Jerky movements, again
-
Thanks for your example. My printers are out of action until my office refurbishment is complete, but I'll try it out when I can. Feel free to remind me on Wednesday if you don't get a response before then.
-
What happens when you do the exact same gcode with M350 X16 Y16 Z16 E16 I0 ?
-
One other question: what motor current have you set in your M906 command?
-
@bot:
What happens when you do the exact same gcode with M350 X16 Y16 Z16 E16 I0 ?
The same thing, but motors are very loud in this mode (relative to interpolated I1), so clicking noise is less audible over steppers noise.
One other question: what motor current have you set in your M906 command?
Thank you, now I'm not alone
I'm using [c]M906 X1500 Y1500 Z1500 E1000 I60[/c] with Wantai 42BYGHW811 motors. 200 steps/rev, 2.5A rated current, 1.8 mH phase inductance according to datasheet. Also I'm using 12V 30A LED power supply.
I have tried also 1.9 A and 1.0 A motor current, nothing changed.
Also I recorded both videos, my phone touches one of delta towers to amplify possible noise. I hope you can listen difference.
UPD: click frequency on first video is about 5-10 hertz. Clicks appear while effector moves around circle. But there is no clicks while effector goes down or while straight movement (from center to start of circle). -
Yet another video, I put my phone directly on moving caret to record better sound.
-
Seems like I need to go to Specsavers. What are we supposed to be looking at? Have you actually tried printing anything and if so, is the printed object misshapen?
-
I'm just want to say that something wrong : ) I'm not experiencing any real problems with printing using Duet WiFi, I'm happy Duet WiFi owner, but this is something abnormal.
Yes, this clicking pattern is slightly visible on printed objects, but I'm unable take good quality photo to show this. And this almost does not affect print quality.
-
I can't see any difference in the movement between the first two videos but maybe that's because I'm an old guy who wears glasses. You seem to be trying to make videos that record the sound, so are you saying that it sounds different?
-
I ran roboduet's file on my Rostock Mx V2 and can confirm that there is a different sound as he describes. You can definitely hear a tick which might line up with the interpolation point. Both 128 and 256 microstep without interpolation are smooth and don't have the tick. There is perhaps a discontinuity at some point in the interpolation. I couldn’t hear this when running the same test on my CoreXY, so perhaps it's specific to deltas?
However, I also ran print tests and cannot see any difference in the results! So, to me at least, this appears to be of academic interest only.
-
I can't see any difference in the movement between the first two videos but maybe that's because I'm an old guy who wears glasses. You seem to be trying to make videos that record the sound, so are you saying that it sounds different?
Yes, that's what I want to say. English is not my native language so sometimes I cannot say what I want in few words so other people can understand me.
Can you hear clicking (5-10 times per second) sound on last video with black picture? This clicks are felt, if I touch a finger to the carriage. This feels like tower caret stops moving for few milliseconds and then starts moving again.
But there is no any clicks or other sounds then I change microstepping to 1/256. Everything else is the same - maximum jerk settings, accelerations, speed, motor currents and so on.
-
I ran roboduet's file on my Rostock Mx V2 and can confirm that there is a different sound as he describes.
However, I also ran print tests and cannot see any difference in the results! So, to me at least, this appears to be of academic interest only.Thank you very much! At least this is confirmed now by other people too.
As about differences in print quality - I can see slight differences in external surface, but I'm sure this is absolutely not a problem for me. I can try to find macro photo friendly plastic and right lighting to take photo with differences. Also I'm not sure what is affecting print quality - true 1/256 microstepping instead of interpolated 1/16 or this clicking issue.
-
The interpolation is only completely accurate when the carriages are moving at constant speed, which is rarely the case on a delta printer. So my guess is that the clicking noises are produced when the drive gets the interpolation wrong, perhaps when a carriage reverses direction in the middle of a move. Dynamically varying microstepping will solve that, when I get round to implementing it.
-
I hear this clicking sounds with interpolation disabled at 1/16 microstepping.
Also seems like I found bug, printer completely freezes (including ESP8266 web server code) then I executing this commands: [c]G28[/c] to home printer, [c]M350 X16 Y16 Z16 I0[/c] to disable interpolation (interpolation enabled in config) and then start printing file without (!) homing after executing M350 command. This is reproducible every time I enter this commands.
-
I hear this clicking sounds with interpolation disabled at 1/16 microstepping.
Also seems like I found bug, printer completely freezes (including ESP8266 web server code) then I executing this commands: [c]G28[/c] to home printer, [c]M350 X16 Y16 Z16 I0[/c] to disable interpolation (interpolation enabled in config) and then start printing file without (!) homing after executing M350 command. This is reproducible every time I enter this commands.
I can guess what is happening. Executing M350 flags the axes as not homed, so for every move that your file asks for there will be a error message generated. The Duet will run out of message buffers, so it will no longer process status requests. Sending a pause command via USB or possibly PanelDue may still work. Or you can wait until the file finishes"printing".
-
So my guess is that the clicking noises are produced when the drive gets the interpolation wrong, perhaps when a carriage reverses direction in the middle of a move.
Just small note about interpolation and this clicks - linear (straight) movement of effector does not produce this clicks with interpolation enabled. At the start of first two videos effector goes down to Z = 10.3 mm at X0 and Y0 and then goes to start of circle at X-49.744 Y1.647. This straight move is without clicks.
To summarize my messages:
Moves with clicks: segmented (many g-codes with short straight lines) movement around circle regardless of interpolation mode at 1/16 microstepping.
Moves without clicks: straight movement with any microstepping setting or segmented movement around circle with 1/256 microstepping.
I will try tomorrow to create small script that produces straight segmented moves and slightly bent (extremely large radius) segmented moves to test how angle between two straight movement g-codes affects this.
-
I'm just created simple script that produces segmented (0.5 mm) straight movement from X-50 Y-50 to X50 Y50 and then goes back to X-50 Y-50 with single g-code:
[[language]] T0 G21 ; set units to millimeters G90 ; use absolute coordinates M83 ; use relative distances for extrusion G1 X-50 Y-50 Z10.300 F4800 G1 X-49.5 Y-49.5 F960 G1 X-49 Y-49 G1 X-48.5 Y-48.5 G1 X-48 Y-48 G1 X-47.5 Y-47.5 G1 X-47 Y-47 G1 X-46.5 Y-46.5 G1 X-46 Y-46 G1 X-45.5 Y-45.5 G1 X-45 Y-45 G1 X-44.5 Y-44.5 G1 X-44 Y-44 G1 X-43.5 Y-43.5 G1 X-43 Y-43 G1 X-42.5 Y-42.5 G1 X-42 Y-42 G1 X-41.5 Y-41.5 G1 X-41 Y-41 G1 X-40.5 Y-40.5 G1 X-40 Y-40 G1 X-39.5 Y-39.5 G1 X-39 Y-39 G1 X-38.5 Y-38.5 G1 X-38 Y-38 G1 X-37.5 Y-37.5 G1 X-37 Y-37 G1 X-36.5 Y-36.5 G1 X-36 Y-36 G1 X-35.5 Y-35.5 G1 X-35 Y-35 G1 X-34.5 Y-34.5 G1 X-34 Y-34 G1 X-33.5 Y-33.5 G1 X-33 Y-33 G1 X-32.5 Y-32.5 G1 X-32 Y-32 G1 X-31.5 Y-31.5 G1 X-31 Y-31 G1 X-30.5 Y-30.5 G1 X-30 Y-30 G1 X-29.5 Y-29.5 G1 X-29 Y-29 G1 X-28.5 Y-28.5 G1 X-28 Y-28 G1 X-27.5 Y-27.5 G1 X-27 Y-27 G1 X-26.5 Y-26.5 G1 X-26 Y-26 G1 X-25.5 Y-25.5 G1 X-25 Y-25 G1 X-24.5 Y-24.5 G1 X-24 Y-24 G1 X-23.5 Y-23.5 G1 X-23 Y-23 G1 X-22.5 Y-22.5 G1 X-22 Y-22 G1 X-21.5 Y-21.5 G1 X-21 Y-21 G1 X-20.5 Y-20.5 G1 X-20 Y-20 G1 X-19.5 Y-19.5 G1 X-19 Y-19 G1 X-18.5 Y-18.5 G1 X-18 Y-18 G1 X-17.5 Y-17.5 G1 X-17 Y-17 G1 X-16.5 Y-16.5 G1 X-16 Y-16 G1 X-15.5 Y-15.5 G1 X-15 Y-15 G1 X-14.5 Y-14.5 G1 X-14 Y-14 G1 X-13.5 Y-13.5 G1 X-13 Y-13 G1 X-12.5 Y-12.5 G1 X-12 Y-12 G1 X-11.5 Y-11.5 G1 X-11 Y-11 G1 X-10.5 Y-10.5 G1 X-10 Y-10 G1 X-9.5 Y-9.5 G1 X-9 Y-9 G1 X-8.5 Y-8.5 G1 X-8 Y-8 G1 X-7.5 Y-7.5 G1 X-7 Y-7 G1 X-6.5 Y-6.5 G1 X-6 Y-6 G1 X-5.5 Y-5.5 G1 X-5 Y-5 G1 X-4.5 Y-4.5 G1 X-4 Y-4 G1 X-3.5 Y-3.5 G1 X-3 Y-3 G1 X-2.5 Y-2.5 G1 X-2 Y-2 G1 X-1.5 Y-1.5 G1 X-1 Y-1 G1 X-0.5 Y-0.5 G1 X0 Y0 G1 X0.5 Y0.5 G1 X1 Y1 G1 X1.5 Y1.5 G1 X2 Y2 G1 X2.5 Y2.5 G1 X3 Y3 G1 X3.5 Y3.5 G1 X4 Y4 G1 X4.5 Y4.5 G1 X5 Y5 G1 X5.5 Y5.5 G1 X6 Y6 G1 X6.5 Y6.5 G1 X7 Y7 G1 X7.5 Y7.5 G1 X8 Y8 G1 X8.5 Y8.5 G1 X9 Y9 G1 X9.5 Y9.5 G1 X10 Y10 G1 X10.5 Y10.5 G1 X11 Y11 G1 X11.5 Y11.5 G1 X12 Y12 G1 X12.5 Y12.5 G1 X13 Y13 G1 X13.5 Y13.5 G1 X14 Y14 G1 X14.5 Y14.5 G1 X15 Y15 G1 X15.5 Y15.5 G1 X16 Y16 G1 X16.5 Y16.5 G1 X17 Y17 G1 X17.5 Y17.5 G1 X18 Y18 G1 X18.5 Y18.5 G1 X19 Y19 G1 X19.5 Y19.5 G1 X20 Y20 G1 X20.5 Y20.5 G1 X21 Y21 G1 X21.5 Y21.5 G1 X22 Y22 G1 X22.5 Y22.5 G1 X23 Y23 G1 X23.5 Y23.5 G1 X24 Y24 G1 X24.5 Y24.5 G1 X25 Y25 G1 X25.5 Y25.5 G1 X26 Y26 G1 X26.5 Y26.5 G1 X27 Y27 G1 X27.5 Y27.5 G1 X28 Y28 G1 X28.5 Y28.5 G1 X29 Y29 G1 X29.5 Y29.5 G1 X30 Y30 G1 X30.5 Y30.5 G1 X31 Y31 G1 X31.5 Y31.5 G1 X32 Y32 G1 X32.5 Y32.5 G1 X33 Y33 G1 X33.5 Y33.5 G1 X34 Y34 G1 X34.5 Y34.5 G1 X35 Y35 G1 X35.5 Y35.5 G1 X36 Y36 G1 X36.5 Y36.5 G1 X37 Y37 G1 X37.5 Y37.5 G1 X38 Y38 G1 X38.5 Y38.5 G1 X39 Y39 G1 X39.5 Y39.5 G1 X40 Y40 G1 X40.5 Y40.5 G1 X41 Y41 G1 X41.5 Y41.5 G1 X42 Y42 G1 X42.5 Y42.5 G1 X43 Y43 G1 X43.5 Y43.5 G1 X44 Y44 G1 X44.5 Y44.5 G1 X45 Y45 G1 X45.5 Y45.5 G1 X46 Y46 G1 X46.5 Y46.5 G1 X47 Y47 G1 X47.5 Y47.5 G1 X48 Y48 G1 X48.5 Y48.5 G1 X49 Y49 G1 X49.5 Y49.5 G1 X-50 Y-50Update: also click frequency directly depends on frequency of g-codes, seems like this clicks going between g-code commands. Maybe something like fill of next command queue or read-ahead of g-codes freezing movements?
Example of low-frequency clicks with longer segments:
[[language]] T0 G21 ; set units to millimeters G90 ; use absolute coordinates M83 ; use relative distances for extrusion G1 X-50 Y-50 Z10.300 F4800.000 G1 X-50 Y-50 F960 G1 X-45 Y-45 G1 X-40 Y-40 G1 X-35 Y-35 G1 X-30 Y-30 G1 X-25 Y-25 G1 X-20 Y-20 G1 X-15 Y-15 G1 X-10 Y-10 G1 X-5 Y-5 G1 X0 Y0 G1 X5 Y5 G1 X10 Y10 G1 X15 Y15 G1 X20 Y20 G1 X25 Y25 G1 X30 Y30 G1 X35 Y35 G1 X40 Y40 G1 X45 Y45Now I'm sure that this clicks are result of a lot of g-code fragments. David, I think that something wrong.
-
Thanks for your example. My printers are out of action until my office refurbishment is complete, but I'll try it out when I can. Feel free to remind me on Wednesday if you don't get a response before then.
David, did you have time to check this? It seems to me that RRF produces very small pauses after each g-code, this pauses causes jerky moves. Even linear (straight?) movement of effector on my delta produces this pauses. You can view example g-codes in my previous post. But 1-line (w/o segments) g-code does not produce this pauses.
Now I can hear this pauses almost in every print with smooth curved movements
-
I think if I listen very carefully to my delta running a 0.8.5 I can hear similar sounds. Can you post photos of the surface defects it creates on the sides of the print? I'm sorry if you posted this already and I missed it.
-
@bot:
I think if I listen very carefully to my delta running a 0.8.5 I can hear similar sounds. Can you post photos of the surface defects it creates on the sides of the print? I'm sorry if you posted this already and I missed it.
I said earlier that I'm unable to take macro photos of differences with acceptable quality of photo. I will try later with another plastic colors and right light. UPD: this defects looks like vertical columns of very small plastic blobs on surface of printed part.
Also I said before that print quality isn't a problem for me, I'm happy Duet WiFi owner, but I still think that something is wrong here with g-code processing or something another.
That's why I'm trying to draw David's attention to this problem. But seems like he is very busy in the last month and haven't time to check this.
-
Okay, no worries. I just figured since I checked the other day and noticed a faint sound that is similar to yours, and with the same consistency, that I'd let you know. I don't notice any print defects at all that I can attribute to this noise, however.
