined
                    JohnOCFII
                    last edited by

                    I've also had success with installing RC5 over RC4 and doing a test print on a Kossel Mini delta.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dc42undefined
                      dc42 administrators
                      last edited by

                      @DougJones:

                      Regarding the external drivers. I am still getting random layer shifting in both x and y. I have upgraded to 1.21 RC5 and no change. I am using M569 P5 S1 R1 T10:10:7:2 to create the step and direction signals.

                      I decided to remove the external drives to see if it was the mechanics of the system and not drive related. I installed traditional steppers on the X and Y axis using the built in drivers and re-ran the 3DBenchy. The results were pretty clear.

                      https://ibb.co/m5uOLH

                      While I have a couple other minor issues with cooling to resolve, the print came out much better with no layer shifting. This has been the main problem I've been fighting for weeks. The mechanical side of the printer looks good, I just have something with these external drives that I cannot figure out.

                      They are 2HSS57 closed loop stepper drives and either something with the step generation or internal position/velocity monitoring loop in the drive is giving a problem. Nothing I did ever seemed to effect any change (inverting signals, changing from rising to falling edge, etc). The only thing that had a small impact was increasing the step signals from 1600 p/rev to 3200 on the drive itself and doubled the steps/mm. This resulted in reduced layer shifting, but it was still there.

                      Short of replacing all the external closed loop motors/drives with steppers and using the built in drives, I'm not sure really where to go from here.

                      What is the maximum step pulse rate that the drivers ever receive during printing? If the rate exceeds 25kHz then the firmware switches to double stepping. Ordinary stepper drivers don't notice this, but perhaps closed-loop ones might.

                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dc42undefined
                        dc42 administrators
                        last edited by

                        PS - @DougJones, please can you try the version at https://www.dropbox.com/s/iq9pzfaugyfei7x/Duet2CombinedFirmware-even.bin?dl=0. This is an experimental build that tries to maintain regular step pulse interval at high speeds, so it may play better with servo drivers. The maximum step rate is reduced by about one third.

                        Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                        Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                        http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • nytundefined
                          nyt
                          last edited by

                          @dc42:

                          PS - @DougJones, please can you try the version at https://www.dropbox.com/s/iq9pzfaugyfei7x/Duet2CombinedFirmware-even.bin?dl=0. This is an experimental build that tries to maintain regular step pulse interval at high speeds, so it may play better with servo drivers. The maximum step rate is reduced by about one third.

                          Any thoughts re: the inconsistent homing mentioned earlier? Using a mini ir-probe with tight tolerances specified, but it's often off quite a bit from the leveling measurements which are always consistent.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Shenundefined
                            Shen
                            last edited by

                            @dc42:

                            PS - @DougJones, please can you try the version at https://www.dropbox.com/s/iq9pzfaugyfei7x/Duet2CombinedFirmware-even.bin?dl=0. This is an experimental build that tries to maintain regular step pulse interval at high speeds, so it may play better with servo drivers. The maximum step rate is reduced by about one third.

                            I have the same layer shifting problem as DougJones. I didn't bring it up since I thought it's caused by my clamp type coupling slipping. It looks like the amplitude of the shifting is reverse proportional to step per mm, my layer shifting is much less noticeable when I increased to 1000 steps/mm. I'll also test the firmware when I get a chance.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Synapsisundefined
                              Synapsis
                              last edited by

                              @dc42:

                              It's slightly more complicated than normal, because the name of the main firmware binary for the Duet WiFi and Duet Ethernet has changed.

                              To update a Duet WiFi or Duet Ethernet from RC2 to RC5, rename Duet2CombinedFirmware.bin to either DuetWiFiFirmware.bin or DuetEthernetFirmware.bin according to what your existing firmware and DWC expect. Then upload that file through the Settings->General tab of DWC. …....

                              I renamed the file Duet2CombinedFirmware.bin to DuetWiFiFirmware.bin when I try to upload from setting page I get an error

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • dc42undefined
                                dc42 administrators
                                last edited by

                                Is there already a DuetWiFiFirmware.bin file in /sys? if so, try deleting it first.

                                Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • Synapsisundefined
                                  Synapsis
                                  last edited by

                                  Thanks that was the problem.

                                  David did you get the livestream to work?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Synapsisundefined
                                    Synapsis
                                    last edited by

                                    @deckingman:

                                    @DougJones:

                                    I've upgraded to 1.21 RC5 firmware and 1.21 RC4 webcontrol

                                    When I press the home all button, i get the following error

                                    G28
                                    Error: G0/G1: Insufficient axes homed

                                    I've never gotten this before and the setup as not changed from v1.20. Any idea what's causing this?

                                    Most likely this.

                                    From the release note for RC 3 we have:
                                    "New features:

                                    On Cartesian and CoreXY printers, normal movement commands are no longer permitted until the corresponding axes have been homed"

                                    Then we have:
                                    "On Cartesian and CoreXY printers, normal G0 and G1 moves are no longer allowed before the corresponding axes have been homed. In particular, if your homex.g, homey.g and homeall.g files raise Z a little at the start and lower it at the end, you will need to add the S2 parameter to those G1 Z moves. Otherwise the G1 Z move will be refused unless Z has already been homed and the homing macro will be terminated."

                                    ….

                                    I had this problem after update and like I saw here I added S2 in homex.g, homey,g and homeall.g I was the abe to home X and Y.
                                    When i tried homeimg Z i gato the error Insufficient axes homed so -i added the S2 in homez.g it did home except that while before when it reached the correct height it would stay there while now it raise the head. I
                                    this is my homez.y
                                    G91 ; relative positioning
                                    G1 Z5 F6000 S2 ; lift Z relative to current position
                                    G90 ; absolute positioning
                                    G1 X219 Y190 F6000 ; go to first probe point
                                    G30 ; home Z by probing the bed
                                    any idea as to why its adding a G1 Z12 (that the distance is raises the bed.)

                                    Thanks

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • dc42undefined
                                      dc42 administrators
                                      last edited by

                                      G30 now raises the head to the dive height after probing.

                                      Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                      Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                      http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • FBGundefined
                                        FBG
                                        last edited by

                                        In this RC5 i test:
                                        M569 T5 (old config) work perfect,
                                        M569 T2.5:2.5:5:0 (new config) wrong (is supposed than this must work well)
                                        M569 T5:5:5:0 (new config) seem well

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dc42undefined
                                          dc42 administrators
                                          last edited by

                                          @FBG:

                                          In this RC5 i test:
                                          M569 T5 (old config) work perfect,
                                          M569 T2.5:2.5:5:0 (new config) wrong (is supposed than this must work well)
                                          M569 T5:5:5:0 (new config) seem well

                                          What is the specification of your stepper drivers?

                                          Duet WiFi hardware designer and firmware engineer
                                          Please do not ask me for Duet support via PM or email, use the forum
                                          http://www.escher3d.com, https://miscsolutions.wordpress.com

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • FBGundefined
                                            FBG
                                            last edited by

                                            https://duet3d.com/forum/thread.php?id=4831
                                            
                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA