Robotic kinematics
-
@tony73 when you're ready with setup, please tell me your M669, then I can calculate whether all positions are calculated correctly (kinematics and inverse kinematics) - if you want.
PS to calculate errors exactly, I need steps/degree values of the actuators also (the M92 settings).
-
@JoergS5
good morning ! i was trying duet 3 6ch with 5 stepper motors connected (one test) to see, in config .g gave M669 of your example M669 K13 X20.0: 5.0 Y0.0: 10.0 Z50.0 R0 L300.0: 400.0: 200.0 : 100.0 P0 but I changed R1 to R0 to have 5 stepper motors, duet 3 is connected to the pc with usb and simplify 3d. If I write M699 it responds like this
the lengths of the arms are missing and the parameter (R) if I write M669 L300.0: 400.0: 200.0: 100.0 accepts the arms but for (R0) nothing does not accept! what problem could that be?
another thing is the total homing, it should be (home5axisrobot.g) but writing G28 does not accept only (homeall.g) or single axes, example (homex.g) , help !!!!
here is the (config.g) not very accurate fact, for a kidnapped test and little time available! Hello !!
-
@tony73 I cannot detect a bug in the source at the first view. Please let me some time, I can look at it the next days.
The homeall file is called home5axisrobot.g and homallg is not needed. This was a declaration in
static constexpr const char *Home5AxisRobotFileName = "home5axisrobot.g";
but I am not sure whether it is used correctly. I will check it also. -
I've used the term kinematics a number of times in this lecture and I haven't really been very clear about what it means. Kinematics is a branch of mathematics ...
-
@Antomy5 I don't know the definition, but I know what it means at 3D printers and robots: kinematics are functions of movement from actuators to the cartesian coordinates, and inverse kinematics is the other direction.
Kinematics in physics describe the motion of points or bodies, I think this is similar. -
OK !! you haven't tried to connect a duet card with homing motors and switches, to try it you can, at least see if the parameters type M669 respond (the various R0, R1, R2, P0, P1, P2: nnn, Lnnn: mmm: ppp: qqq, etc .... the parameter (R) seems to me to answer, but it is not seen when calling M669, home5axisrobot.g does not accept it, instead takes homeall.g, anyway thank you !!! and I wait !!!
-
@tony73 the reason why R0 is not visible is clear: I added it short time ago, it's not included in the status message yet. I'll add it.
I'll fix the other problems soon and tell you when I have a new source checked in in github. -
@tony73 Hello, I've found the errors and corrected them. I used a method which had unexpected side effects, so now I avoided it. The new release is checked in.
I changed the homefile name to homeall.g
Please feel free to report me if you find something else. I'll finish my prototype next, so I can test too (e.g. unusual arm movements).
-
Hello!! you were very fast, I recompiled the changes m669 looks ok! everything is visible
now i have to build a robot arm to try, i know the functions of the arms and the joints counterclockwise positive degrees clockwise negative degrees scara in this and similar, the problem remains that I don't understand this! the function !
I don't understand what to measure and how to build axis 1 and axis 2! what help does this parameter give you? you said you wanted flexibility, referring I believe the imperfections of the construction of the robot, thanks!
-
@JoergS5
ps . good morning! I re-read your help and I think I understand how it works (this feature)
can you just tell me if there is a limit of coordinates x, y, z ? can this be put?
M669 K13 X70.0: 70.0 Y70.0: 70.0 Z50.0 ......... -
@tony73 you can simply build your robot as you like. You measure the properties of the robot after building the robot and set the parameters:
- measure arm lenghts 2 to 5
- measure where axis 1 and axis 2 are located and set parameters X, Y and Z according to the description (arms 2 and 3 parallel to x axis). Those coordinates are the places where you put the axes.
- measure and set the angles for all axes by homing or external measuring
Just build the robot, I will explain it better soon. From your questions I see that I did not explain it good enough. I will make it clearer with better images when I have a prototype my own and I can make images. The reason why I did not use images from the internet is, I wanted to avoid licensing problems.
-
good day! I saw that the updates continue! I found that if the size of the print bed (M208) is not right for the size of the robot arm, it won't move and write this (Error: G1 / G2 / G3: intermediate position outside machine limits). in (M208) should you put only X, Y, Z or also U, V?
Is parameter P1 working? can you give me an example how to change the angle of the 5th axis using P1?
after homing the robot arm, before moving it, thinks it is stretched along the X axis with all the motors in 0 degree position (is that right or am I wrong?)another question, this is M114 immediately after homing, why does V always mark V 5.005? shouldn't it be zero? in M669 I put (P2: 0.0) thanks!
-
This post is deleted! -
This post is deleted! -
@tony73
I will finish the prototype next weekend and can then test the issues you have myself. I will tell you when I have fixed the source.If you want to lower the M208 limits to avoid your error, you could lower restrictions in the methods IsReachable and LimitPosition.
I will update the current status of development in the https://duet3d.dozuki.com/Wiki/Configuring_RepRapFirmware_for_a_FiveAxisRobot?revisionid=HEAD document near the begin of the document in the Status section. Here you can see that P1 is not supported yet.
-
@JoergS5 sounds like it’s nearly time to get my old Armdroid https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co470742/armdroid-robotic-arm-robotic-arm from the loft, dust it off, and install a Duet! Excited by this development, well done!
I did get it going with RAMPS, but only had four (of
sixfivesix (I forgot there are two for the wrist, that allows the gripper to either rotate around the wrist joint, or rotate in line with the wrist, which may be a challenge for kinematics)) motors working, and could only move the motors directly (no Kinematics).Ian
-
@droftarts it would be great if you reactivate it!
The development is not finished yet and I have a lot of ideas in addition. But I want to have a good fundament first (firmware, documentation and hardware DIY description to help others to build a robot).
-
good morning! I did various tests, and I realized that I had to find the right relationship with lengths of the individual arms, min max angular limits of the joints and min max limits of (M208 in config.g)
I tried with these arms using 5 steppers i.e (R0) (L2 200mm L3 200mm L4 100mm L5 0mm) (X 0.0: 0.0 Y 0.0: 0.0 Z 100.0) or had to modify (from A-45: 45: 0: 75: - 75: -5: -170: 170: -135: 135 in A-45: 45: 0: 140: -140: -5: -170: 170: -135: 135) inside FiveAxisRobotKinematics.h I recompiled the firmware because I did not understand if I could modify them in M669, and I can tell you that with the parameters in equilibrium the motors move reaching more and more printing area.
for the construction of the robot as you told me are you doing this?
-
@tony73 yes, I build it similar to this, but arm 4 longer down and axis 5 and arm 5 attached. The advantage is, that the arm 4 is vertical automatically and the upper and lower parallel arm elements will probably result in a higher precision (as the article described). I think it is similar like the parallel scara robot is more precise than a normal scara robot. I make the inner-arm-elements as wide and high as possible for the same reason, and axis 1 a big (30 cm diameter) plate.
The angle limits you mention can be set with the A parameter, although they are not reported yet. I will add them to the report. The report was so long, so I hesitated, but I compressed them now, so it's an advantage to get confirmation over all settings. It was a joy to use it in DWC while testing the parameters and changing all on-the-fly!
-
I would have
I wanted to build the same robot to be able to do the tests, but with my family, work and other things I have little time left, it would take too much to build, so I would have thought of this solution, I would buy this kit to shorten the time just mount it and connect the duet, it would be a thing in acceptable times !!
I would block the joint on arm 3 (L3) see photo !!! because this is a 6-axis and would be used as a 5-axis (a good compromise between price and quality, and in aluminum it should be stable in order to carry out acceptable tests!)
I hope that in the future you will be able to implement the 6th axis in the firmware, can you tell me if it will be possible or if this would complicate the firmware?
tell me if this robot seems like a valid solution to you !! Hello !
