• Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login
Duet3D Logo Duet3D
  • Tags
  • Documentation
  • Order
  • Register
  • Login

Movement is stuttering. Appears to slow printing down

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
Tuning and tweaking
7
46
5.7k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • undefined
    Asdasd1234
    last edited by 1 Nov 2018, 18:52

    I'm having an issue where Cura say's my print should only take 25 minutes, yet it's actually taking 47.

    I can only narrow it down to my movement stuttering so much. In this video below, you can see that when printing one circle, the print head flys round, but then on the next it stutters like crazy. Cura shows this as just a nice clean circle, no infil, so i dont see why it needs so much stop-start.

    https://streamable.com/isxgf

    From what I can see, my jerk/accell settings are set higher on my duet config than my cura settings so shouldn't me limiting it.

    I've attached my gcode file0_1541098291369_CFDMP_80.gcode (which has all the cura settings at the top. I cut out a bunch of the middle to keep the file size under the 4mb limit) and my duet config0_1541098165812_config.g

    If someone has any idea I would be very greatful!

    Many thanks in advance

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • undefined
      Phaedrux Moderator
      last edited by 1 Nov 2018, 20:50

      Your extruder jerk is quite low at 120mm/min

      Do you have cura set to reduce line width or flow rate for thin perimeters? I've seen it behave oddly when that's enabled. It seems to pulse the extruder in order to get a lower average flow.

      Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • undefined
        Asdasd1234
        last edited by 1 Nov 2018, 20:59

        I'm sure I left the extruder jerk at default? what would be a better value for testing? That may very well be my issue

        Thanks

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • undefined
          Phaedrux Moderator
          last edited by 1 Nov 2018, 21:06

          Try 1200mm/min

          Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 2 Nov 2018, 02:33 Reply Quote 0
          • undefined
            Asdasd1234
            last edited by 1 Nov 2018, 21:58

            nope 😞 Doesn't seem to have made any difference. Shall i try it higher maybe?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • undefined
              Phaedrux Moderator
              last edited by 1 Nov 2018, 22:26

              I'd try slicing with a different slicer and testing again. Maybe even just a small cross section of the part to see if you can duplicate the stutter.

              Z-Bot CoreXY Build | Thingiverse Profile

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • undefined
                Asdasd1234
                last edited by 1 Nov 2018, 23:13

                I'll try that tomorrow when I get in from work. Thanks for your help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • undefined
                  burtoogle
                  last edited by 1 Nov 2018, 23:15

                  The inner walls appear to contain a real mixture of line segment lengths, some are really small. I see you are using pressure advance. I think maybe that combination has been reported to cause problems before now (not certain, just a vague recollection). So you could try disabling the pressure advance.

                  However, the fact that the outer walls don't seem to have such variation in line segment length makes me think that Cura has screwed up somewhere so I shall investigate that.

                  undefined 1 Reply Last reply 2 Nov 2018, 23:05 Reply Quote 0
                  • undefined
                    garis @Phaedrux
                    last edited by 2 Nov 2018, 02:33

                    @phaedrux I'm very interested in this. I have a Zesty Nimble and the documentation says:

                    "RepRap Firmware: 0.6mm / sec
                    M566 should have E value set to E40 (as it is set per minute)"

                    and they also suggest not fiddling with this too much.

                    With a 0.6 volcano nozzle I'm mindful that the standard advice doesn't apply.

                    I am still experimenting and its seems M566 E 100 - 300 is the likely range for print quality and apparent speed although speed on infill seems low which is why I tried values higher than M566 E40. DC42's formula in a pressure advance discussion, for PA 0.10 secs (which is about right for my printer) gave me M566 E2000 with M201 E340 so I thought there is something wrong somewhere. E2000 wasn't good in print quality !!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • undefined
                      burtoogle
                      last edited by 2 Nov 2018, 13:21

                      Hello @Asdasd1234 , could you please save the Cura project for that print and attach to this thread? I would like to try slicing it myself to see if I can recreate those short line segments. Thanks.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • undefined
                        Asdasd1234
                        last edited by Asdasd1234 11 Feb 2018, 13:31 2 Nov 2018, 13:30

                        Hi, it should be attached now. I've tried with and without the thin walls being on and it makes zero difference to the print time or the stuttering
                        https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Od4A0c_NOH5hUTV8xDeujaesBHcyCbso/view?usp=sharing

                        thanks

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • undefined
                          Asdasd1234 @burtoogle
                          last edited by 2 Nov 2018, 23:05

                          @burtoogle said in Movement is stuttering. Appears to slow printing down:

                          The inner walls appear to contain a real mixture of line segment lengths, some are really small. I see you are using pressure advance. I think maybe that combination has been reported to cause problems before now (not certain, just a vague recollection). So you could try disabling the pressure advance.

                          However, the fact that the outer walls don't seem to have such variation in line segment length makes me think that Cura has screwed up somewhere so I shall investigate that.

                          Turning off pressure advanced sped it up a massive amount!... But I would like to have pressure advance running 😞 Is this a known bug/incompatibility or is there a workaround?

                          Many thanks for your help so far though!

                          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 2 Nov 2018, 23:23 Reply Quote 0
                          • undefined
                            deckingman @Asdasd1234
                            last edited by 2 Nov 2018, 23:23

                            @asdasd1234 said in Movement is stuttering. Appears to slow printing down:

                            @burtoogle said in Movement is stuttering. Appears to slow printing down:

                            The inner walls appear to contain a real mixture of line segment lengths, some are really small. I see you are using pressure advance. I think maybe that combination has been reported to cause problems before now (not certain, just a vague recollection). So you could try disabling the pressure advance.

                            However, the fact that the outer walls don't seem to have such variation in line segment length makes me think that Cura has screwed up somewhere so I shall investigate that.

                            Turning off pressure advanced sped it up a massive amount!... But I would like to have pressure advance running 😞 Is this a known bug/incompatibility or is there a workaround?

                            Many thanks for your help so far though!

                            It sounds like your extruder instantaneous speed setting (jerk) is too low. That will cause problems with pressure advance.

                            Edit. Just looked at your config and see that you have it set to 120 mm/min which is really slow. That will slow everything down and is likely the cause of all your problems. I don't know what extruder you are running but I use 3600 with my Bondtechs and former Titans.

                            Ian
                            https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                            https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                            undefined 1 Reply Last reply 2 Nov 2018, 23:59 Reply Quote 0
                            • undefined
                              Asdasd1234
                              last edited by 2 Nov 2018, 23:43

                              I changed it to 1200 following some advice above but it made no difference. I will try 3600 now though, and higher if needed to see if it starts working before other issues arive from it being too high. Thanks

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • undefined
                                garis @deckingman
                                last edited by 2 Nov 2018, 23:59

                                @deckingman Just try to get my mind around this - I am still getting familiar with useful reasonable ranges for various settings.

                                At Jerk E3600 you are effectively disabling extruder acceleration for most extruder movement (< 60mm/sec), and effectively replacing all acceleration for the acceleration embedded in the Jerk movement. And for reference, Zesty Nimble (which I use) advise E40 for Jerk - 2 orders of magnitude apart. The Nimble cable response to Jerk is presumably the issue which doesn't apply elsewhere. I am in the middle of testing.

                                undefined 2 Replies Last reply 3 Nov 2018, 00:11 Reply Quote 0
                                • undefined
                                  deckingman @garis
                                  last edited by 3 Nov 2018, 00:11

                                  @garis Doesn't quite work like that because the extruder speed has to follow the axis speed, during acceleration as well as at steady speed. Having said that, you can't use the extruder jerk setting I suggested with a Nimble.

                                  Ian
                                  https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                                  https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • undefined
                                    deckingman @garis
                                    last edited by 3 Nov 2018, 09:41

                                    @garis Check with Zesty that the "40" for extruder "jerk" is mm/sec and not mm/min. If it's mm/min then that equate to 2,400 mm/sec. I don't have any hands on experience of the Nimble but my understanding is that it uses very high gearing which means that the steps per mm will be high.

                                    .........Although, now I've looked again at you config and see that they are set to 420 which is about right for something like a Bondtech or Titan, so maybe I was wrong about the Nimble having high gearing and thus high steps per mm requirement.

                                    Ian
                                    https://somei3deas.wordpress.com/
                                    https://www.youtube.com/@deckingman

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • undefined
                                      burtoogle
                                      last edited by 3 Nov 2018, 09:45

                                      Hello @Asdasd1234 , I think I know what's happening but don't yet have a fix. In the meantime, could you please print the attached gcode and report whether the slowdown/stuttering is any different to before. You need not print the whole object if there's no improvement. Thanks.

                                      0_1541238280413_CFFFP_CFDMP_80.gcode

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • undefined
                                        Asdasd1234
                                        last edited by 3 Nov 2018, 11:40

                                        It definitely printed faster than the original file I uploaded. But it still stutters and causes a worse surface finish than just turning off Pressure Advance.

                                        I've attached a picture of the 3 side by side (Set e-Jerk to 40000 on all to make sure its not that limiting it):

                                        • On the left, My original file. Pressure advance is on, Cura estimates 24 minutes print time. Actual print time, 48 Mins
                                          Lots of stuttering, horrible surface finish.

                                        • In the middle. I had the same settings but just turned off Pressure Advance. This gave a real nice surface finish, but I lose all benefits Pressure advance so the layer changes look horrible due to the oozing. Zero stuttering though. Cura estimates 24 minutes print time. Actual print time, 31 (still far form the 24 that cura thinks and I cant work out why 😞 )

                                        • On the Right. Your Gcode file you supplied this morning. Pressure advance is back on. It prints faster than the one on the left with an actual print time of 35 mins , but still suffers from stuttering and has worse surface finish due to that than the middle one which prints faster.

                                        Also, I'm happy to print out as many test prints as I need, as none will be wasted. I'm trying to get the fast printing sorted so I can pump out 50 odd of them for a relative 🙂

                                        Many thanks so far guys!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • undefined
                                          Asdasd1234
                                          last edited by 3 Nov 2018, 11:45

                                          Had to put this pic in this post because the last one keeps flagging it as spam 😞 https://i.imgur.com/nHRrIsG.jpg

                                          undefined 1 Reply Last reply 3 Nov 2018, 12:05 Reply Quote 0
                                          8 out of 46
                                          • First post
                                            8/46
                                            Last post
                                          Unless otherwise noted, all forum content is licensed under CC-BY-SA